Effects of Selected Variables on Musicians’ Ratings of High-Level Piano Performances

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether judgments of solo performances recorded at a well-known international piano competition would be affected by musical characteristics such as style (classic period versus early 20th-century Russian) and tempo (slow versus fast). Evaluators rated performances on six test items: tone quality, note accuracy, rhythmic accuracy, expressiveness, adherence to style and overall impression. The effects of four between-subjects variables were examined: audio versus audiovisual presentation, undergraduate versus graduate/faculty, gender, and pianists versus non-pianists.

Results from the 227 evaluators revealed main effects for treatment, style and major: audiovisual presentations were rated higher than audio only presentations, performances of Russian music were rated higher than performances of classic music, and pianists rated performances higher than did non-pianists. The treatment effect was due to a significant treatment by major interaction, and applied only to non-pianists. Gender was involved in a number of three- and four-way interactions that are difficult to interpret.

Pearson r correlations were calculated for ratings of the 16 performances on the overall impression test item. The mean correlation for the 120 pairs of ratings was .33 – low but statistically significant. Intraclass correlations revealed no significant differences between the two levels of all four between-subjects variables.

Keywords

adjudication competitions evaluation piano

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beehr, T. A. , & Gilmore, D. (1982). Applicant attractiveness as a perceived job relevant variable in selection. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 607–617.

Cann, A. , Siegfried, W. , & Pearce, L. (1981). Forced attention to specific applicant qualifications: Impact on physical attractiveness and sex of applicant bias. Personnel Psychology, 34, 65–75.

Cash, T. , Gillen, B. , & Burns, D. (1977). Sexism and beautyism in personnel consultant decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 301–310.

Dipboye, R. , Arvey, R. , & Terpstra, D. (1977). Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resume evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 288–294.

Ekholm, E. (1994). The effect of guided listening on evaluation of solo vocal performance. Master’s thesis, McGill University.

Elliott, C. (1995). Race and gender as factors in judgments of musical performance. Council for Research in Music Education Bulletin, 127 (Winter), 50–56.

Eysenck, H. J. (1939). The validity of judgments as a function of the number of judges. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25(6), 650–654.

Fiske, H. E. (1975). Judge-group differences in the rating of secondary school trumpet performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23(3), 186–196.

Fiske, H. E. (1977a). New insights into performance evaluation. Music Educators Journal, Dec., 23–25.

10.

Fiske, H. E. (1977b). Relationship of selected factors in trumpet performance adjudication reliability. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25(4), 256–263.

11.

Gilmore, D. , Beehr, T. , & Love, K. (1986). Effects of applicant sex, applicant physical attractiveness, type of rater, and type of job on interview decisions. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 103–109.

12.

Griswold, P. A. , & Chroback, D. A. (1981). Sex–role associations of music instruments and occupations by gender and major. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29(1), 57–62.

13.

Heilman, M. , & Saruwatari, L. (1979). When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and non-managerial jobs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360–372.

14.

Kaplan, R. (1978). Is beauty talent? Sex interaction in the attractiveness halo effect. Sex Roles, 4(2), 195–204.

15.

Killian, J. (1990). Effect of model characteristics on musical preference of junior high students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38(2), 115–123.

16.

Landy, D. , & Sigall, H. (1974). Beauty is talent: task evaluations as a function of the performer’s physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 299–304.

17.

LeBlanc, A. (1979). Generic style music preferences of fifth-grade students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 27(4), 255–270.

18.

LeBlanc, A. , & Sherrill, C. (1986). Effect of vocal vibrato and performer’s sex on children’s music preference. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34(4), 222–237.

19.

McCrary, J. (1993). Effects of listeners’ and performers’ race on music preferences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41(3), 200–211.

20.

Rodzinski, R. (2001). The subjectivity of ranking. In Eleventh Van Cliburn International Piano Competition (p. 54-54). Fort Worth, TX: Van Cliburn Foundation.

21.

Shahani, C. , Dipboye, R. , & Gehrlein, T. (1993). Attractiveness bias in the interview: Exploring the boundaries of an effect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 14, 317–328.

22.

Wapnick, J. , Darrow, A.-A. , Kovacs, J. , & Dalrymple, L. (1997). Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluation of vocal performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(3), 470–479.

23.

Wapnick, J. , & Ekholm, E. (1997). Evaluation of vocal production in solo voice performance. Journal of Voice, 11(4), 429–436.

24.

Wapnick, J. , Flowers, P. , Alegant, M. , & Jasinskas, L. (1993). Consistency in piano performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41(4), 282–292.

25.

Wapnick, J. , Kovacs-Mazza, J. , & Darrow, A.-A. (1998). Effects of performer attractiveness, stage behavior, and dress on violin performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(4), 510–521.

26.

Wapnick, J. , Kovacs-Mazza, J. , & Darrow, A.-A. (2000). Effects of performer attractiveness, stage behavior, and dress on evaluation of children’s piano performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48(4), 323–336.