The effects of household composition on the employment of female immigrants from the Dominican Republic residing in New York City and women residing in the Dominican Republic are examined. The analysis indicates that context is more important than group culture in explaining the labor force participation of Dominican women. Dominican women residing in New York with children and no spouse present are less likely to be employed than are either women who have spouses or who have neither spouses nor children – the same pattern exists for women of another important Hispanic immigrant group in New York: Colombians. The reverse pattern holds in the Dominican Republic, where women living in households with spouse present are least likely to be employed. The presence of adult men other than the spouse in the household has effects consistent with those for spouse in both contexts – increasing women's odds of being employed in New York but decreasing them in the Dominican Republic. Structural factors in the Dominican Republic and New York City contexts that might account for the differing dynamics are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngelR. and TiendaM.1982 “Determinants of Extended Household Structure: Cultural Pattern or Economic Need,” American Journal of Sociology, 87(6): 1360–1383. May.
2.
ArizpeL.1983 “Relay Migration and the Survival of the Peasant Household.” In Toward a Political Economy of Urbanization in Third World Countries. Ed. SafaH.Delhi: Oxford University Press.
3.
BeanF. D., SwicegoodC. G. and KingA. G.1985 “Role Incompatibility and the Relationship between Fertility and Labor Supply among Hispanic Women.” In Hispanics in the U.S. Economy. Ed. BorjasG. J. and TiendaM.Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
4.
BeanF. D. and TiendaM.1987The Hispanic Population of the United States.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5.
BrayD.1984 “Economic Development: The Middle Class and International Migration in the Dominican Republic,” International Migration Review, 18(2):217–236.
6.
BretonR.1964 “Institutional Completeness of Ethnic Communities and the Personal Relations of Immigrants,” American Journal of Sociology, 70:193–205.
7.
BrowningH. L.1971 “Migrant Selectivity and the Growth of Large Cities in Developing Societies.” In Rapid Population Growth: Consequences and Policy Implications. Ed. National Academy of Sciences. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
8.
BumpassL. L.1990 “What's Happening to the Family? Interactions between Demographic and Institutional Change,” Demography, 27(4):483–498. November.
9.
CaldwellJ.C.1982Theory of Fertility Decline.London: Academic Press.
10.
FarleyR. and AllenW.R.1987The Color Line and the Quality of Life in AmericaNew York: Russell Sage Foundation.
11.
GarfinkelI. and OrrD.1974 “Welfare Policy and the Employment Rate of AFDC Mothers,” National Tax Journal, 27:275–284. July.
12.
GarrisonV. and WeissC. I.1979 “Dominican Family Networks and United States Immigration Policy: A Case Study,” International Migration Review, 13(2):264–283.
13.
GilbertsonG. and GurakD. T.1993 “Broadening the Enclave Debate: The Labor Market Experience of Dominican and Colombian Men in New York City,” Sociological Forum, 8(2):205–220. June.
14.
GilbertsonG. and GurakD. T.1992 “Household Transitions in the Migrations of Dominicans and Colombians to New York,” International Migration Review, 26(1):22–45.
15.
GoldscheiderC. and UhlenbergP.R.1969 “Minority Group Status and Fertility,” American Journal of Sociology, 74(4):361–372.
16.
GrasmuckS. and PessarP.R.1991Between Two Islands: Dominican International Migration.Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
GurakD. T.1987 “Family Formation and Marital Selectivity among Colombian and Dominican Immigrants in New York City,” International Migration Review, 21(2):275–298.
18.
GurakD. T.1980 “Assimilation and Fertility: A Comparison of Mexican American and Japanese American Women,” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2(3):219–239.
19.
GurakD. T. and CacesF.1992 “Migration Networks and the Shaping of Migration Systems.” In International Migration Systems: A Global Approach. Ed. KritzM. M., LimL. L. and ZlotnikH.London. Oxford University Press (Clarendon). Pp. 150–176.
20.
GurakD. T. and FalconL. M.1990 “The Puerto Rican Family and Poverty: Complex Paths to Poor Outcomes.” In Puerto Ricans: Breaking Out of the Cycle of Poverty. Ed. CruzJ. E.Washington, DC: National Puerto Rican Coalition, Inc. Pp. 39–83.
21.
GurakD. T., FalcónL. M., SandefurG. D. and TorrecilhaR. S.1994 “The Stability of Informal and Legal First Unions: A Comparison of Puerto Rican Women Residing in Puerto Rico and on the Mainland,” Population and Development Program Working Papers, 94.03. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
22.
GurakD. T. and GilbertsonG.1990 “Female Headship and the Migration Process: An Event-History Analysis of Marital Disruption among Dominican and Colombian Immigrants,” Population and Development Program Working Papers, 2.11. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
23.
GurakD. T. and KritzM. M.1982 “Female Employment in the Dominican Republic: A Dynamic Perspective,” American Sociological Review, 42(6):810–818. December.
24.
HancockP.1986 “The Effect of Welfare Eligibility on the Labor Force Participation of Women of Mexican Origin in California,” Population Research and Policy Review, 5:163–185.
