Validity assessment of a simulation module for robot-assisted thoracic lobectomy

Abstract

Background

Training for robot-assisted thoracic lobectomy remains an issue, prompting the development of virtual reality simulators. Our aim was to assess the construct and face validity of a new thoracic lobectomy module on the RobotiX Mentor, a robotic surgery simulator. We also aimed to determine the acceptability and feasibility of implementation into training.

Methods

This prospective, observational, and comparative study recruited novice (n = 16), intermediate (n = 9), and expert (n = 5) participants from King's College London, the 25th European Conference on General Thoracic Surgery, and the Society of Robotic Surgery conference 2018. Each participant completed two familiarization tasks followed by the Guided Robotic Lobectomy module and an evaluation questionnaire. Outcome measures were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

Construct validity was demonstrated in 12/21 performance evaluation metrics. Significant differences between groups were found in all metrics including: time taken to complete module, vascular injury, respect for tissue, number of stapler firings, time instruments out of view, number of instrument collisions, and number of movements. Participants deemed aspects of the simulator (mean 3/5) and module (3/5) as realistic and rated the simulator as both acceptable (3.8/5) and feasible (3.8/5) for robotic surgical training.

Conclusions

Face validity, acceptability, and feasibility were established for the thoracic lobectomy module of the RobotiX Mentor simulator. Moderate evidence of construct validity was also demonstrated. With further work, this simulation module could help to reduce the initial part of the learning curve for trainees and decrease the risk of errors during live training.

Keywords

Computer simulation Clinical competence Pneumonectomy Robotic surgical procedures Simulation training User-computer interface

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Iribarne

Easterwood

Chan

et al . The golden age of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery: current and future perspectives. Future Cardiol 2011; 7:333–346.

Balasundaram

Aggarwal

Darzi

Short-phase training on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance in tele-robotic surgery.

Int J Med Robot 2008; 4:139–145.

Hung

Zehnder

and Patil

et al. Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol 2011; 186:1019–1024.

Valdis

Chu

Schlachta

and Kiaii

Validation of a novel virtual reality training curriculum for robotic cardiac surgery: a randomized trial. Innovations (Phila) 2015; 10:383–388.

Valdis

Chu

Schlachta

and Kiaii

Evaluation of robotic cardiac surgery simulation training: A randomized controlled trial.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 151:1498–505.e2.

Whittaker

Aydin

Raison

et al . Validation of the RobotiX Mentor Robotic Surgery Simulator. J Endourol 2016; 30:338–346.

Fann

Sullivan

Skeff

et al . Teaching behaviors in the cardiac surgery simulation environment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145:45–53.

Smelt

Soppa

Nowell

Barnard

and Jahangiri

A survey of cardiothoracic surgical training in the United Kingdom: realities of a 6-year integrated training program.

Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100:2314–2319.

Jensen

Bjerrum

Hansen

Petersen

Pedersen

and Konge

A new possibility in thoracoscopic virtual reality simulation training: development and testing of a novel virtual reality simulator for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy.

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015; 21:420–426.

10.

Solomon

Bizekis

Dellis

et al . Simulating video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a virtual reality cognitive task simulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141:249–255.