The Guttenberg Plagiarism Scandal

Abstract

Not long after a German newspaper revealed that Germany’s popular Defense Secretary Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg had plagiarized his dissertation, he resigned from office, leaving international news media wondering about this political scandal. German news media had covered Guttenberg intensely, and often favorably, before the plagiarism scandal. Germany’s three leading news magazines Spiegel, Focus, and Stern paid more attention to Guttenberg than any other politician, featuring him in 10 cover stories during his time in the national political spotlight from 2009 to 2011. Using the theory that news carries myth, this textual analysis concludes that Stern and Focus cast Guttenberg in the narrative of the hero myth while Spiegel offered a more critical counternarrative. This study contributes to a growing literature of the use of myth through news and provides evidence for the meaning of journalism as ritualistic communication. On a practical level, it warns journalists not to oversimplify complex political issues.

Keywords

myth Germany journalism ritual model of communication Guttenberg magazine

Introduction

Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg received his doctorate in 2007. In 2011, less than one and a half years into his term as Germany’s Secretary of Defense, a newspaper revealed that he had plagiarized his dissertation (Preuss & Schultz, 2011). The ensuing plagiarism scandal put journalists in Germany into “a barely ever experienced state of emergency […], which approached intellectual civil war” (Mohr, 2011). During the plagiarism scandal in February and March 2011, Germany’s top five circulated dailies¹ covered Guttenberg mostly negatively in 348 stories (Jansen, 2012). British and U.S. news media, such as the New York Times (Kimmelman, 2011; Pfanner, 2011), Time (Boston, 2011), Cable News Network (2011), British Broadcasting Corporation (2011), Reuters (2011), the Economist (2011), and the Guardian (Pidd, 2011), puzzled over the scandal. International news media, however, did not address the extensive German news media coverage of Guttenberg before his plagiarism was discovered. During Guttenberg’s career in national politics, from 2009 to 2011, no other politician received such attention in German news media. Between November 2008 and April 2010, Germany’s six leading print news media² covered Guttenberg in nearly 600 mostly positive articles (Hemmelmann, 2011). Between December 2009 and February 2011, Germany’s 23 leading broadcast and print news media³ published more than 16,500 stories about Guttenberg, shifting toward a more negative coverage shortly before and during the plagiarism affair, according to a Media Tenor study (Schwegler, 2011).

This study textually analyzes the 10 cover stories of Guttenberg in Germany’s leading news magazines Spiegel, Focus, and Stern prior, during, and after the plagiarism scandal, between July 2009 and March 2011, covering a longer period than previous studies. Other than Hemmelmann (2011) and Jansen (2012), this study focuses on all three news magazines; both studies did not include Stern. Previous studies did not apply the theory of myth through news to explain the heightened news media attention to Guttenberg. Hemmelmann used theories of agenda setting, framing, image building, and mechanisms of news media coverage of politics. Jansen (2012) and Media Tenor (Schwegler, 2011) did not include theoretical frameworks.

This study argues that it is necessary to analyze the underlying narrative that fueled such a sustained and intense coverage of Guttenberg before and after the plagiarism scandal. News magazines capture stories of continued interest and offer analysis and stories in a longer format beyond fast-paced daily journalism. Consequently, Germany’s three leading news magazines, Spiegel, Focus, and Stern, were used for a textual analysis. This study applied the theory by Lule (2001) that journalism transports myth and Carey’s (1989) notion of journalism as ritualistic communication. On a practical level, this study urges journalists to reflect larger patterns in news coverage beyond the editorial, historical, and economic backgrounds of their news outlets. It warns journalists not to oversimplify complex political stories.

Guttenberg’s Career: News and Myth

Guttenberg entered national politics in 2009 amidst a difficult climate: only 70.8% of Germans voted in the national election, a record low since 1949 (Bundeswahlleiter, 2009). He quickly became one of the most popular politicians in Germany, first as secretary of economy, then as secretary of defense. As much as Chancellor Angela Merkel accommodates German preferences for separating private and professional lives, she often has been perceived as dull, with her husband, a renowned chemistry professor, equally disliking public appearances (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 2005). Merkel’s somber decorum was a welcome change after the previous “media chancellor” Gerhard Schröder (König, 2002). But after several years of covering her, news media were ready for someone who enjoyed their attention.

Focus and Stern interpreted Guttenberg’s career along the hero myth, which includes the elements of “a miraculous but common birth, demonstration of superhuman strength and ability, rapid rise to prominence or power, triumphant struggle with the forces of evil, proneness to pride, and ultimate decline through betrayal or sacrifice resulting in death” (El-Shamy, 2010, p. 653). For instance, Stern wrote:

[Guttenberg is] someone who is different than the others: young, smartly dressed and speaking a flowery language. [He is] an aristocrat without airs and graces, with family assets that are worth millions and a lineage going back to the 14th century. [He is] married to the great great granddaughter of Bismarck.⁴ [He is] a climber coming from above, unheard of. (Vornbäumen, 2009)

Focus and Stern saw Guttenberg’s rapid rise in his move from obscure local politician to secretary of economy in the federal government. Both magazines portrayed him as possessing “superhuman” political powers, for instance when dealing with the bankrupt automaker Opel. Later, as defense secretary, he abolished conscription and called Germany’s engagement in Afghanistan a “war”—something no other German politician had done so directly before. In addition to these “triumphs,” Guttenberg unexpectedly survived the investigations into two military affairs. Focus and Stern portrayed these affairs as fighting “evil forces,” over which the hero Guttenberg ultimately won victory. They identified the plagiarism of his dissertation as his downfall, the loss of his doctoral title and his subsequent resignation as defense secretary as “political death.” They interpreted his attempt to return to politics as failed. Guttenberg admitted his “political death” at the time in an open letter in early 2012.

