Disproportionality of English Learners with Emotional and/or Behavioral Disorders: A Comparative Meta-Analysis with English Learners with Learning Disabilities
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2013
Disproportionality of English Learners with Emotional and/or Behavioral Disorders: A Comparative Meta-Analysis with English Learners with Learning Disabilities
Disproportionate representation of English learners in special education has been a longstanding and ongoing concern. However, research examining disproportionate representation of English learners receiving special education services for emotional and/or behavioral disorders (EBD) has been limited. To address this gap, a meta-analysis of disproportionate representation of English learners in the EBD category was conducted and the results were compared with same sample results for students receiving special education services for learning disabilities (LD). Based on five studies, the results of the meta-analysis indicate that English learners are disproportionately underrepresented in the EBD category generally and when compared with students in the LD category. Differences in odds ratios were found across educational contexts (i.e., school-level, district-level, state-level, and nationally), indicating different patterns of representation. Implications and potential reasons for disproportionality are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnastasiouD., & KauffmanJ. M. (2012). Disability as cultural difference: Implications for special education.Remedial and Special Education33(2), 139–149. doi: 10.1177/0741932510383163
2.
ArtilesA. J. (2003). Special education's changing identity: Paradoxes and dilemmas in views of culture and space.Harvard Education Review73(2), 164–202.
3.
ArtilesA. J., BalA., TrentS. C., & ThoriusK. K. (2012). Placememt of culturally and linguistically diverse students in programs for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Contemporary trends and research needs. In BakkenJ. P., ObiakorF. E., & RotatoriA. F. (Eds.), Behavioral disorders: Identification, assessment, and instruction of students with EBD (pp. 107–127). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
4.
*ArtilesA. J., KlingnerJ. K., SullivanA., & FierrosE. G. (2010). Shifting landscapes of professional practices: English learner special education placement in English-only states. In GandaraP., & HopkinsM. (Eds.), Forbidden language: English learners and restrictive language policies (pp. 102–117). New York: Teachers College Press. Note. References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.
5.
ArtilesA. J., KozleskiE. B., TrentS. C., OsherD., & OrtizA. (2010). Justifying and explaining disproportionality, 1968–2008: A critique of underlying views of culture.Exceptional Children76(3), 279–299.
6.
ArtillesA. J., RuedaR., SalazarJ. J., & HigredaI. (2005). Within-group diversity in minority disproportionate representation: English language learners in urban school districts.Exceptional Children71(3), 283–300.
7.
AudS., HussarW., PlantyM., SnyderT., BiancoK., FoxM. …, & DrakeL. (2010). The Condition of Education 2010 (NCES 2010–028). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Educatio.Washington, DC.
CardN. A. (1912). Applied meta-analysis for social science research.New York: Guilford Press.
11.
ChinnP. C., & HughesS. (1987). Representation of minority students in special education classes.Remedial and Special Education8(1), 41–46. doi:10.1177/074193258700800406
12.
DanforthS. (1995). Toward a critical theory approach to lives considered emotionally disturbed.Behavioral Disorders20(2), 136–143.
13.
*De ValenzuelaJ. S., CopelandS. R., QiC. H., & ParkM. (2006). Examining educational equity: Revisiting the disproportionate representation of minority students in special education.Exceptional Children72(4), 425–441.
14.
DonovanM. S., & CrossC. T. (2002). Minority students in special education.Washington, DC: National Research Council.
15.
FierrosE. G., & ConroyJ. E. (2002). Double jeopardy: An exploratory study of restrictiveness of race in special education. In LosenD. (Ed.), Minority issues in special education (pp. 39–70). Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University and the Harvard Education Publishing Group.
16.
FornessS. R., & KnitzerJ. (1992). A new proposed definition and terminology to replace “serious emotional disturbance” in Individuals with Disabilities Act.School Psychology Review21(1), 12–21.
17.
GerstenR., & WoodwardJ. (1994). The language-minority student and special education: Issues, trends, and paradoxes.Exceptional Children60(4), 310–322.
18.
GageN. A., LierheimerK. S., & GoranL. G. (2013). Characteristics of students with high-incidence disabilities broadly defined.Journal of Disability Policy Studies23(3), 168–178. doi:10.1177/1044207311425385
19.
HallahanD. P., & KauffmanJ. M. (1977). Labels, categories, behaviors: ED, LD, and EMR reconsidered.Journal of Special Education11(2), 140–149. doi:10.1177/002246697701100202
20.
HarryB., & KlingnerJ. K. (2006). Why are so many minority students in special education? Under-standing race and disability in schools.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
21.
HellerA., HoltzmanW. H., & MessickS. (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22.
*HopstockP. J., & StephensonT. G. (2003). Special report #2: Analysis of Office for Civil Rights (OCR) data related to LEP students: Descriptive study of services to LEP students with disabilities (Contract No. ED-00CO-0089), Report submitted to U.S. Department of Education, Office of English Language Acquisition. Arlington, VA: Development Associates, Inc.
