Information technology plays a pivotal role in New Labour’s modernization programme. Here we report findings from a 2 year ethnographic study of the impact and origin of one such system, the Integrated Children’s System, which has been deployed in statutory children’s social care. We show how the ICS, by attempting to micro-manage work through a rigid performance management regime, and a centrally prescribed practice model, has disrupted the professional task, engendering a range of unsafe practices and provoking a gathering storm of user resistance. We attribute these paradoxical outcomes to inherent flaws in the design of ICS, which derive from the history of its development and its embodiment of an audit-driven, inspectorial ideology. We conclude with some suggestions for user-centred design and policymaking, which have relevance not only for children’s social care but for the public services in general.
Bell, M. ( 2008) ‘Put on ICS: Research Finds Disquiet with ICS’ , Community Care [http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2008/06/05/108421/analysis-of-the-integrated-childrens-system-pilots.html], accessed 20 May 2009.
2.
Bevan, G. and Hood, C. ( 2006) ‘What’s Measured is What Matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Care System’, Public Administration84(3): 517-38.
3.
Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Wastell, D., White, S. and Pithouse, A. ( 2010a) ‘Risk, Instrumentalism and the Humane Project in Social Work: Identifying the Informal Logics of Risk Management in Children’s Statutory Services’, British Journal of Social Work Advance Access [doi: 10.1093/ bjsw/bcq011].
4.
Broadhurst, K., Wastell, D., White, S., Hall, C., Peckover, S., Thompson, K., Pithouse, A. and Davey, D. (2010b) ‘Performing "Initial Assessment": Identifying the Latent Conditions for Error at the Front-Door of Local Authority Children’s Services’ , British Journal of Social Work40(2): 352-70.
5.
Calder, M. ( 2004) ‘Out of the Frying Pan into the Fire? A Critical Analysis of the Integrated Children’s System’, Child Care in Practice10(3): 225-40.
6.
Cleaver, H. and Walker, S. ( 2004) ‘From Policy to Practice: The Implementation of a New Framework for Social Work Assessments of Children and Families’ , Child and Family Social Work9: 81-90.
7.
Cleaver, H., Walker, S., Scott, S., Cleaver, D., Rose, W., Ward, H. and Pithouse, A. ( 2008) The Integrated Children’s System: Enhancing Social Work and Inter-Agency Practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
8.
Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) ( 2008) ‘Integrated Children’s System Evaluation: Summary of Key Findings’, Brief No. DCSF-RBX-02-08, January.
9.
Department for Children, Schools and Families ( 2009) ‘The Protection of Children in England: Action Plan. The Government’s Response to Lord Laming’ [ http://publications.dcsf.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/DCSFLaming.pdf], accessed 15 May 2009.
10.
Department of Health (1998) ‘LAC (98)28. The Quality Protects Programme: Transforming Children’s Services’ [http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Lettersandcirculars/LocalAuthorityCirculars/AllLocalAuthority/DH_4004387], accessed 20 May 2009.
11.
Department of Health (1999) ‘The Government’s Objectives for Children’s Social Services’ [http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4042822.pdf], accessed 20 May 2009.
12.
Department of Health (2000) Learning the Lessons: The Government’s Response to Lost in Care. London: The Stationery Office.
13.
Department of Health (2002) ‘Integrated Children’s System: Working with Children in Need and their Families. Consultation Document’ [http://www.everychildmatters.gov.uk/_files/ICS%20Consultation%20Document%20Dec%202002.pdf ], accessed 20 May 2009.
Eagleton, T. ( 2003) Sweet Violence: The Idea of the Tragic. Oxford: Blackwell.
16.
Eason, K. ( 2007) ‘Local Socio-technical Development in the National Programme for Information Technology’, Journal of Information Technology22: 257-64.
17.
Garrett, P.M. ( 1999) ‘Producing the Moral Citizen: The "Looking After Children" System and the Regulation of Children and Young People in Public Care’, Critical Social Policy19(3): 291-312.
18.
Garrett, P.M. ( 2002) ‘Yes Minister: Reviewing the "Looking After Children" Experience and Identifying the Messages for Social Work Research’ , British Journal of Social Work32: 831-46.
19.
Garrett, P.M. ( 2005) ‘Social Work’s "Electronic Turn": Notes on the Deployment of Information and Communication Technologies in Social Work with Children and Families’, Critical Social Policy25(4): 529-54.
20.
Garrett, P.M. ( 2009) ‘Transforming’ Children’s Services? Social Work, Neoliberalism and the ‘Modern’ World. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
21.
Horwath, J. ( 2002) ‘Maintaining a Focus on the Child?’ , Child Abuse Review11: 195-213.
22.
