Little is known about how food interacts with the intestinal epithelium during the digestion process. However, it is known that ingredients in food can modulate the intestinal barrier, and have the potential to disrupt homeostasis of the gut. Here, we characterise a conditionally immortalised canine intestinal epithelial cell (cIEC) line for use in in vitro assays, to assess the effect of food ingredients on intestinal barrier function, permeability, cell health, and inflammation. Microscopy and flow cytometry confirmed that cIECs had a phenotype consistent with those of epithelial origin, and were able to differentiate to mature enterocytes. The cIECs also formed a monolayer when grown on Transwell® inserts, producing functional tight junctions between the cells. In contrast to the human-derived Caco-2 cell line, transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) was increased in cIECs in response to two different raw ingredients. The exposure of cIECs to known inflammatory stimuli and raw ingredients induced the nuclear translocation of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cells (NF-κB). This work demonstrates the value of a unique cIEC in vitro model to study the effects of food ingredients on canine intestinal function and health, and supports continued efforts to reduce and refine the use of animals in scientific research.
HalpernM.D., & DenningP.W. (2015). The role of intestinal epithelial barrier function in the development of NEC. Tissue Barriers3, e1000707.
2.
WatsonA.J., & HughesK.R. (2012). TNF-alphainduced intestinal epithelial cell shedding: Implications for intestinal barrier function. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1258, 1–8.
3.
HollanderD. (1999). Intestinal permeability, leaky gut, and intestinal disorders. Current Gastroenterology Reports1, 410–416.
4.
BalimaneP.V., ChongS., & MorrisonR.A. (2000). Current methodologies used for evaluation of intestinal permeability and absorption. Journal of Pharmacological & Toxicological Methods44, 301–312.
5.
LiedelJ.L., GuoY., YuY., ShiouS.R., ChenS., PetrofE.O., HuS., MuschM.W., & ClaudE.C. (2011). Mother's milk-induced Hsp70 expression preserves intestinal epithelial barrier function in an immature rat pup model. Pediatric Research69, 395–400.
6.
HochmanJ., & ArturssonP. (1994). Mechanisms of absorption enhancement and tight junction regulation. Journal of Controlled Release29, 253–267.
7.
BallardS.T., HunterJ.H., & TaylorA.E. (1995). Regulation of tight-junction permeability during nutrient absorption across the intestinal epithelium. Annual Review of Nutrition15, 35–55.
8.
FarhadiA., BananA., FieldsJ., & KeshavarzianA. (2003). Intestinal barrier: An interface between health and disease. Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology18, 479–497.
9.
QuaroniA., & BeaulieuJ.F. (1997). Cell dynamics and differentiation of conditionally immortalized human intestinal epithelial cells. Gastroenterology113, 1198–1213.
10.
WengX.H., BeyenbachK.W., & QuaroniA. (2005). Cultured monolayers of the dog jejunum with the structural and functional properties resembling the normal epithelium. American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal & Liver Physiology288, G705–G717.
11.
SambuyY., De AngelisI., RanaldiG., ScarinoM.L., StammatiA., & ZuccoF. (2005). The Caco-2 cell line as a model of the intestinal barrier: Influence of cell and culture-related factors on Caco-2 cell functional characteristics. Cell Biology & Toxicology21, 1–26.
12.
AngelisI.D., & TurcoL. (2001). Caco-2 cells as a model for intestinal absorption. In Current Protocols in Toxicology, pp. 20.6.1–20.6.15. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
13.
AmashehM., SchlichterS., AmashehS., MankertzJ., ZeitzM., FrommM., & SchulzkeJ.D. (2008). Quercetin enhances epithelial barrier function and increases claudin-4 expression in Caco-2 cells. Journal of Nutrition138, 1067–1073.
14.
RaimondiF., SantoroP., BaroneM.V., PappacodaS., BarrettaM.L., NanayakkaraM., ApicellaC., CapassoL., & PaludettoR. (2008). Bile acids modulate tight junction structure and barrier function of Caco-2 monolayers via EGFR activation. American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal & Liver Physiology294, G906–G913.
15.
LipkieT.E., BanavaraD., ShahB., MorrowA.L., McMahonR.J., JouniZ.E., & FerruzziM.G. (2014). Caco-2 accumulation of lutein is greater from human milk than from infant formula despite similar bioaccessibility. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research58, 2014–2022.
16.
PriceD.B., AcklandM.L., BurksW., KnightM.I., & SuphiogluC. (2014). Peanut allergens alter intestinal barrier permeability and tight junction localisation in Caco-2 cell cultures. Cellular Physiology & Biochemistry33, 1758–1777.
17.
