This paper focuses on the new form of social participation created by information and communication technologies (ICTs), as experienced by an online professional community, SWForum, in Hong Kong. The group has expressed resistance and contributed to social welfare policy development since 1997, when frontline social workers were disempowered and lost their previously influential status. From this experience, we argue that the online community has created an arena for alternative discourse on social policy and it shows that the technology can be harnessed to create a more equitable participation in policy making in a society.
Barraket, J. ( 2005) ‘Online Opportunities for Civic Engagement? An Examination of Australian Third Sector Organisations on the Internet’ , Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society3(1): 17-30.
2.
Boehm, A. and Staples, L.H. ( 2002) ‘The Functions of the Social Worker in Empowering: The Voices of Consumers and Professionals’, Social Work47: 449-60.
3.
Brunsting, S. and Postmes, T. ( 2002) ‘Social Movement Participation in the Digital Age: Predicting Offline and Online Collective Action’, Small Group Research33(5): 525-54.
4.
Census and Statistics Department (2003a) Hong Kong Social and Economic Trends 2003 Edition. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
5.
Census and Statistics Department (2003b) Hong Kong Annual Digest of Statistics 2002. Hong KongGovernment Printer.
6.
Chiu, M.Y.L. ( 2006) ‘Survey on Pressure of NGO Social Workers in Hong Kong’. Hong Kong: Legislative Council Office of Fernando Cheung. (In Chinese)
7.
Christensen, K. and Levinson, D. ( 2003a) ‘Online Communities’, in K. Christensen and D. Levinson (eds) Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World, Vol. 3, pp. 1012-39. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
Christensen, K. and Levinson, D. ( 2003b) ‘Virtual Communities’, in K. Christensen and D. Levinson (eds) Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World, Vol. 4, pp. 1454-63. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
Clarke, J. and Newman, J. ( 1997) The Managerial State. London : SAGE.
10.
Coopers & Lybrand ( 1996) Social Welfare Department: Review of the Social Welfare Subvention System. Changing the Way NGOs are Funded. Hong Kong: Coopers & Lybrand.
11.
Cothrel, J. and Williams, R.L. ( 1999) ‘On-line Communities: Helping them Form and Grow’ , Journal of Knowledge Management3(1): 54-60.
12.
Cronauer, K. ( 2001) Activism and the Internet: Uses of Electronic Mailing Lists by Social Activists. New York: Social Science Research Council.
13.
Den Hond, F. and De Bakker, F.G.A. ( 2007) ‘Ideologically Motivated Activism: How Activist Groups Influence Corporate Social Change Activities’, Academy of Management Review32(3): 901-24.
14.
Etzioni, A. ( 2003) ‘Communitarianism’, in K. Christensen and D. Levinson (eds) Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World, Vol. 1, pp. 224-8. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
Ferguson, I. and Lavalette, M. ( 2006) ‘Globalization and Global Justice: Towards a Social Work of Resistance’, International Social Work49(3): 309-18.
16.
Fitzpatrick, T. ( 2003) ‘Introduction: New Technologies and Social Policy’ , Critical Social Policy23(2): 131-8.
17.
Foster, P. and Wilding, P. ( 2000) ‘Whither Welfare Professionalism?’ , Social Policy and Administration34(2): 143-59.
18.
Frans, D.J. ( 1993) ‘A Scale for Measuring Social Worker Empowerment’ , Research on Social Work Practice3(3): 312-28.
19.
Gutiérrez, L.M. ( 1994) ‘Beyond Coping: An Empowerment Perspective on Stressful Life Events’, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare21: 201-19.
20.
Hardina, D. ( 2005) ‘Ten Characteristics of Empowerment-oriented Social Service Organizations’, Administration in Social Work29(3): 23-42.
21.
Hick, S. F. and McNutt, J. G. (eds) (2002) Advocacy, Activism, and the Internet. Chicago: Lyceum Books, Inc.
22.
Holosko, M.J. ( 2001) ‘How Service Users Become Empowered in Human Service Organizations: The Empowerment Model’, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance14(3): 126-32.
23.
Hong Kong Government, Working Party on Social Welfare Policies and Services (1991) White Paper: Social Welfare into the 1990s and Beyond. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
24.
Jones, C. ( 1990) Promoting Prosperity: The Hong Kong Way of Social Policy . Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
25.
Jordan, T. ( 1999) Cyberpower: The Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet. London and New York : Routledge.
26.
Leung, Kam-chung A., the Financial Secretary (2003) Budget Speech by the Financial Secretary. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government.
27.
Parsloe, P. ( 1996) ‘The Concept of Empowerment in Social Work Practice’ , Hong Kong Journal of Social Work29(1): 1-11.
28.
Postmes, T. and Brunsting, S. ( 2002) ‘Collective Action in the Age of the Internet’ , Social Science Computer Review20(3): 290-301.
Reeves, P.M. ( 2001) ‘How Individuals Coping with HIV/AIDS Use the Internet’ , Health Education Research: Theory and Practice16(6): 709-19.
31.
Rheingold, H. ( 2000) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
32.
Smith, M. A. and Kollock, P. (eds) (1999) Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge.
33.
Social Welfare Department (2000) Social Welfare Services Lump Sum Grant Manual Edition 2. Hong Kong: Government Printer .
34.
Solomon, B. ( 1976) Black Empowerment: Social Work in Oppressed Communities . New York: Columbia University Press.
35.
Tsui, M.S. and Cheung, F.C.H. ( 2004) ‘Gone with the Wind: The Impacts of Managerialism on Human Services’, British Journal of Social Work34(3): 437-42.
36.
Turner, L.M. and Shera, W. ( 2005) ‘Empowerment of Human Service Workers: Beyond Intra-organizational Strategies’, Administration in Social Work29(3): 79-94.
37.
Webber, M.M. ( 1964) Explorations into Urban Structure. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press .
