Ethnic Differences in Adaptation: Sino- Vietnamese Refugees in the United States 1

Abstract

This article examines the differences in adaptive behavior manifested by Sino-Vietnamese and ethnic Vietnamese refugees resettled in two major areas of the United States. Contingency analyses of a survey of 602 refugees interviewed in Illinois and California confirm the disadvantage of the Chinese group with respect to both acculturation and economic self-sufficiency variables. Although the two groups differ statistically in their pre-arrival characteristics and encountered somewhat different socioeconomic circumstances in the course of resettlement, adaptive differences remain after pre-arrival characteristics and resettlement context have been controlled. The adverse effect of Chinese ethnicity on adaptation is especially noticeable for the refugee expected to be most adaptable by virtue of their more favorable socioeconomic backgrounds and of the more facilitative circumstances of their resettlement.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bach

, and Bach

1980 “Employment Patterns of Southeast Asian Refugees”, Monthly Labor Review, 103(10): 31–38. Oct.

Barth

1969 “Introduction”. In Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Cultural Difference. Edited by Barth

Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

Chiswick

1980 “Immigrant Earning Patterns by Sex, Race, and Ethnic Groupings”, Monthly Labor Review, 103: 22–25. Oct.

Chiswick

1979 “The Economic Progress of Immigrants: Some Apparently Universal Patterns”. In Contemporary Economic Problems 1979. Edited by Fellner

Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

Condominas

, and Pottier

1983 Les Refugees Originaires de l'Asie du Sud-Est. Paris: La Documentation Francaise.

Debre

1976 Les Chinois de la Diaspora Paris: Olivier Orban.

Goldlust

, and Richmond

1974 “A Multivariate Model of Immigrant Adaptation”, International Migration Review, 8(2): 193–225.

Haller

1973 “Recurring Themes”. In The Peoples of Philadelphia. Edited by Davis

, and Haller

Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Hirschman

1982 “Immigrants and Minorities: Old Questions for New Directions in Research”, International Migration Review, 16(2): 474–490.

10.

Hosek

1982 “The AFDC- Unemployed Fathers’ Program: Determinants of Participation and Implications for Welfare Reform”. In Welfare Reform in America. Edited by Sommers

Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff.

11.

Lieberson

1963 Ethnic Patterns in American Cities. New York: Free Press.

12.

Park

1950 Race and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

13.

Purcell

1951 The Chinese in South East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

14.

Rosenberg

1968 The Logic of Survey Analysis. New York: Basic Books.

15.

Skinner

G.W.

1951 Report on the Chinese in Southeast Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program Data Paper.

16.

Strand

1984 “Employment Predictors among Indochinese Refugees”, International Migration Review, 18(1): 50–64.

17.

Tsai

M.K.

1968 Les Chinois au Sud-Vietnam. Paris: Bibliotheque Nationale.

18.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1985 Southeast Asian Refugee Self-Sufficiency Study. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

19.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1983 Survey of the Social, Psychological, and Economic Adaptation of Vietnamese Refugees in the U.S. 1975–1979. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

20.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Refugee Resettlement 1982a Refuge Resettlement Program; Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

21.

Yancey

, Ericksen

, and Juliani

1976 “Emergent Ethnicity: A Review and Reformulation”, American Sociological Review, 41: 391–402.