Research in the area of behavioral disorders suggests chronic problems in the underreferral and underrepresentation of at-risk children. Systematic preschool screening procedures for identifying such students are conspicuous by their absence in both the professional literature and actual practice. The present study adapted the elementary version of Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders (SSBD) to a select preschool Head Start population. Primary modifications of the SSBD were made in the decision rules determining which children pass through the multiple gated system to the next stage. A secondary modification was the elimination of Stage III observation of Academic Engaged Time (AET) because of its developmental inappropriateness for preschoolers. Of the Stage II subjects, 58% passed into Stage III peer social behavior observations and 5% of the Stage III sample was referred to child study teams for further assessment. Implications for further research with this population, utilizing large-scale field testing and validation procedures, are presented and discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchenbachT. M., & EdelbrockC. S. (1979). The child behavior profile: II. Boys aged 12–16 and girls aged 6–11 and 12–16.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 223–233.
2.
AchenbachT. M., & EdelbrockC. S. (1981). Behavior problems and competencies reported by parents of normal and disturbed children aged 4–16.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46(1).
3.
AchenbachT.M., & EdelbrockC.S. (1986). Manual for the teacher's report form and teacher version of the child behavioral profile.Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
4.
AlgozzineB., ChristensonS., & YsseldykeJ. E. (1982). Probabilities associated with referral-to-placement process.Teacher Education and Special Education, 5, 19–23.
5.
BalowB. (1979). Definitional and prevalence problems in behavior disorders of children.School Psychology Digest, 8, 348–353.
6.
BarnettW. S., & EscobarC. M. (1990). Economic costs and benefits of early intervention. In MeiselsS. J., & ShonkoffJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 127–143). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BeareP. L., & LynchE. C. (1986). Underidentification of preschool children at risk for behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 11, 177–183.
8.
BersoffD. N. (1977). Special education for preschoolers: Impact of the education for all handicapped children act of 1975.Journal of School Psychology, 15, 190–191.
9.
BolstadO. D., & JohnsonS. M. (1977). The relationship between teachers' assessment of students and students actual behavior in the classroom.Child Development, 4, 570–578.
10.
BowerE. M. (1960). Early identification of emotionally handicapped children in school.Springfield, IL: Thomas.
11.
BowerE. M. (1982). Defining emotional disturbance: Public policy and research.Psychology in the Schools, 19(1), 55–60.
12.
BrophyJ., & EvertsonC. (1981). Student characteristics and teaching.New York: Longman.
13.
CenterD. B., & ObringerJ. (1987). A search for variables affecting underidentification of behaviorally disordered students.Behavioral Disorders, 12, 169–174.
14.
ColeJ. D., WattN., MarkmanH., WestS., HawkinsD., AsarnowJ., RameyS. L., ShureM., & LongB. (1991). The science of prevention: A conceptual framework and some directions for a national research program.Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
15.
Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders. (1987). Position paper on definition and identification of students with behavioral disorders.Reston, VA: CCBD, a Division of The Council for Exceptional Children.
16.
EisertD. C., WalkerH. M., SeversonH. H., & BlockA. (1989). Patterns of social-behavioral competence in behavior disordered preschoolers.Early Childhood Development and Care, 41, 139–152.
17.
FeilE. (in press). Multiple gated identification and screening system for preschool behavior disorders: Preliminary results report (Student-Initiated Project). U.S. Department of Education, Research in Education of the Handicapped Program.
18.
FischerM., RolfJ. E., HaaziJ. E., & CummingsL. (1984). Follow-up of a preschool epidemiological sample: Cross-age continuities and predictions of later adjustment with internalizing and externalizing dimensions of behavior.Child Development, 55, 137–150.
19.
FisherR. A. (1970). Statistical methods for research workers (14th ed.). New York: Hafner Publishing.
20.
FornessS. R., & KnitzerJ. (1990). A new proposed definition and terminology to replace “serious emotional disturbance” in education of the handicapped act.Washington, DC: The National Mental Health and Special Education Coalition.
21.
GerberM., & SemmelM. (1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process.Educational Psychologist, 19(3), 137–148.
22.
GreenwoodC., WalkerH. M., ToddN., & HopsH. (1979). SAMPLE: Social assessment manual for preschool level.Delray Beach, FL: Educational Achievement Systems.
23.
GreshamF. M. (1985). Behavior disorder assessment: Conceptual, definitional, and practical consideration.School Psychology Review, 14, 465–509.