In contrast, Spiegel countered the hero narrative from the beginning by using fairy tale metaphors to criticize and ridicule Guttenberg. Its first cover called Guttenberg “disenchanted.” The cover story investigated Guttenberg’s responsibility in political affairs. A second cover mocked him and his wife as “The fabulous Guttenbergs.” The third cover, during the plagiarism scandal, was titled: “The Fairly Tale of the Honest Karl” (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Timeline of events and covers of Spiegel, Focus, and Stern magazines relating to Guttenberg.

Each news magazine reported on Guttenberg’s career according to its own editorial, historical, and economic background. Nevertheless, all three magazines remained within a discourse centering on the hero myth.

Theory and Literature Review

Myths are models that give meaning and values to human life: They supply a blueprint to achieve something that was done before (Eliade, 1975). Humans combine facts and interpretations to create narratives in which mythical elements imbue events with “the odor of meaning or significance” (White, 1973, p. 294). This process continues in modern society in which shared memories are constructed to “negotiate between available historical records and current social and political agendas” (Zerubavel, 1995, p. 5). One modern form that myth takes is news.

Parallel to their prominence in mythology, heroines/heroes are the most pervasive figures in news that carries myths (Lule, 2001). Heroines/heroes “symbolize and reflect the process of both individual and societal growth and development, they resonate with the inner and outer needs and desires of all human beings” (El-Shamy, 2010, p. 656). Heroines/heroes have gained momentum in modern society in which ritual decays and inherited religions disintegrate, shifting meaning from groups to the self-expression of the individual: “Not the animal world, not the plant world, not the miracle of spheres, but man himself is now the crucial mystery” (Campbell, 2008, p. 337). In the European context, especially a “noble origin” has been part of the myth of an Aryan, primordial ancestor imbued with purity, physical strength, and heroic ethos (Eliade, 1975).

Over the past three decades, researchers from different disciplines have studied the meaning of commemorative narratives and rituals in contemporary society, including journalism (Edy, 1999; Lule, 2001; Zelizer, 1992; Zerubavel, 1995). Zerubavel (1995) demonstrated, in her case study on the construction of Israeli National Culture, how ancient elements were interwoven and reinterpreted in modern events to create grand narratives to reaffirm national identity. While Zerubavel referred to state actors, a similar pattern has been observed for journalists’ construction of news (Lule, 2001). As myth, news uses familiar narratives to offer comfort and a sense of control, explaining the incomprehensible and novel as “soothingly predictable” (Bird & Dardenne, 2009, p. 206; Lule, 2001). While Lule (2001) pointed to seven master myths being used in journalism, Bird (2005) cautions that particular times and places can produce their own “cultural moments and narratives, rooted in particular histories” (p. 226). The strong link between (commemorative) journalism and rituals that sustain society has been theorized by Carey’s (1989) ritual view of communication. He highlights that news is not directed:

toward the extension of messages in space but toward the maintenance of society in time; not the act of imparting information but the representation of shared beliefs. […] the archetypal case under a ritual view is the sacred ceremony that draws persons together in fellowship and commonality (p. 18).

In other words, “commemorative rituals and stories may serve as a means of developing unity in the wake of social discord rather than a means of celebrating unity” (Edy, 1999, p. 83). Edy cautions that commemorative journalism needs to remain a space to negotiate the meaning of the past rather than solidifying a hegemonic reading of memories. Similarly, Steiner (2002) raised the question which myths are used in news to convey different social-cultural contexts. As media scholars increasingly accept the idea that news carries myth, they warn that such use can oversimplify stories (Steiner, 2002). While meaning making rests with the audience (Hall, 1973), it is limited by prechosen conditions. Meaning making requires an effort to go beyond an initial glance (Mendelson, 2007). Especially pictures can “impose meaning at one stroke, without analysing or diluting it” (Barthes, 1987, p. 110), highlighting certain aspects while obscuring others.

For instance, Kitch (2002) concluded that the coverage of U.S. President John F. Kennedy confirmed the significance of journalism in reaffirming national beliefs and the use of the hero myth to make sense of unexpected tragedy. Similarly, Zelizer (1992) demonstrated how journalists who covered the assassination of Kennedy became “authoritative spokespersons” who shaped the collective memory of the event (p. 2). In a study of German state broadcaster Deutsche Welle (comparable to Voice of America), Silcock (2002) concluded that myths were used to construct a new German national identity. Comparing U.S. and German coverage of the 1992 earth summit, Opt (1997) found that it was influenced by national myths. Musolff (2012) and Lü (2008) demonstrated how German news media recontextualized national myths with which Germans could identify.

This study asks: How did Germany’s leading news magazines, Spiegel, Focus, and Stern, use the hero myth to cover the political career of Guttenberg?

Method

News magazines typically publish stories of continuing interest in longer formats. They combine photos, graphics, and texts in reflective analysis in contrast to the fast-paced updates of daily journalism. Especially, their print versions provide good periodic snapshots of unfolding narratives compared with the volatile content on their Web sites. For these reasons, the print versions of Germany’s leading news magazines, Spiegel, Focus, and Stern, offered the best possible material to analyze the narratives of the Guttenberg coverage. The three magazines also publish their print versions online, update their Web sites several times daily and offer additional content (Noelle-Neumann, Schultz, & Wilke, 2004). This content, however, is only accessible to the 77% of Germans who go online (ARD/ZDF Onlinestudie, 2013). In contrast, almost all Germans can see and buy a print issue on the street. Print magazine use has been slowly declining, but more than 90% of Germans still read magazines (Lang, 2013).