Hubbard, L., Mehan, H. and Stein, M.K. ( 2006) Reform as Learning. London: Routledge.
23.
Hughes, J.A., Sommerville, I., Bentley, R. and Randall, D. ( 1993) ‘Designing with Ethnography: Making Work Visible’ , Interacting with Computers5(2): 239-53.
24.
Jackson, S. and Kilroe, S. (eds) (1996) Looking After Children: Good Parenting, Good Outcomes Reader. London: HMSO.
25.
Jordan, B. ( 2001) ‘Tough Love: Social Work, Social Exclusion and the Third Way’, British Journal of Social Work31: 527-46.
26.
Keil, M. ( 1995) ‘Pulling the Plug: Management and the Problem of Project Escalation’, MIS Quarterly December: 421-7.
27.
Knight, T. and Caveney, S. ( 1998) ‘Assessment and Action Records: Will They Promote Good Parenting?’, British Journal of Social Work28: 29-43.
28.
Laming, Lord ( 2003) The Victoria Climbié Inquiry: Report of an Inquiry by Lord Laming. Norwich: The Stationery Office.
29.
Mähring, M. and Keil, M. ( 2008) ‘Information Technology Project Escalation: A Process Model’, Decision Sciences39(2): 239-72.
30.
Markus, M.L. ( 1983) ‘Power, Politics and MIS Implementation’ , Communications of the ACM26(6): 430-44.
31.
Markus, M.L. and Benjamin, R.I. ( 1997) ‘The Magic Bullet Theory in IT-enabled Transformation’ , Sloan Management Review Winter: 55-68.
32.
Mehan, H. ( 1999) ‘Oracular Reasoning in a Psychiatric Team: The Resolution of Conflict in Language’, pp. 160-77 in A. Jaworski and N. Coupland (eds) The Discourse Reader. London : Routledge .
33.
Mumford, E. ( 2003) Redesigning Human Systems. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
34.
Munro, E. ( 2005) ‘What Tools Do We Need to Improve Identification of Child Abuse?’, Child Abuse Review14(6): 374-88.
35.
Norman, D.A. ( 1998) The Design of Everyday Things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Parton, N. (ed.) (1997) Child Protection and Family Support: Tensions, Contradictions and Possibilities . London: Routledge.
37.
Pava, C.H.P. ( 1983) Managing New Office Technology: An Organizational Strategy . New York: The Free Press .
38.
Peckover, S., Hall, C. and White, S. (2009) ‘From Policy toPractice: The Implementation and Negotiation of Technologies in Everyday Child Welfare’, Children & Society23(2): 136-48.
39.
Seden, J., Sinclair, R., Robbins, D. and Pont, C. ( 2001) ‘Studies Informing the Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families’. Norwich : The Stationery Office.
40.
Shaw, I., Bell, M., Sinclair, I., Sloper, P., Mitchell, W., Dyson, P., Clayden, J. and Rafferty, J.(2009) ‘An Exemplary Scheme? An Evaluation of the Integrated Children’s System’, British Journal of Social Work39(4): 613-26.
41.
Stivers, R. ( 2001) Technology as Magic: The Triumph of the Irrational . New York: Continuum.
Unison (2008) ‘Lord Laming Progress Report on Safeguarding: SUMMARY of UNISON Memorandum - December 2008’ [http://www.unison.org.uk/acrobat/B4364b.pdf ], accessed 20 May 2009.
44.
Visocky O.’Grady, J. ( 2006) A Designer’s Research Manual. Gloucester, MA: Rockport.
45.
Walsh, S.H. ( 2004) ‘The Clinician’s Perspective on Electronic Health Records and How they Can Affect Patient Care’, British Medical Journal328 (15 May): 1184-7.
46.
Wastell, D.G. ( 1999) ‘The Human Dimension of the Software Process’ , pp. 165-99 in J.-C. Derniame, B. A. Kaba and D. Wastell (eds) Software Process: Principles, Methodology and Technology, Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1500. Berlin: Springer.
47.
Wastell, D.G., McMaster, T. and Kawalek, P. ( 2007) ‘The Rise of the Phoenix: Methodological Innovation as a Discourse of Renewal’, Journal of Information Technology22: 59-68.
48.
Wastell, D., White, S., Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Peckover, S. and Pithouse, A. ( 2010) ‘Children’s Services in the Iron Cage of Performance Management: Street Level Bureaucracy and the Spectre of Švejkism’ , International Journal of Social Welfare forthcoming.
49.
Weick, K. ( 1987) ‘Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability’ , California Management Review29(2): 112-27.
50.
Winter, K. ( 2006) ‘Widening our Knowledge Concerning Young Looked After Children: The Case for Research Using Sociological Models of Childhood’ , Child and Family Social Work11: 55-64.
