This study investigates the impact of human trafficking laws and digital carceral technologies on Asian migrant massage workers in the United States. Drawing on community-engaged oral histories and my advocacy in human trafficking legal cases, it highlights the survival strategies these workers adopt in response to digital carceral surveillance. The paper introduces the concept of the digital imperial shackle, which reveals the punitive mechanisms of racialized, sexual, migrant, and moral control within U.S. imperialism. Despite the constraints of these digital carceral systems, Asian migrant massage workers utilize non-digital strategies to navigate their daily lives. This research reinterprets their survival tactics as a form of visceral knowledge, challenging the prevailing discourses on the intersection of digital technology, trafficking, and anti-sex work regimes.
Benjamin, R. (2019). Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Codes. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
2.
BernardA. (2019). The triumph of profiling: The self in digital Culture. Polity.
3.
BeutinL. (2023). The anti-trafficking apparatus has a racial justice problem. In KempadooK.ShihE. (Eds.), White supremacy, racism and the coloniality of anti-trafficking (pp. 47–63). Routledge.
4.
BluntW.WolfA. (2020). Erased: The impact of FOSTA-SESTA and the removal of Backpage on sex workers. Anti-Trafficking Review, 14, 117–121. https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.201220148
5.
BorisE.ParreñasR. S. (2010). Introduction. In BorisE.ParreñasR. S. (Eds.), Intimate labors: Cultures, technologies, and the politics of care (pp. 1–12). Stanford University Press.
California Secretary of State. (2012). The state of human trafficking in California report. http://oag.ca.gov/human-trafficking (Accessed February 20, 2024).
8.
CarawayN.. (2008). 'Do No Harm': The Asian Female Migrant and Feminist Debates in the Global Anti-trafficking Movement. In FergusonKathyMironescoMonique (Eds.), Gender and Globalization in Asian and the Pacific: Method, Practice, Theory. University of Hawai'i Press.
9.
CCLP(2011). Human Trafficking Online: The Role of Social Networking Sites and Online Classifieds. University of Southern California.
10.
ChoR. J. (2023). Wronged by rescuers: Perspectives of Asian migrant defendants of the human trafficking interventions courts in New York. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 34(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2023.2241348
11.
EhrenreichB.HochschildA. R. (2003). Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy. Henry Holt and Company.
FreemanN. K.KskinB. B.BottG. J. (2022). Collaborating with local and federal law enforcement for disrupting sex trafficking networks. INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics, 52(5), 446–459. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2022.1126
14.
HighS.LittleE. (2014). Introduction. In HighS.LittleE.DuongT. R. (Eds.), Remembering mass violence: Oral history, new media and performance (pp. 3–32). University of Toronto Press.
15.
HirataL. C. (1979). Free, indentured, enslaved: Chinese prostitutes in nineteenth-century America. Signs, 5(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/493680
16.
HughesD. (2002). The use of new communications and information technologies for sexual exploitation of women and children. Hastings Women’s Law Journal, 13(1), 129–148.
17.
KaunA. (2024). Prison Media: incarceration and the infrastructure of work and technology. The MIT Press.
18.
KempadooK.ShihE. (2023). White supremacy, racism and the coloniality of anti-trafficking. Routledge.
MilivojevicS.MooreH.SegraveM.(2020). Freeing the Modern Slaves, One Click at a Time: Theorising human trafficking, modern slavery, and technology. Anti-Trafficking Review(14), 16–32. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.14197/atr.201220142
NellisM. (2012). The GPS satellite tracking of sex offenders in the USA. In BrayfordJ.CoweF.DeeringJ. (Eds.), Sex offenders: Punish, help, change or control? (pp. 238–256). Routledge.
24.
OutshoornJ. (2005). The political debates on prostitution and trafficking of women. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 12(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxi004
25.
Polaris. (2018). Human trafficking in illicit massage businesses. Report, Washington, DC, U.S., January.
26.
PollockD. (2005). Introduction. In PollockD. (Ed.), Remembering: Oral history performance (pp. 1–15). Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
SarkarS. (2015). Use of technology in human trafficking networks and sexual exploitation: A cross-sectional multi-country study. Transnational Social Review, 5(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2014.991184
28.
ShihE. (2018). Duplicitous freedom: Moral and material care work in anti-trafficking rescue and rehabilitation. Critical Sociology, 44(7–8), 1077–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920517751589
29.
ShihE. (2021). The trafficking deportation pipeline: Asian body work and the auxiliary policing of racialized poverty. Feminist Formations, 33(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2021.0003
ThakorM.BoydD. (2013). Networked trafficking: Reflection on technology and the anti-trafficking movement. Dialectical Anthropology, 37, 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-012-9286-6
32.
The United Nations. (2021, October 30). Traffickers abusing online technology, UN crime prevention agency warns. UN News. https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/10/1104392 (Accessed March 27, 2024).
WootenT. (2021). ‘The streets are my home’: Black male sex offender, hypersurveillance, and the liminality of home. Feminist Formations, 33(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2021.0002