During Guttenberg’s debut in national politics in February 2009 and his retirement in January 2012 (for the time being), all three magazines published 10 Guttenberg covers and cover stories. Spiegel and Stern each published three covers and cover stories; Focus published four (Figure 1).

The majority of their readers are men: 68% of Spiegel, 67% of Focus, and 59% of Stern readers. Regarding education, 23% of Stern, 25% of Focus, and 35% of Spiegel readers hold a college degree. More than 80% of each magazine’s readers are 30 years or older; more than half of each magazine’s readers are in the highest earning third of the population (MA Media-Analyse AG, 2014). The three magazines count many journalists among their readers (Weischenberg, 2002). Spiegel is the “most important medium” for journalists (Meyn, 2004, p. 104); two thirds read it regularly. In sum, the magazines mostly garner an elite audience.

Over the past 15 years, only Spiegel has increased its subscriptions, making up almost half of its distributed copies; Focus and Stern sell most issues on the street (IVW, 2014; Figure 2). A compelling cover remains crucial for all three magazines to make a sales pitch to passersby: “To evoke an immediate and involuntary response within the viewer, images are often more efficient than text alone” (Popp & Mendelson, 2010, p. 205).

Figure 2.

Overview of reach and circulation of Spiegel, Focus, and Stern.

This study used textual analysis to discern patterns (Berger, 1998) and the most likely (i.e., to most people) interpretations of a given text (McKee, 2006). This involved a “long, preliminary soak” (Hall, 1975, p. 15), reading all of the three magazines’ 10 cover stories and editorials that referred to Guttenberg and studying the cover photos and photos in the cover stories⁵ to reach a deep understanding of and familiarity with them. Particular attention was paid to the cover photos and headlines. This allowed for an extraction of larger themes to compare the magazines’ approaches to covering Guttenberg and to interpret them in the context of German culture, the magazines’ backgrounds and the theories of the hero myth in news and ritualisic communication. In total, this study analyzed 32 pages and 21 photos in Spiegel, 46 pages and 50 photos in Stern, and 42 pages and 36 photos in Focus.

Two Hero Tales and a Counternarrative

To juxtapose the approaches of the three news magazines, the analysis follows the chronology of events. It begins with the first of all 10 covers across the three magazines in 2009 and ends with the last cover in 2011 (Figure 1). Before detailing the coverage, a brief background for each magazine is provided.

Spiegel [Mirror] has been Germany’s longest running news magazine, an opinion leader (Kleinsteuber & Thomass, 2010) and the “most quoted publication” (Schrag, 2007, p. 163). Spiegel’s first issue appeared in 1947; it has built a reputation for critical, investigative coverage and showing “the other side of the coin” (Meyn, 2004, p. 103). Spiegel has been lauded for providing independent journalism, information beyond the reports of daily newspapers, and addressing unpopular topics (Meyn, 2004). But Spiegel has also earned the reputation to frequently ridicule politicians of the conservative Christian Democratic Union and its Bavarian-based sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU) (Meyn, 2004), of which Guttenberg has been a member. Spiegel shares a special history with the CSU because of the Spiegel Affair. In 1962, Franz Josef Strauß, defense secretary and CSU star, had to resign after it was discovered that he was responsible for raiding Spiegel newsrooms and arresting journalists. Strauß had alleged that Spiegel had committed treason by claiming that Germany’s defenses were weak. But Germany’s highest court declared the raid and arrests by Strauß to be illegal and in violation of the press freedom.

Stern [Star] started publishing in 1948 (Minkmar, 2000), striving to reveal scandals and “occasionally finding them where none exist” (Meyn, 2004, p. 110). It became known for publishing what were ostensibly Hitler’s diaries but turned out to be fakes. Stern developed a reputation for checkbook journalism, which a former Stern publisher defended as necessary to reveal political affairs (Meyn, 2004).

The history of Focus is much shorter. Focus started publishing in 1993, mostly offering “news you can use,” such as rankings of schools and health providers. It uses more colored photographs, graphics, and shorter articles than its main rival Spiegel. Focus strives to provide service journalism to its readers while also being entertaining. It features a mostly positive outlook, targeting a “younger info-elite”⁶ (Meyn, 2004, p. 106). Focus is less of a watchdog and critic of politics than Spiegel but offers a broader range of and more opinions by politicians, celebrities, and aggrieved parties (Stockmann, 1999).

2009—The Discovery

Stern—A New Man in Town

In July 2009, Stern published the first Guttenberg cover of all three magazines. Guttenberg smiles into the camera; his dark gelled hair is combed back; he wears thin-rimmed glasses (Figure 3). The cover is titled: The Cool Baron. Why the New Secretary of Economy Is So Popular (Stern, 2009). The cover story juxtaposes Guttenberg’s aristocratic background with his fresh approach to politics. Stern describes his hometown of Guttenberg as a small Bavarian community, established in 1148 and remaining under his family’s influence until 1848. Stern presents the politician as an exotic and ranks him the second most popular politician in Germany.⁷ In a Stern interview, Guttenberg credits his popularity to the newcomer effect. Stern adds that other politicians “eyeball critically how someone storms up the ladder—turning a cover story in Stern already into a problem” (Vornbäumen, 2009). On the “coolness” side, Stern reports Guttenberg’s visit to an AC/DC concert, addressing the public in the local dialect in a beer tent, his 17-hour workday and citizens’ standing ovations when he appears. Only when Stern juxtaposes Guttenberg’s self-proclaimed straightforward talk with his behind-the-back jokes about Berlin’s gay mayor, the magazine hints at a more complex figure than the hero it presents.

Figure 3.

