Closed policy networks,broken chains of communication and the stories behind an ‘entrepreneurial policy’: The case of NHS Local Improvement Finance Trust (NHS LIFT)

Abstract

This article draws on original case study research to develop more general conclusions about policy-making processes under New Labour. I discuss the Local Improvement Finance Trust (LIFT) as an exemplar of new trends in contemporary capitalist welfare regimes, and I compare some of the enterprise rhetoric surrounding and justifying LIFT to the experiences of National Health Service managers and clinicians in my case study. I consider why many of the voices that I studied appear to remain unheard outside private interviews and meetings, and conclude that changes in the public sector are helping to create closed networks that are unresponsive to concerns expressed ‘on the ground’. Finally, I consider some implications of my data for the future of neo-liberal welfare policies.

Keywords

health care neo-liberalism privatization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bourn, J. (2003) ‘Speech to the PPP Forum’ [http://www.pppforum.com/government/bourn_speech100903.html], accessed 15 January 2006.

Department of Health (DH) (n.d.) ‘NHS LIFT FAQ’ [http://www.dh.gov.uk/ProcurementAndProposals/PublicPrivatePartnership/NHSLIFT/AboutNHSLIFT/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4076707&chk=iVdaOG], accessed 21 February 2006.

Department of Health (DH) (2001) ‘LIFT Prospectus’ [http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/07/66/58/04076658.pdf], accessed 21 February 2006.

Fairclough, N. (2000) New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge .

Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge .

Gough, I. (1979) The Political Economy of the Welfare State. Basingstoke: Palgrave .

Hay, C. (1998) ‘The Tangled Webs We Weave: The Discourse, Strategy and Practice of Networking’, pp. 33–51 in D. Marsh (ed.) Comparing Policy Networks. Buckingham: Open University Press .

Hewitt, P. (2005) ‘Annual Health and Social Lecture’ [http://www.dh.gov.uk/NewsHome/Speeches/SpeechesList/SpeechesArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4124484&chk=Pf%2Bt%2Br], accessed 15 January 2006.

Jessop, B. (1994) ‘The Transition to Post-Fordism and the Schumpeterian Workfare State’, pp. 251–279 in R. Burrows and B. Loader (eds) Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State? London: Routledge .

10.

Lawson, R. and Taylor-Gooby, P. (1993) Markets and Managers: New Issues in the Development of Welfare. Bristol: Open University Press .

11.

Leys, C. (2005) ‘The End of Freedom from Fear?’ [http://www.keepournhspublic.com/pdf/ProfColinLeystextofPaulNoonelecture.pdf], accessed 23 February 2006.

12.

Milburn, A. (2004) ‘The Future of Public-Private Partnerships’ [http://www.pppforum.com/documents/milburn_birmingham_speech.pdf], accessed 23 February 2006.

13.

National Audit Office (NAO) (2005) Innovation in the NHS: Local Improvement Finance Trusts. London: The Stationery Office .

14.

Partnerships for Health (PfH) (n.d.) ‘LIFT Strategic Partnering Agreement Version 4’ [http://www.partnershipsforhealth.co.uk/Publications/14.3.1%20SPA%20V4.1%20update%20October%202004.doc], accessed 23 February 2006.

15.

Pollock, A. M. (2004) NHS Plc: The Privatisation of our Health Care. London: Verso .

16.

Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC) (2001) Investing in Primary Care: A Report for the Department of Health. Obtained by the author under the 2000 Freedom of Information Act.

17.

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press .