25.
HarrisM.1977Cannibals and King: The Origins of Cultures.New York: Random House.
26.
HosmerD. W. and LemeshowS.1989Applied Logistic Regression.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
27.
HoustounM. F., KramerR. G. and BarrettJ. M.1984 “Female Predominance in Immigration to the United States since 1930: A First Look,” International Migration Review, 18(4):908–963.
28.
KasardaJ. D.1989 “Urban Industrial Transition and the Underclass,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 501:26–47. January.
29.
KennedyR. E.1973 “Minority Group Status and Fertility: The Irish,” American Sociological Review, 38(1): 85–96. February.
30.
KodrasJ. E.1986 “The Spatial Perspective in Welfare Analysis,” Cato Journal, 6(1):77–83. Spring/Summer.
31.
LevyF.1979 “The Labor Supply of Female Household Heads, or AFDC Work Incentives Don't Work Too Well,” The Journal of Human Resources, 14(1):76–97.
32.
MasonK. O. and PalanV. T.1981 “Female Employment and Fertility in Peninsular Malaysia: The Maternal Role Incompatibility Hypothesis Reconsidered,” Demography18:549–575.
33.
MasseyD.S. and EggersM. L.1990 “The Ecology or Inequality: Minorities and the Concentration of Poverty, 1970–1980,” American Journal of Sociology, 95(5):1153–1188. March.
34.
MasseyD. S. and García EspañaF.1987 “The Social Process of International Migration,” Science, 237:733–738. August 14.
35.
McLanahanS. S.1988 “Family Structure and Dependency: Early Transitions to Female Household Headship,” Demography, 25(1):1–16. February.
36.
McLanahanS. and GarfinkelI.1989 “Single Mothers, the Underclass, and Social Policy,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 501:92–104. January.
37.
O'NeillJ.1986 “Transfers and Poverty: Cause and/or Effect?” Cato Journal, 6(1):55–76.
38.
OppenheimerV. K.1979 “Structural Sources of Economic Pressure for Wives to Work: An Analytical Frame-work,” Journal of Family History, 4:177–197. Summer.
39.
OrtizV.1986 “Changes in the Characteristics of Puerto Rican Migrants from 1955 to 1980,” International Migration Review, 20(3):612–628. Fall.
40.
PessarP. R.1994 “Sweatshop Workers and Domestic Ideologies: Dominican Women in New York's Apparel Industry,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 18(1):127–142.
41.
PessarP. R.1984 “The Linkage between the Household and Workplace of Dominican Women in the U.S.,” International Migration Review, 18(4):1188–1211.
42.
PessarP. R.1982 “The Role of Households in International Migration and the Case of the U.S.-bound Migration from the Dominican Republic,” International Migration Review, 16:342–364.
43.
PlotnickR. D.1990 “Welfare and Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing: Evidence from the 1980s,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52:735–746. August.
44.
PortesA. and BachR. L.1985Latin Journey: Cuban and Mexican Immigrants in the United States.Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
PresserH. B.1989 “Can We Make Time for Children? The Economy, Work Schedules, and Child Care,” Demography, 26(4):523–543. November.
46.
RankM. R.1986 “Family Structure and the Process of Exiting from Welfare,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48:607–618. August.
47.
RanneyS. and KossoudjiS. A.1984 “The Labor Market Experience of Female Migrants: The Case of Temporary Mexican Migration to the U.S.,” International Migration Review, 18(4):1120–1143.
48.
RitcheyP.N.1975 “The Effect of Minority Group Status on Fertility: A Re-examination of Concepts,” Population Studies, 29(2):249–257. July.
49.
SafaH. I.1984 “Female Employment and the Social Reproduction of the Puerto Rican Working Class,” International Migration Review, 18(4):1168–1187.
50.
Sassen-KoobS.1989The Informal Economy.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
51.
SassierS.1991 “The Impact of Ethnicity and Household Structure on Women's Labor Force Participation: New York City in 1910,” Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, Cincinnati.
52.
SimonR. J. and DeLeyM.1984 “The Work Experience of Undocumented Mexican Women Migrants in Los Angeles,” International Migration Review, 18(4):1212–1229.
53.
TiendaM. and AngelR.1982 “Headship and Household Composition among Blacks, Hispanics, and Other Whites,” Social Forces, 61(2):508–531. December.
54.
TiendaM. and GlassJ.1985 “Household Structure and Labor Force Participation of Black, Hispanic and White Mothers,” Demography, 22(3):381–394.
55.
UgaldeA., BeanF. and CardenasG.1979 “International Migration from the Dominican Republic: Findings from a National Survey,” International Migration Review, 13(2):235–254.
56.
WaiteL. J.1980 “Working Wives and the Family Life Cycle,” American Journal of Sociology, 86(2):272–294.
57.
WaldingerR.1986Through the Eye of the Needle: Immigrants and Enterprises in New York's Garment Trades.New York: New York University Press.
58.
WilsonW. J.1987The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