The Cool Baron, Stern, July 9, 2009.

Spiegel—An Emperor Without Clothes

Contrary to Stern’s first cover (and the first Focus cover later in 2010), Spiegel’s first Guttenberg cover story (2009a) 5 months later criticizes his mythical status. It is titled The Disenchanted (Figure 4) and Spiegel editorializes:

Despite castle, forest, horse and hound, the aristocrat staged himself as common folk. Soon people talked about the ‘pop star of market places’ and the ‘baron of the hearts.’ The myth of the upright, unyielding politician was born when Guttenberg offered his resignation [as secretary of economy] over the planned sale of [automaker] Opel. (Spiegel, 2009b, p. 3)

Figure 4.

The Disenchanted, Spiegel, December 14, 2009.

Spiegel addresses the myth making as unrealistic: “It’s not possible to remain a luminary in politics” (Spiegel, 2009b, p. 3). It compares Guttenberg to “the emperor without clothes.” Spiegel heavily criticizes Guttenberg’s decision to quickly fire a high-ranking official in the Kunduz Affair, in which 140 Afghans died in an attack under German command. Spiegel concludes that politics are complex, difficult, and full of traps for every politician, including Guttenberg.

2010—Rise

Focus—Reserve Chancellor

Focus’ (2010a) first Guttenberg cover delivers the most optimistic headline of all: Reserve Chancellor. Why Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg Is Becoming Dangerous for Angela Merkel (Figure 5). Guttenberg’s face fills the page; with tight lips he gazes at something beyond the camera. Focus suggests a man with vision and serious intent. Similar to the first Stern cover, Focus explains why Guttenberg fascinates Germans, writing almost half of the German population can envision him as chancellor:

The smart baron should have never made it to the top according to the iron rules of the political circus: too young, too handsome and too elite. But these merciless criteria of opinion leaders, who associate young with inexperienced, handsome with superficial and elite with aloof, don’t seem to apply to Guttenberg. Even crude blunders cannot stop his career; they just make him more popular. (Wilke, 2010)

Figure 5.

Reserve Chancellor, Focus, July 12, 2010.

German elites associate “Germanness” with reliability, punctuality, order, a sense of duty, and “German depth,” which refers to a romantic notion of serious reflectiveness. These attributes are perceived as opposites of being aloof or having lightness, which Germans associate with the Mediterranean, as well as of being superficial, which Germans associate with the United States (Terkessidis, 2010). Similarly, Germans view inexperience negatively; they emphasize professional roles and institutions (Fukuyama, 1995). They value “continuity… order, consistency, and predictability” (Dyson, 1996, p. 199).

Focus describes Guttenberg’s support for the bailout of automaker Opel as “simply reasonable” despite his initial opposition. The article also gives short shrift to Guttenberg’s controversial firing of a high-ranking official in the Kunduz Affair. Focus highlights his $780 million in family assets, well-connected family network, and emphasis on principles and independence. Focus writes that Guttenberg would satisfy a yearning for conservative values of security, stability, and order during a time of high unemployment and financial woes. It adds that Guttenberg knows how to play the media. For instance, Stern writes, he appeared on Germany’s most popular evening show with his “lovely half-Swede” wife (Wilke, 2010)—a nod toward many Germans’ infatuation with Sweden as a travel destination and setting for popular crime novels.

Spiegel—“Fabulous”

Spiegel (2010a) publishes its second mocking cover story shortly after Focus had declared Guttenberg reserve chancellor. Spiegel titles: The Fabulous Guttenbergs. A Couple on Its Way to the Chancellory (Figure 6). In tone and font, the title parallels the popular 2001 French modern fairy tale of “The Fabulous World of Amélie” (Figure 7) about a naïve daydreamer. It thus interprets Guttenberg as a daydreaming character in a modern fairy tale. It is the only cover that also depicts Guttenberg’s wife, presenting the couple in front of stairs with a red carpet, suggesting social climbing. Similar to Focus, Spiegel (2010b) editorializes the Guttenbergs knew all about “the art of representative performances” (p. 3). The cover story compares the Guttenbergs to other glamorous couples such as the Clintons, the Blairs, the Obamas, and Sarkozy/Bruni (Demmer, Feldenkirchen, Kurbjuweit, & Pfister, 2010). Spiegel quotes Guttenberg as saying that rumors about him as future chancellor would irritate him and that he can fall from popularity any minute. Still, 70% of Germans are sympathetic to him, as Spiegel describes in its mocking style:

The masses pass him by with longing; their gazes ooze with deep admiration. Only a handful of people dare to address him; many give him an appreciative nod prompting Guttenberg to raise his beer glass. The scene looked like obeisance given to a king. (Demmer et al., 2010, p. 29)

Figure 6.

The Fabulous Guttenbergs, Spiegel, October 18, 2010.

Figure 7.

The Fabulous World of Amélie, 2001.

Focus—Man of the Year

At the end of 2010, Focus (2010b) publishes a second laudatory cover: Man of the Year (Figure 8). The photograph shows Guttenberg from below and renders him into a figure looming large. Focus writes:

If a few years ago someone would have said a Catholic-Bavarian whippersnapper from an old aristocratic lineage with a weakness for gelled hair, Wagner’s music and grandfather-like sentences, who is married to a pornography-criticizing blonde, would rise, via the Christian Social Union party, from the primordial depth of the province to Berlin to start a career as a conservative, we would have given Homer Simpson a better chance. (Weimer, 2010)

Figure 8.

Man of the Year, Focus, December 13, 2010.

This quote summarizes well how Focus traces Guttenberg along the narrative of the hero myth: with a distinct birth, fighting the odds and gaining “messianic veneration.”