AndreC.M., EversD., ZiebelJ., GuignardC., HausmanJ.F., BonierbaleM., Zum FeldeT., & BurgosG. (2015). In vitro bioaccessibility and bioavailability of iron from potatoes with varying vitamin C, carotenoid, and phenolic concentrations. Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry63, 9012–9021.
18.
GuriA., LiY., & CorredigM. (2015). Interfacial dilational properties of tea polyphenols and milk proteins with gut epithelia and the role of mucus in nutrient adsorption. Food & Function6, 3642–3651.
19.
ShinH.S., JungS.Y., BackS.Y., DoJ.R., & ShonD.H. (2015). Arctigenin from Fructus arctii (seed of burdock) reinforces intestinal barrier function in Caco-2 cell monolayers. Evidence Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine2015, 368105.
20.
Castellanos-GonzalezA., CabadaM.M., NicholsJ., GomezG., & WhiteA.C.Jr. (2013). Human primary intestinal epithelial cells as an improved in vitro model for Cryptosporidium parvum infection. Infection & Immunity81, 1996–2001.
21.
KauffmanA.L., GyurdievaA.V., MabusJ.R., FergusonC., YanZ., & HornbyP.J. (2013). Alternative functional in vitro models of human intestinal epithelia. Frontiers in Pharmacology4, 79.
22.
SearchingerT., HansonC., RanganathanJ., LipinskiB., WaiteR., WinterbottomR., DinshawA., & HeimlichR. (2013). Creating a Sustainable Food Future: Interim Findings: A Menu of Solutions to Sustainably Feed More than 9 billion People by 2050, 154 pp. Washington, DC, USA: World Resources Institute.
23.
BolandM.J., RaeA.N., VereijkenJ.M., MeuwissenM.P.M., FischerA.R.H., van BoekelM.A.J.S., RutherfurdS.M., GruppenH., MoughanP.J., & HendriksW.H. (2013). The future supply of animal-derived protein for human consumption. Trends in Food Science & Technology29, 62–73.
24.
AikingH. (2011). Future protein supply. Trends in Food Science & Technology22, 112–120.
25.
van der SpiegelM., NoordamM.Y., & van der Fels-KlerxH.J. (2013). Safety of novel protein sources (insects, microalgae, seaweed, duckweed, and rape-seed) and legislative aspects for their application in food and feed production. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety12, 662–678.
BoisenS., & FernándezJ.A. (1997). Prediction of the total tract digestibility of energy in feedstuffs and pig diets by in vitro analyses. Animal Feed Science & Technology68, 277–286.
28.
VolpeDA. (2011). Drug-permeability and transporter assays in Caco-2 and MDCK cell lines. Future Medicinal Chemistry3, 2063–2077.
29.
WangK., JinX., ChenY., SongZ., JiangX., HuF., ConlonM.A., & ToppingD.L. (2016). Polyphenol-rich propolis extracts strengthen intestinal barrier function by activating AMPK and ERK signaling. Nutrients8, E272.
30.
MariadasonJ.M., BarklaD.H., & GibsonP.R. (1997). Effect of short-chain fatty acids on paracellular permeability in Caco-2 intestinal epithelium model. American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal & Liver Physiology272, G705–G712.
31.
HoudeM., LapriseP., JeanD., BlaisM., AsselinC., & RivardN. (2001). Intestinal epithelial cell differentiation involves activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase that regulates the homeobox transcription factor CDX2. Journal of Biological Chemistry276, 21,885–21,894.
32.
RomanoA.C., EspanaE.M., YooS.H., BudakM.T., WolosinJ.M., & TsengS.C. (2003). Different cell sizes in human limbal and central corneal basal epithelia measured by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science44, 5125–5129.
33.
ImamovO., MoraniA., ShimG.J., OmotoY., Thulin-AnderssonC, WarnerM., & GustafssonJ.A. (2004). Estrogen receptor (3 regulates epithelial cellular differentiation in the mouse ventral prostate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA101, 9375–9380.
GradisnikL., TrapecarM., RupnikM.S., & VelnarT. (2015). HUIEC, human intestinal epithelial cell line with differentiated properties: Process of isolation and characterisation. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift127, 204–209.
36.
HartsockA., & NelsonW.J. (2008). Adherens and tight junctions: Structure, function and connections to the actin cytoskeleton. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta1778, 660–669.
37.
MollR. (1998). Cytokeratins as markers of differentiation in the diagnosis of epithelial tumors. Subcellular Biochemistry31, 205–262.
38.
AbreuM.T. (2010). Toll-like receptor signalling in the intestinal epithelium: How bacterial recognition shapes intestinal function. Nature Reviews Immunology10, 131–144.
39.
McClureR., & MassariP. (2014). TLR-dependent human mucosal epithelial cell responses to microbial pathogens. Frontiers in Immunology5, 1–13.