24.
GrosenickJ., & HuntzeS. (1983). National needs analysis in behavioral disorders: Severe behavioral disorders.Columbia, MO: University of Missouri, Department of Special Education.
25.
GuralnickM., & BennettC. (1987). Effectiveness of early intervention.New York: Academic Press.
26.
HaringN. (1987). Assessing and managing behavior disabilities.Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
27.
KauffmanJ. (1987). Foreword. In HaringN. G. (Ed.), Assessing and managing behavior disabilities (pp. ii–v). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
28.
KohnM. (1977). Social competence, symptom, and underachievement in childhood: A longitudinal perspective.New York: Wiley.
29.
Mardell-CzudnowskiC. D. (1980). Validity and reliability studies with DIAL.Journal of Special Education, 17, 32–45.
30.
Office of Management and Budget. (1992, April). National head start/public school early childhood transition study.Washington, DC: Author.
31.
RameyC. T., CampbellF. A., BurchinalM., & SparlingJ. (1991). Early intervention produces long-lasting cognitive achievement and reduced school failure. Paper presented at New Directions in Child and Family Research: Shaping Head Start in the 90s, Arlington, VA.
32.
RolfJ. E., & HaaziJ. E. (1977). Identification of preschool children at-risk and some guidelines for primary prevention. In AlbeeG. W., & JoffeJ. M. (Eds.), Primary prevention of psychopathology (pp. 121–152). Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
33.
RossA. (1980). Psychological disorders of children: A behavioral approach to theory, research, and therapy (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
34.
SimmerM. L. (1983). The warning signs of school failure: An updated profile of the at-risk kindergarten child.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 3, 17–27.
35.
SinclairE. (in press-a). Early identification of preschoolers with special needs in Head Start.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education.
36.
SinclairE. (in press-b). Head Start children at risk: Prenatal drug exposure.Exceptional Children.
37.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1989). Fifteenth annual report to the Congress of the United States on services provided to children with disabilities in the Head Start program.Washington DC: Administration for Children, Youth, and Families.
38.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1991). Seventeenth annual report to the Congress of the United States on services provided to children with disabilities in the Head Stan program.Washington DC: Administration for Children, Youth, and Families.
39.
VincentL., BrownL., & Getz-SheflelM. (1981). Integrating handicapped and typical children during the preschool years: The definition of best educational practice.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1, 17–24.
40.
WalkerH. M., & FabreT. (1987). Assessment of behavioral disorders in the school setting: Issues, problems, and strategies revisited. In HaringN. (Ed.), Measuring and managing behavior disorders (pp. 198–243). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
41.
WalkerH. M., SeversonH. H., StillerB., WilliamsG., HaringN., ShinnM., & TodisB. (1988). Systematic screening of pupils in the elementary age range at risk for behavior disorders: Development and trial testing of a multiple gating model.Remedial and Special Education, 9, 8–14.
42.
WalkerH. M., & SeversonH. H. (1990a). Systematic screening for behavior disorders.Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
43.
WalkerH. M., & SeversonH. H. (1990b). Systematic screening for behavior disorders — administration and scoring manual.Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
44.
WalkerH. M., & SeversonH. H. (1990c). Systematic screening for behavior disorders — observation training video tape.Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
45.
WalkerH. M., SeversonH. H., TodisB. J., Block-PedegoA. E., WilliamsG. J., HaringN. G., & BarckleyM. (1990). Systematic screening for behavior disorders (SSBD): Further validation, replication, and normative data.Remedial and Special Education, 11, 32–46.
46.
WeikartD. (1979). Cognitive oriented preschool curriculum. In HohmannM., BernatB., & WeikartD. (Eds.), Young children in action (pp. 298–312). Detroit, MI: Hi-Scope Press.
47.
WhiteK. R. (1991). Longitudinal studies of the effects of alternative types of early intervention for children with disabilities (Annual Report for Project Period October 1, 1990-September 30, 1991). Logan: Utah State University, Early Intervention Research Institute.
48.
YsseldykeJ., AlgozzineB., & EppsS. (1982). A logical and empirical analysis of current practices in classifying students as handicapped.Exceptional Children, 49, 234–243.
49.
ZiglerE., & FreedmanJ. (1987). Early experience, malleability, and Head Start. In GallagherJ. J., & RameyC. T. (Eds.), The malleability of children (pp. 85–95). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