2011—Fall and Attempted Return

Focus—Losing His Honor

Focus and Spiegel each react to the plagiarism scandal immediately with a third cover, both published on February 21, 2011. Focus’ (2011a) titles: The Lost Honor (Figure 9). The cover depicts him as aged beyond his years with wrinkles and stubble. Focus writes: “The photo shooting—an otherwise welcome opportunity for him to put himself into a favorable light—turns out to be agonizing. Again and again he wraps his arms around his body like a protective shield” (Ackeren, Dolak, Fietz, & Randenborgh, 2011). Focus now describes a fall foretold, caused by Guttenberg’s wrongdoing. As Stern, Focus recommends a quick apology. It suggests that ordinary Germans would not care about an academic scandal, citing a poll that more than two thirds say Guttenberg should remain defense secretary even if the plagiarism was true. Unlike its previous mostly positive coverage, Focus now asks Guttenberg in an interview about an accident on the prestigious military training ship Gorch Fock, during which a German Navy cadet died (Ackeren, Siemens, & Randenborgh, 2011).

Figure 9.

The Lost Honor, Focus, February 21, 2011.

Spiegel—Final Fairy Tale

The third Spiegel cover (2011a), published during the plagiarism scandal, states: (Dr.) zu Guttenberg and the Truth: The Fairy Tale of Honest Karl (Figure 10). The cover depicts Guttenberg reading the story of “Hans in Luck” to children, symbolizing the naïvety of an audience that likes to listen to tall tales. Calling Guttenberg by his first name, Spiegel turns him into the storyteller of his own fairy tale:

Of all people Guttenberg. He is the politician who was said to be especially honest, sincere and authentic. […] If Guttenberg turns out to be a liar, then the last political hope of many citizens will fade; then trust into politics could further decline. He is now bearing responsibility for this. (Darnstädt et al., 2011, p. 21)

Figure 10.

The Fairy Tale of Honest Karl, Spiegel, February 21, 2011.

Spiegel (2011b) elaborates why Guttenberg’s plagiarism matters so much:

An aristocratic title is inherited; a doctor title is earned. What does the willingness to plagiarize say about a character? A dissertation changes something in life. The title becomes part of one’s name. You are addressed as Dr.; you are introduced as Dr. You automatically receive respect for your intellectual accomplishment. The Dr. is always there and follows you into the grave. Someone who cheats on a dissertation wants to achieve a lot with little effort, thinks that borrowed plumes are a charming decoration, and wants to appear smarter that he is. He deems the title more important than the work for it. Such a person only cares for show and presentation. (Darnstädt et al., 2011, p. 29).

Germans’ regard for institutions, professional roles, order, reliability, consistency, and authority (Dyson, 1996; Fukuyama, 1995; Terkessidis, 2010) renders cheaters to be violators of these values. When Guttenberg did not admit to the plagiarism after facts proved it, he worsened the situation. Spiegel concludes, lacking an explanation for his dissertation, his resignation would be appropriate.

Stern—Pain

Stern’s second Guttenberg cover on March 3, 2011, after his resignation, is headlined: “The Most Painful Step in My Life” (Figure 11). The black and white photo reminds of an old movie; a shadow over Guttenberg’s face suggests a darker side to his character. Stern editorializes:

Guttenberg still insists that he did not plagiarize or use a ghostwriter. Common sense suggests one of the two is a lie: someone who plagiarized more than half of 475 pages either did so deliberately or employed someone who did. (Osterkorn, 2011, p. 5)

Figure 11.

The Most Painful Step of My Life, Stern, March 3, 2011.

Stern describes Guttenberg’s move to Connecticut as “escape” and “exile.” It suggests a quicker admission and resignation would have secured him a political future, including a potential candidacy for chancellor.

Focus—Chance for Comeback

Unlike Stern and Spiegel (2011b), Focus (2011b) published a fourth cover story in the aftermath of the plagiarism scandal: The Chance for Comeback (Figure 12).] The cover photograph depicts Guttenberg jumping in midair. He appears frozen in time. Focus argues that his resignation is a precondition for a comeback. More extensively than Stern, Focus draws parallels to a previously failed prominent politician, Franz Josef Strauß: he also hailed from Bavaria, was defense secretary, and member of the CSU party. In 1962, Strauß had to resign due to the Spiegel Affair. Focus details how Strauß returned to national politics after 4 years and ran as a candidate for chancellor. In 2011, Focus writes, it only took a few hours for parliamentarians to ask for Guttenberg’s comeback. Additionally, 58% of Germans wished that Guttenberg would return after a hiatus (Ackeren, Gude, et al., 2011).

Figure 12.

The Chance for Comeback, Focus, March 5, 2011.

Stern—Failed Comeback

After the plagiarism scandal, Guttenberg reappeared in public for the first time in November 2011, as a speaker at a Canadian conference. At the same time, Guttenberg published his book Failed For Now. This prompted Stern to publish its third cover: It’s Me again. The Failed Comeback (Figure 13). The cover depicts a different Guttenberg: without glasses and hair gel; a shadow covers half of his face. Stern writes that Guttenberg missed his chance to offer a serious apology, partially because his book was allegedly ghostwritten. A true transformation of the hero had not happened.

Figure 13.

It’s Me Again, Stern, December 1, 2011.

Conclusion

With 10 cover stories, Spiegel, Focus, and Stern dedicated more covers to Guttenberg than to any other politician between February 2009, when he debuted in national politics, and January 2012, when he retreated from German politics. German news media favored him over other politicians: “Guttenberg was not only the people’s darling, but also the media’s darling” (Hemmelmann, 2011, abstract).