40.
HornefM.W., FrisanT., VandewalleA., NormarkS., & Richter-DahlforsA. (2002). Toll-like receptor 4 resides in the Golgi apparatus and colocalizes with internalized lipopolysaccharide in intestinal epithelial cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine195, 559–570.
41.
AbreuM.T., FukataM., & ArditiM. (2005). TLR signaling in the gut in health and disease. Journal of Immunology174, 4453–4460.
42.
OtteJ.M., CarioE., & PodolskyD.K. (2004). Mechanisms of cross hyporesponsiveness to Toll-like receptor bacterial ligands in intestinal epithelial cells. Gastroenterology126, 1054–1070.
ThakurB.K., DasguptaN., TaA., & DasS. (2016). Physiological TLR5 expression in the intestine is regulated by differential DNA binding of Sp1/Sp3 through simultaneous Sp1 dephosphorylation and Sp3 phosphorylation by two different PKC isoforms. Nucleic Acids Research44, 5658–5672.
NagatakeT., FujitaH., MinatoN., & HamazakiY. (2014). Enteroendocrine cells are specifically marked by cell surface expression of claudin-4 in mouse small intestine. PLoS One9, e90638.
47.
KozanP.A., McGeoughM.D., PeñaC.A., MuellerJ.L., BarrettK.E., MarchellettaR.R., & SivagnanamM. (2015). Mutation of EpCAM leads to intestinal barrier and ion transport dysfunction. Journal of Molecular Medicine93, 535–545.
48.
SchnellU., CirulliV., & GiepmansB.N.G. (2013). EpCAM: Structure and function in health and disease. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta1828, 1989–2001.
49.
LeiZ., MaedaT., TamuraA., NakamuraT., Yama zakiY., ShiratoriH., YashiroK., TsukitaS., & HamadaH. (2012). EpCAM contributes to formation of functional tight junction in the intestinal epithelium by recruiting claudin proteins. Developmental Biology371, 136–145.
50.
AhujaD., Saenz-RoblesM.T., & PipasJ.M. (2005). SV40 large T antigen targets multiple cellular pathways to elicit cellular transformation. Oncogene24, 7729–7745.
51.
TrzpisM., McLaughlinP.M., de LeijL.M., & HarmsenM.C. (2007). Epithelial cell adhesion molecule: More than a carcinoma marker and adhesion molecule. American Journal of Pathology171, 386–395.
52.
SpenceJ.R., MayhewC.N., RankinS.A., KuharM.F., VallanceJ.E., TolleK., HoskinsE.E., KalinichenkoV.V., WellsS.I., ZornA.M., ShroyerN.F., & WellsJ.M. (2011). Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into intestinal tissue in vitro.Nature, London, 470, 105–109.
53.
SambruyY., FerruzzaS., RanaldiG., & De AngelisI. (2001). Intestinal cell culture models: Applications in toxicology and pharmacology. Cell Biology & Toxicology17, 301–317.
54.
KaulmannA., LegayS., SchneiderY.J., HoffmannL., & BohnT. (2016). Inflammation related responses of intestinal cells to plum and cabbage digesta with differential carotenoid and polyphenol profiles following simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research60, 992–1005.
55.
MahlerG.J., ShulerM.L., & GlahnR.P. (2009). Characterization of Caco-2 and HT29-MTX cocultures in an in vitro digestion/cell culture model used to predict iron bioavailability. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry20, 494–502.
56.
SádeckáJ., & TóthováJ. (2007). Fluorescence spectroscopy and chemometrics in the food classification — a review. Czech Journal of Food Sciences25, 159–173.
57.
MandagereA.K., ThompsonT.N., & HwangK-K. (2002). Graphical model for estimating oral bioavailability of drugs in humans and other species from their Caco-2 permeability and in vitro liver enzyme metabolic stability rates. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry45, 304–311.
58.
RubasW., JezykN., & GrassG.M. (1993). Comparison of the permeability characteristics of a human colonic epithelial (Caco-2) cell line to colon of rabbit, monkey, and dog intestine and human drug absorption. Pharmaceutical Research10, 113–118.
59.
PrueksaritanontT., GorhamL.M., HochmanJ.H., TranL.O., & VyasK.P. (1996). Comparative studies of drug-metabolizing enzymes in dog, monkey, and human small intestines, and in Caco-2 cells. Drug Metabolism & Disposition24, 634–642.
60.
HeY.L., MurbyS., WarhurstG., GiffordL., WalkerD., AyrtonJ., EastmondR., & RowlandM. (1998). Species differences in size discrimination in the paracellular pathway reflected by oral bioavailability of poly(ethylene glycol) and D-peptides. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences87, 626–633.
