Abstract
Background
Retroaortic right internal thoracic artery grafting has failed to gain popularity. We aimed to delineate patient correlates of eligibility, distribution of targets, and effects of target remoteness on outcome and risk of retroaortic bleeding.
Methods
Data of 861 patients undergoing skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting (2007–2012) were analyzed according to retroaortic (n = 300) or T-graft configuration. Retroaortic graft subgroups were categorized according to proximal (first obtuse marginal, ramus) or distal (2nd, 3rd, or sequential 1st-2nd obtuse marginal) circumflex artery targets.
Results
LOESS curve analyses revealed that taller patients had a higher likelihood of retroaortic grafting. The distribution of 337 retroaortic graft targets (300 patients) was first obtuse marginal in 74.5%, 2nd marginal in 12.4%, ramus in 11.2%, 3rd marginal in 1.9% and sequential 1st-2nd marginal in 12.3%. The success rate in reaching proximal and distal circumflex artery targets was 97% and 30%, respectively, 5-year survival (92.2%) and freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (85.8%) were comparable between proximal and distal retroaortic graft subgroups. Distal circumflex artery targets had no effect on the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. The incidence of retroaortic bleeding from skeletonized retroaortic grafts was 0.6%.
Conclusions
Taller patients have a greater likelihood of qualifying for retroaortic grafting. This technique is highly reproducible for proximal but not distal circumflex artery targets. Distal circumflex artery targets are not independent correlates of early or late adverse outcomes. The risk of retroaortic bleeding is low despite retroaortic right internal thoracic artery skeletonization.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.