As subscriptions are low and magazines depend on street sales while overall magazine readership is slowly declining, Focus and Stern promoted Guttenberg as a hero on celebratory covers. Stern lived up to its reputation of focusing on celebrities and scandals whenever an opportunity arises. Focus, with its typically positive outlook, continued to promote Guttenberg after the plagiarism revelation. In contrast, Spiegel, sustained by a large subscriber base, used its well-known style of innuendo to mock Guttenberg as a figure out of fairy tales. This is in line with Spiegel’s reputation of showing the “other side of the coin” and ridiculing politicians of the CSU party (Meyn, 2004). These findings confirm and add to Hemmelmann’s (2011) and Jansen’s (2012) content analyses.

As Lule (2001) argued, humans need myths for orientation and motivation. But the hero figure, produced by Focus and Stern, was taken for real and rapidly disintegrated when confronted with the human that Guttenberg is. Guttenberg’s aristocratic background and demeanor as an honest outsider to federal politics provided the material for Focus and Stern to portray him as a European-style hero of noble origin (Eliade, 1975), representing German values (Terkessidis, 2010). The plagiarism contradicted this narrative of a “German hero.” Focus and Stern had to turn him into a tragic or failed hero.

As Guttenberg quickly scapegoated and fired others, Spiegel easily turned him into a scapegoat and demanded his resignation. This is an example of schadenfreude in which someone is “hurt” the same way she/he “had hurt” others before. This schadenfreude found its expression in many jokes (Abendzeitung, 2011) and was handy to fulfill Spiegel’s prophecy of Guttenberg as a false hero. The schadenfreude theme was most apparent in the third Spiegel cover, which gleefully projected the message: “We told you so.”

The Schadenfreude interpretation of Guttenberg’s fall as the final act, however, is just one element in the larger narrative arch of the hero myth that also includes the (potential) return of the hero. Campbell (2008) describes that a hero’s work can also include a return after a “transfiguration,” to share a lesson learned and to start a new life. This second interpretation of the aftermath of the plagiarism scandal was expressed on the Stern and Focus covers about a (desired but for now failed) comeback. The three magazines’ different depictions mirror the tensions among news media and the public between wanting to dismantle someone who had grown too popular too quickly on the one hand and their desire for a hero to shake up politics as usual.

The three magazines interpreted the events surrounding Guttenberg according to their economic, historical, and editorial background. Yet, the narrative arch of the hero myth enthralled all three to produce extraordinary, intense, and long-term coverage of one politician. Using the hero myth lead Focus and Stern to neglect their journalistic duty for objective and factual coverage and Spiegel to indulge in mockery despite the serious investigations it also offered. This leaves the author to wonder if such repeated hyping on one hand, belittlement on the other hand and overall placement of real politics into the world of mythical heroes, emperors, fabulous characters, and fairy tales contributes to a fatigue in the public to participate in politics and elections. Focusing on a person is easier than translating complicated, ambiguous situations into understandable news stories. Yet, oversimplifying stories and turning politicians into larger-than-life heroes does not do justice to the news media’s mandate to convey the complexity and import of political issues to the public.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interest

The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Notes

Author Biography

Stine Eckert is assistant professor in the Department of Communication at Wayne State University. Her research interests include international, comparative approaches; social media and gender; social media and minorities; and the democratic potential of social media. Learn more about her work at www.stineeckert.com and follow her on .

References

Abendzeitung. (2011). Die lustigsten Guttenberg-Witze [The funniest Guttenberg jokes]. Retrieved from http://www.abendzeitung-muenchen.de/inhalt.plagiats-affaere-die-lustigsten-guttenberg-witze.6ef02f6c-1a05-4955-b604-846977d65873.html.

Ackeren, M. V., Dolak, G., Fietz, M., & Randenborgh, K. V. (2011). Der isolierte minister [The isolated secretary]. Retrieved from http://www.focus.de/magazin/archiv/politik-der-isolierte-minister_aid_601828.html.

Ackeren, M. V., Gude, H., Kistenfeger, H., Seybold, P., Thewes, F., & Van Randenborg, K. (2011). Macht Guttenberg den strauß? [Will Guttenberg do it like Strauss?]. Retrieved from http://www.focus.de/magazin/archiv/zurueck-auf-los-macht-guttenberg-den-strauss_aid_605726.html.

Ackeren, M. V., Siemens, A., & Randenborgh, K. V. (2011). Haben sie an rücktritt gedacht? “Unsinn!” [Did you think of resigning? “Nonsense!”]. Retrieved from http://www.focus.de/magazin/archiv/der-isolierte-minister-haben-sie-an-ruecktritt-gedacht-unsinn_aid_601830.html.

ARD/ZDF Onlinestudie (2013). Onlinenutzung [Online usage]. Retrieved from http://www.ard-zdf-onlinestudie.de/index.php?id=394.

Barthes, R. (1987). Mythologies. Paris: Edition du Seuil.

Berger

A. A.

(1998) Techniques of interpretation. In: Berger

A. A.

(ed.) Media analysis techniques, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 3–35.

Bird

S. E.

(2005) CJ’s revenge: A case study of news as cultural narrative. In: Rothenbuhler

Coman

(eds) Media anthropology, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 220–228.

Bird

S. E.

Dardenne

R. W.

(2009) Rethinking news and myth as storytelling. In: Wahl-Jorgenson

Hanitzsch

(eds) The handbook of journalism studies, New York, NY: Routledge.

10.

Boston, W. (2011). Germany: Plagiarism claims take down Guttenberg. Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2056525,00.html.

11.

British Broadcasting Corporation. (2011). German “plagiarism” minister Guttenberg drops doctorate. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12504347.

12.