23.
HospJ. L., & ReschlyD. J. (2003). Referral rates for intervention or assessment: A meta-analysis of racial differences.Journal of Special Education37(2), 67–80. doi:10.1177/00224669030370020201
24.
KauffmanJ. M. (1999). How we prevent the prevention of emotional and behavioral disorders.Exceptional Children65(4), 448–468.
25.
KauffmanJ. M., & LandrumT. J. (2009). Politics, civil rights, and disproportional identification of students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Exceptionality17(4), 177–188. doi:10.1080/09362830903231903
26.
Larry P. v. Riles, 343 F. Supp. 1306 (N.D. Cal. 1 972), order granting preliminary injunction, aff'd, 502 F.2d 963 (9th Cir. 1974), 495 F. Supp. 926 (N. D. Cal. 1979), decision on merits, aff'd, No. 80–427 (9th Cir. Jan. 23, 1984), No. C-71–2270 RFP (Sept. 25, 1986), order modify judgment, 793 F.2d 969 (9th Cir. 1994).
27.
LoeS. A., & MirandaA. H. (2002). Assessment of culturally and linguistically diverse learners with behavioral disorders. In CartledgeG., TarnK. Y., LoeS. A., MirandaA. H., LambertM. C., KeaC. D., & Simmons-ReedE. (Eds.), Culturally and linguistically diverse students with behavioral disorders (pp. 25–36). Arlington, VA: Council for Behavioral Disorders.
28.
MacMillanD., & ReschlyD. (1998). Overrepresentation of minority students: The case for greater specificity or reconsideration of the variables examined.Journal of Special Education32(1), 15–24.
29.
MercerJ. R. (1973). Labeling the Mentally Retarded: Clinical and Social System Perspectives on Mental Retardation.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30.
MerrellK. W., & WalkerH. M. (2004). Deconstructing a definition: Social maladjustment versus emotional disturbance and moving the EBD field forward.Psychology in the Schools41(8), 899–910.
31.
National Research Council. (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
32.
OsherD., CartledgeG., OswaldD., SutherlandK. S., ArtilesA. J., & CoutinhoM. (2004). Cultural and linguistic competency and disproportionate representation. In RutherfordR. B., QuinnM. M., & MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 54–77). New York, NY: Guilford.
33.
OswaldD. P., CoutinhoM. J., BestA. M., & SinghN. N. (1999). Ethnic representation in special education: The influence of school related economic and demographic variables.Journal of Special Education32(4), 194–206.
34.
OswaldD. P., CoutinhoM. J., BestA. L., & NguyenN. (2001). Impact of sociodemographic characteristics on the identification rates of minority students as having mental retardation.Mental Retardation39, 351–367.
35.
ParishT. (2002). Racial disparities in the identification, funding, and provision of special education. In LosenD. (Ed.), Minority issues in special education (pp. 15–38). Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University and the Harvard Education Publishing Group.
36.
RhodesW. C. (1977). The illusion of normalcy.Behavioral Disorders2(2), 122–129.
37.
RiccioC. A., OchoaS. H., GarzaS. G., & NeroC. L. (2003). Referral of African American children for evaluation of emotional and behavioral concerns.Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners6, 1–12.
38.
SaundersW. M., & MarcellettiD.J. (2013). The gap that can't go away: The catch-22 of reclassification in monitoring the progress of English learners.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis35, 139–156.
39.
*SheltonL. (2007). Caught in the middle: Overrepresentation of middle school second language learners in special education. (Doctoral dissertation) Retrieved from University of Michigan Dissertation Express. (AAT 3295262)
SkibaR. J., Poloni-StaudingerL., GalliniS., SimmonsA. B., & Feggins-AzzizR. (2006). Disparate access: The disproportionality of African American students with disabilities across educational environments.Exceptional Children72(4), 411–424.
42.
*SullivanA. L. (2011). Disproportionality in special education identification and placement of English language learners.Exceptional Children77(3), 317–334.
43.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). Mental health: Culture, race, and ethnicity–A supplement to mental health: A report of the Surgeon General.Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services.
44.
WalkerH. M., FornessS. R., KauffmanJ. M., EpsteinM. H., GreshamF. M., NelsonC. M., & StrainP. S. (1998). Macro-social validation: Referencing outcomes in behavioral disorders to societal isssues and problems.Behavioral Disorders24(1), 7–18.
45.
WeryJ. J., & CullinanD. (2013). State definitions of emotional disturbance.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders21, 45–52.
46.
*ZehlerA. M., FleischmanH. L., HopstockP. J., StephensonT. G., PendzickM. L., & SapruS. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities: Volume 1 research report (Contract No. ED00CO-0089). Report submitted to U.S. Department of Education, Office of English Language Acquisition. Arlington, VA: Development Associates, Inc.
