Use and Pitfalls of Allometry: A Valuable Tool in Comparisons and Extrapolations between Species and in Ethical Considerations concerning the use of One Species to Model Another

Abstract

Where research on one species is justified on the grounds that it will provide benefits to another, the strength of the ethical case depends critically on whether findings can be extrapolated meaningfully. Valid extrapolation depends on the species being sufficiently similar in respects critical to the research and on knowledge of the bases and effects of salient differences. Many biological parameters vary with body weight (W) between species. When species of small size are used to model larger ones, the influence of size on the rates of physiological, immunological and other processes must be taken into account. Between species, the rates of physiological processes tend to increase with W^0.75, and the durations of physiological events tend to increase with W^0.25. Providing potential pitfalls are understood, allometric scaling enables valid comparisons and extrapolations between species. Knowledge of these principles is crucial also in making predictions about many aspects of animals’ biology and has application also in making sound ethical judgments about the justifiability of extrapolations between species concerning the wide range of processes linked to rates of metabolism.

Keywords

allometry interspecies variation laboratory animal care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Calder

W.A.

III (1984). Size, Function and Life History. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.

Riviere

J.E.

, Martin-Jiminez

, Sundlof

S.F.

, & Craigmill

A.L.

(1997). Interspecies allometric analysis of the comparative pharmacokinetics of 44 drugs across veterinary and laboratory animal species. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 20, 453–463.

Kleiber

(1975). The Fire of Life, second edition. New York, USA: Robert E. Kreiger.

Kirkwood

J.K.

(1996). Nutrition of captive and free-living wild animals. In BSAVA Manual of Small Animal Nutrition and Feeding (ed. Kelly

, & Wills

), pp. 235–243. Cheltenham, UK: British Small Animal Veterinary Association.

Baggot

J.D.

(1982). Disposition and fate of drugs in the body. In Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (ed. Booth

N.H.

, & Macdonald

L.E.

), pp. 36–69. Ames, Iowa, USA: Iowa State University Press.

Sedgwick

C.J.

(1986). Scaling and anaesthesia for primates. In Primates: the Road to Self-Sustaining Populations (ed. Benirschke

), pp. 816–822. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag.

Mordenti

(1985). Forecasting cephalosporin and monobactam antibiotic half-lives in humans from data collected in laboratory animals. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 27, 887–891.

Harvey

P.H.

, & Mace

G.M.

(1982). Comparisons between taxa and adaptive trends: problems of methodology. In Current Problems in Sociobiology (ed. King's College Sociobiology Group), pp. 343–361. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kirkwood

J.K.

, & Bennett

P.M.

(1992). Approaches and limitations to the prediction of energy requirements in wild animal husbandry and veterinary care. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 51, 117–124.

10.

Hayssen

, & Lacy

R.C.

(1985). Basal metabolic rates in mammals: taxonomic differences in allometry of BMR and body mass. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 81A, 741–754.

11.

Heussner

A.A.

(1982). Energy metabolism and body size. I. Is the 0.75 mass exponent a statistical artifact? Respiration Physiology 48, 1–12.

12.

Bennett

P.M.

, & Harvey

P.H.

(1987). Active and resting metabolism in birds: allometry, physiology and ecology. Journal of Zoology 213, 327–363.

13.

Blaxter

K.L.

(1989). Energy Metabolism in Animals and Man. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

14.

West

G.B.

, Brown

J.H.

, & Enquist

B.J.

(1997). A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science, New York 276, 122–126.

15.

Kirkwood

J.K.

(2001). Dose estimation from body weight. In The Veterinary Formulary (ed. Bishop

), fifth edition, p. 644. London, UK: The Pharmaceutical Press.

16.

House of Lords Select Committee (2002). Select Committee Report on Animals in Scientific Procedures, Vol. 1, 81 pp. London, UK: The Stationery Office Limited.