Bundeswahlleiter. (2009). Bundestagswahlergebnisse 1949–2009 [Federal election results 1949–2009]. Retrieved from http://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/de/bundestagswahlen/downloads/bundestagswahlergebnisse/btw_ab49_ergebnisse.pdf.

13.

Cable News Network. (2011). German defense minister quits in plagiarism scandal. Retrieved from http://articles.cnn.com/2011-03-01/world/germany.politics_1_defense-minister-plagiarism-scandal-guttenberg?_s=PM:WORLD.

14.

Campbell

(2008) The hero with a thousand faces, Novato, CA: New World Library.

15.

Carey

(1989) A cultural approach to communication. In: Carey

(ed.) Communication as culture: Essays on media and society, Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman, pp. 13–36.

16.

Darnstädt

Demmer

Hickmann

Kurbjuweit

Müller

M. U.

Neukirch

Pfister

Sauga

Verbeet

(2011, February 21) Doktor der reserve [Reserve doctor]. Spiegel 8: 20–29.

17.

Demmer

Feldenkirchen

Kurbjuweit

Pfister

(2010, October 18) Der bürgerkönig [The king of citizens]. Spiegel 42: 28–36.

18.

Dyson

(1996) The economic order—Still model Germany. In: Smith

Patterson

W. E.

Padett

(eds) Developments in German politics, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 194–210.

19.

Economist. (2011). A German plagiarism scandal. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/blogs/newsbook/2011/02/german_plagiarism_scandal.

20.

Edy, J. A. (1999, Spring). Journalistic uses of collective memory. Journal of Communication, pp. 71–85.

21.

Eliade

(1975) Myth and reality, 1st ed. New York, NY: Harper Colophon Books.

22.

El-Shamy

(2010) Hero/heroine, folk. In: McCormick

C. T. H.

White

K. K.

(eds) Folklore: An encyclopedia of beliefs, customs, tales, music, and art, Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, pp. 650–656.

23.

Focus. (2010a, July 12). Kanzler der Reserve [Reserve chancellor]. Focus, 28, Cover.

24.

Focus. (2010b, December 13). Der Mann des Jahres [The man of the year]. Focus, 50, Cover.

25.

Focus. (2011a). Die verlorene Ehre [The lost honor]. Retrieved from http://www.focus.de/magazin/archiv/titel-titelseite-die-verlorene-ehre_aid_601814.html.

26.

Focus. (2011b, March 5). Die Chance zum Comeback [The chance for comeback]. Focus, 10, Cover.

27.

Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. (2005). Merkels forscher [Merkel’s researcher]. Retrieved from http://www.faz.net/s/RubFC06D389EE76479E9E76425072B196C3/Doc∼EF79EC84C6195486A9CE63E722CED029D∼ATpl∼Ecommon∼Scontent.html.

28.

Fukuyama

(1995) Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity, New York, NY: Free Press.

29.

Hall

(1973) Encoding and decoding in the television discourse, Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

30.

Hall

(1975) Introduction. In: Smith

A. C. H.

Immirzi

Blackwell

(eds) Paper voices: The popular press and social change, 1935–1965, Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 11–24.

31.

Hemmelmann

(2011) M(iniste)r perfect? Wie der politiker karl-theodor yu guttenberg zum liebling der medien wurde [M(iniste)r Perfect? How the politician Karl Theodor zu Guttenberg became the media darling]. Communicatio Socialis 44(2): 169–178. . Retrieved from http://ejournal.communicatio-socialis.de/index.php/cc/article/view/340.

32.

IVW. (2014). Informationsgesellschaft zur feststellung der verbreitung von werbeträgern e.V [German Audit Bureau of Circulations]. Retrieved from http://daten.ivw.eu/index.php?menuid=12&u=&p=&t=Alphabetischer+Gesamtindex&b=a.

33.

Jansen, C. (2012). Die causa Guttenberg in den printmedien [The Guttenberg case in print media]. Düsseldorfer forum politische kommunikation [Forum of Political Communication Düsseldorf]. Retrieved from http://www.dfpk.de/2012/wp-content/uploads/Panel%2002%20-%20Vortrag%201%20-%20Jansen%20-%20Die%20Causa%20Guttenberg%20in%20den%20Printmedien%20-%20VERSION%20WEBSITE.pdf.

34.

Kimmelman. M. (2011, March 15). Will cheating hurt a German politician? New York Times, pp. C1, C7.

35.

Kitch

(2002) ‘A death in the American family’: Myth, memory, and national values in the media mourning of John F. Kennedy Jr. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 79(2): 294–309.

36.

Kleinsteuber, H. J., & Thomass, B. (2010). Media landscape: Germany. Retrieved from http://www.ejc.net/media_landscape/article/germany/.

37.

König, J. (2002). Das system medienkanzler [The system of media chancellor]. Tageszeitung. Retrieved from http://www.taz.de/1/archiv/archiv/?dig=2002/09/06/a0172.

38.

Lang, K. (2013). Zeitschriftennutzung sinkt langsam, aber stetig [Use of magazines slowly and steadily decreasing]. Horizonte. Retrieved from http://www.horizont.net/aktuell/medien/pages/protected/MA-Pressemedien-Zeitschriften-Nutzung-sinkt-langsam-aber-stetig-_112511.html.

39.

Lule

(2001) Daily news, eternal stories, New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

40.

Lü

(2008) Germany’s war in China: Media coverage and political myth. German Life & Letters 61(2): 202–214.

41.

