Written dialogue journals are intended to improve writing and encourage positive social skills by promoting individualized written discussions between a teacher and students' emotional and behavioral needs. This study investigated expressive writing using dialogue journals with five elementary students with emotional and behavioral disturbance (EBD), using a multiple baseline design across baseline, intervention, maintenance, and generalization phases. Students were randomly assigned to treatment order to meet randomization test assumptions. Baseline data were collected from student responses to traditional writing prompts. Individualized dialogue journals, in which students and teachers communicated daily to observed social behavioral issues, were implemented for the duration of the intervention. Dependent measures included student attention to task, length and quality of student written entries, and a student satisfaction survey. Visual analysis indicated an increase in time on task for all participants, and an increase in length of writing and writing quality for four of the five participants. Randomization tests applied to these data yielded significant results for all writing measures. In addition, survey results suggested that participants regarded the dialogue journals with mild satisfaction overall. Implications for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertiniJ. (1990). Coherence in deaf students' writing. In PeytonJ. K. (Ed.), Students and teachers writing together: Perspectives on journal writing (pp. 127–136). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. (TESOL).
2.
AndersonJ. A., KutashK., & DuchnowskiA. J. (2001). A comparison of the academic progress of students with EBD and students with LD.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders9, 106–115.
3.
BromleyK. D. (1996). Buddy journals for ESL and native English speaking students.TESOL Journal, 4, 7–11.
4.
CooperJ. O. (1974). Measurement and analysis of behavioral techniques.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
5.
CullinanD., & SabornieE. J. (2004). Characteristics of emotional disturbance in middle and high school students.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 157–168.
6.
De La PazS., & GrahamS. (1997). Effects of dictation and advanced planning instruction on the composing of students with writing and learning problems.Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 203–222.
7.
DunlapG., & ChildsK. E. (1996). Intervention research in emotional and behavioral disorders: An analysis of studies from 1980 to 1993.Behavioral Disorders, 14, 157–165.
8.
EnglertC. S., & MariageT. V. (1991). Shared understandings: Structuring the writing experience through dialogue.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 330–342.
9.
FarleyJ. W., & FarleyS. L. (1987). Interactive writing and gifted children: Communication through literacy.Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 99–106.
10.
GerstenR., & BakerS. (2001). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis.Elementary School Journal, 101, 251–272.
11.
GerstenR., BakerS., & EdwardsL. (1999). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities.ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education, Reston, VA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED439532).
12.
GrahamS., & HarrisK. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In SwansonH. L., HarrisK. R., & GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323–344). New York: Guilford Press.
13.
GrantJ. O., LazarusB. B., & PeytonH. (1992). The use of dialogue journals with students with exceptionalities.Teaching Exceptional Children, 24, 22–24.
14.
HallenbeckM. J. (2002). Taking charge: Adolescents with LD assume responsibility for their own writing.Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 222–246.
15.
HolmesV. L., & MoultonM. R. (1997). Dialogue journals as an ESL learning strategy.Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40, 616–621.
16.
KazdinA. (1984). Statistical analyses for single-case experimental designs. In BarlowM. D., & HersenM. (Eds.), Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.), pp. 285–324. New York: Pergamon.
17.
LandrumT. J., TankersleyM., & KauffmanJ. M. (2003). What is special about special education for students with emotional or behavioral disorders?Journal of Special Education, 37, 148–156.
18.
LaneK. L. (2004). Academic instruction and tutoring interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: 1990 to the present. In RutherfordR. B.Jr., QuinnM. M., & MathurS. R (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 462–486). New York: Guilford Press.
19.
MacArthurC. A. (1998). Word processing with speech synthesis and word prediction: Effects on the dialogue journal writing of students with learning disabilities.Learning Disability Quarterly, 21, 151–166.
20.
MacArthurC. A. (1999). Word prediction for students with severe spelling problems.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 158–172.
21.
MastropieriM. A., ScruggsT. E., KlingermanK., MohlerL., JeffsT., BoonR. (2001). University e-mail mentors for elementary students with disabilities: Attitudinal and literacy effects. In ScruggsT. E., & MastropieriM. A. (Eds.), Technological applications: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 15, pp. 173–186). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
22.
MooneyP., DennyR. K., & GunterP. L. (2004). The impact of NCLB and the reauthorization of IDEA on academic instruction of students with emotional or behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 29, 237–246.
23.
NelsonJ. R., BennerG. J., LaneK., & SmithB. W. (2004). Academic achievement of K–12 students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Exceptional Children, 71, 59–73.
24.
ParsonsonB. S., & BaerD. M. (1992). The visual analysis of data, and current research into the stimuli controlling it. In KratochwillT. R., & LevinJ. R. (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 15–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
PeytonJ. K. (1997). Dialogue journals: Interactive writing to develop language and literacy.Emergency Librarian, 24, 46–48.
26.
PeytonJ. K., & SeyoumM. (1989). The effect of teacher strategies on students' interactive writing: The case of dialogue journals.Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 310–334.
27.
PeytonJ. K., & StatonJ. (1993). Dialogue journals in the multilingual classroom: Building language fluency and writing skills through written interaction.Norwood, NJ: Ablex. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED354789)
28.
PierceC. D., ReidR., & EpsteinM. H. (2004). Teacher mediated interventions for children with EBD and their academic outcomes.Remedial and Special Education, 25, 175–188.
29.
ReganK. (2003). Using dialogue journals in the classroom: Forming relationships with students with emotional disturbance.Teaching Exceptional Children, 36, 36–41.
30.
ReidL. (1997). Exploring the ways that dialogue journaling affects how and why students write: An action research project.Teaching and Change, 5, 50–57.
31.
RyanJ. B., PierceC. D., ReidR., & EpsteinM. H. (2004). Peer mediated interventions for children with EBD and their academic outcomes.Remedial and Special Education, 25, 330–341.
32.
ScruggsT. E., & MastropieriM. A. (1986). Academic characteristics of behaviorally disordered and learning disabled children.Behavioral Disorders, 11, 184–190.
33.
StatonJ. (1987). The power of responding in dialogue journals. In FulwilerT. (Ed.), The journal book (pp. 47–63). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
34.
SullivanJ. (1998). The electronic journal: Combining literacy and technology.Reading Teacher, 52, 90–103.
35.
TawneyJ., & GastD. (1984). Single subject research in special education.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
36.
TodmanJ. B., & DugardP. (2001). Single-case and small-n experimental designs: A practical guide to randomization tests.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). To assure the free appropriate public education of all children with disabilities: Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Washington, DC: Author.
38.
YoungT. A., & CrowM. L. (1992). Using dialogue journals to help students deal with their problems.Clearing House, 65, 307–310.
39.
WehbyJ. H., LaneK. L., & FalkK. B. (2003). Academic instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 194–197.
40.
WittJ. C., VanDerHeydenA. M., & GilbertsonD. (2004). Instruction and classroom management: Prevention and intervention research. In RutherfordR. B.Jr., QuinnM. M., & MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 426–445). New York: Guilford Press.