MA Media-Analyse AG. (2014). Reichweiten pressemedien I. Retrieved from http://www.ma-reichweiten.de/index.php?fm=1&tt=3&mt=1&sc=000&vr=1&d0=0&d1=1&d2=2&d3=-1&vs=3&m0=0&m1=-1&m2=-1&m3=-1&rs=26&ms=27&mg=a0&bz=0&b2=0&vj=1&mt1=Tabelle+erzeugen.

42.

McKee

(2006) Textual analysis: A beginner’s guide, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

43.

Mendelson

(2007) The construction of photographic meaning. In: Flood

Brice

S. H.

Lapp

(eds) Research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts, New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 27–36.

44.

Meyn

(2004) Massenmedien in deutschland [Mass media in Germany], Cologne, Germany: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.

45.

Minkmar, N. (2000). Stern im Schatten des Spiegels [Stern magazine in the shadow of Spiegel magazine]. Retrieved from http://www.zeit.de/2000/17/200017.m-stern_vor_dem_.xml.

46.

Mohr, R. (2011). Online-Medien oder die sklerotisierung der öffentlichkeit [Online media or the sclerotization of the public]. Retrieved from http://www.dradio.de/dlf/sendungen/essayunddiskurs/1457635/.

47.

Musolff

(2012) From teamchef Arminius to Hermann junior: Glocalised discourses about a national foundation myth. Language & Intercultural Communication 12(1): 24–36.

48.

Noelle-Neumann

Schultz

Wilke

(2004) Fischer lexikon publizistik massenkommunikation [Fischer Lexicon Communication Science], Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Fischer.

49.

Opt

S. K.

(1997) The earth summit: Maintaining cultural myth. Journal of the Northwest Communication Association 25: 1–22.

50.

Osterkorn

(2011, March 3) Editorial. Ein tiefer Fall [A deep fall]. Stern 10: 5.

51.

Pfanner, E. (2011). Gloves off in German media scramble. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/14/business/global/14bild.html?pagewanted=all.

52.

Pidd, H. (2011). German defence minister resigns in PhD plagiarism row. Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/01/german-defence-minister-resigns-plagiarism.

53.

Popp

R. K.

Mendelson

A. L.

(2010) ‘X’-ing out enemies: Time magazine, visual discourse, and the war in Iraq. Journalism 11(2): 203–221.

54.

Preuss, R., & Schultz, T. (2011). Guttenberg soll bei doktorarbeit abgeschrieben haben [Guttenberg is claimed to have plagiarized his dissertation]. Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved from http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/plagiatsvorwurf-gegen-verteidigungsminister-guttenberg-soll-bei-doktorarbeit-abgeschrieben-haben-1.1060774.

55.

Reuters (2011). German defense minister quits in plagiarism row. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/01/us-germany-guttenberg-idUSTRE7201WI20110301.

56.

Schrag

(2007) Medienlandschaft deutschland [Media landscape Germany], Konstanz, Germany: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.

57.

Schwegler, P. (2011). Medien-Analyse: Guttenberg-Rücktritt musste sein. W&V [Media analysis: Guttenberg’s resignation had to happen]. Retrieved from http://www.wuv.de/medien/medien_analyse_guttenberg_ruecktritt_musste_sein.

58.

Silcock

B. W.

(2002) Global news, national stories: Producers as mythmakers at Germany’s Deutsche Welle television. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 79(2): 339–352.

59.

Spiegel. (2009a, December 14) Der Entzauberte [The disenchanted]. Der Spiegel 51: Cover.

60.

Spiegel. (2009b, December 14) Hausmitteilung [Note to readers]. Der Spiegel 51: 3.

61.

Spiegel. (2010a, October 18). Die fabelhaften Guttenbergs [The fabulous Guttenbergs]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-74549705.html.

62.

Spiegel. (2010b, October 18) Hausmitteilung [Note to readers]. Spiegel 42: 3.

63.

Spiegel. (2011a, February 21). Das Märchen vom ehrlichen Karl [The fairy tale of the honest Karl]. Spiegel, 8, Cover.

64.

Spiegel. (2011b, February 21) Hausmitteilung [Note to readers]. Spiegel 8: 3.

65.

Steiner

(2002) Editorial. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 79(2): 270–271.

66.

Stern. (2009, July 9). Der coole Baron [The cool baron]. Stern, 29, Cover.

67.

Stern. (2011, March 3). “Der schmerzlichste Schritt meines Lebens” [“The most painful step of my life”]. Stern, 10, Cover.

68.

Stockmann

(1999) Spiegel und focus: Eine vergleichende inhaltsanalyse 1993–1996 [Spiegel and Focus: A comparative content analysis], Göttingen, Germany: Schmerse Verlag.

69.

Terkessidis

(2010) Interkultur [Interculture], Bonn, Germany: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.

70.

Vornbäumen, A. (2009). Der coole Baron [The cool baron]. Stern. Retrieved from http://www.stern.de/politik/deutschland/wirtschaftsminister-karl-theodor-zu-guttenberg-der-coole-baron-706359.html.

71.

Weimer, W. (2010). Der überflieger [The high flyer]. Focus. Retrieved fromhttp://www.focus.de/magazin/archiv/titel-der-ueberflieger_aid_581051.html.

72.

Weischenberg

(2002) Journalistik. Band 2. Medientechnik, medienfunktionen, medienakteure, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

73.

White

(1973) Interpretations in history. New Literary History 4(2): 281–314.

74.

Wilke, O. (2010). Der Kanzler-kandidat [The candidate for chancellor]. Focus. Retrieved from http://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/deutschland-der-kanzler-kandidat_aid_529220.html.

75.

Zelizer

(1992) Covering the body: The Kennedy assassination, the media, and the shaping of collective memory, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

76.

Zerubavel

(1995) Recovered roots: Collective memory and the making of the Israeli national tradition, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.