Three in vitro phototoxicity assays — the photohaemolysis assay, the haemoglobin (Hb) photo-oxidation assay, and the 3T3 cell neutral red uptake phototoxicity (3T3 NRU PT) assay — were evaluated for use as screening methods in predicting the phototoxicity of test substances. Twenty-seven test substances, including cosmetic ingredients and drugs, were assessed in this study. The phototoxicity predicted in each assay was compared with that in guinea-pigs. In total, nine phototoxic substances used in this study could be detected by some of the in vitro phototoxicity assays. Eleven test substances regarded as non-phototoxic in vivo were predicted as non-phototoxic in the in vitro assays. Of the eight false positives revealed in some of the in vitro assays, five are believed to be photo-allergens. This suggests that in vitro phototoxicity assays might not be able to discriminate clearly between in vivo phototoxicity and in vivo photo-allergy, because the mechanisms in both processes are based on photodynamic reactions. The predictability of the three in vitro assays was comparatively good, but positive predictive values were low. The equivalence values of the photohaemolysis assay, the Hb photo-oxidation assay and the 3T3 NRU PT assay were 81%, 70% and 70%, respectively. From these results, we suggest that the three in vitro phototoxicity assays could be used as screens in predicting phototoxicity.
DanielsF.J. (1965). A simple microbiological method for demonstrating phototoxic compounds. Journal of Investigative Dermatology44, 259–263.
2.
SugiyamaM., ItagakiH., & KatoS. (1994). Photohemolysis test and yeast growth inhibition assay to assess phototoxic potential of chemicals. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology and the Life Sciences, Vol. 10, In Vitro Skin Toxicology: Irritation, Phototoxicity, Sensitization (ed. RougierA., GoldbergA.M., & MaibachH.), pp. 213–221. New York, USA: Mary Ann Liebert.
3.
EdwardsS.M., DonnellyT.A., SayraR.M., & RheinsL.A. (1994). Quantitative in vitro assessment of phototoxicity using a human skin model, Skin2™. Photodermatology Photoimmunology and Photomedicine10, 111–117.
4.
AugustinC., CollombelC., & DamourO. (1997). Use of dermal equivalent and skin equivalent models for identifying phototoxic compounds. Photodermatology Photoimmunology and Photomedicine13, 27–36.
5.
LovellW.W., & SandersD.J. (1990). Screening test for phototoxins using solutions of simple bio-chemicals. Toxicology in Vitro4, 318–320.
6.
KhanG., & FleischakerB. (1971). Red blood cell hemolysis by photosensitizing compound. Journal of Investigative Dermatology56, 85–90.
PapeW.J.W., BrandtM., & PfannenbeckerU. (1994). Combined in vitro assay for photohaemolysis and haemoglobin oxidation as part of a phototoxicity test system assessed with various phototoxic substances. Toxicology in Vitro8, 755–757.
9.
FreemanR.G., MurtishawW., & KnoxJ.M. (1970). Tissue culture techniques in the study of cell photobiology and phototoxicity. Journal of Investigative Dermatology54, 164–169.
10.
LockS.O., & FriendJ.V. (1986). Phototoxicity testing in vitro: evaluation of mammalian cell culture techniques. Food and Chemical Toxicology24, 789–793.
11.
LasarowR.M., IsseroffR.R., & GomezE. (1992). Quantitative in vitro assessment of phototoxicity by a fibroblast–neutral red assay. Journal of Investigative Dermatology98, 725–729.
12.
MaierK., Schmitt-LandgrafR., & SiegemundB. (1991). Development of an in vitro test system with human skin cells for evaluation of phototoxicity. Toxicology in Vitro5, 457–461.
13.
SpielmannH., BallsM., BrandM., DöringB., HolzhütterH-G., KalweitS., KlecakG., L'E-plattenierH., LiebschM., LovellW.W., MaurerT., MoldenhauerF., MooreL., PapeW.J.W., PfannenbeckerU., PotthastJ., de SilvaO., SteilingW., & WillshawA. (1994). EEC/COLIPA project on in vitro phototoxicity testing: first results obtained with Balb/3T3 cell phototoxicity assay. Toxicology in Vitro8, 793–796.
14.
SpielmannH., BallsM., DupuisJ., PapeW.J.W., PechovitchG., de SilvaO., HolzhütterH-G., ClothierR., DesolleP., GerberickF., LiebschM., LovellW.W., MaurerT., PfannenbeckerU., PotthastJ.M., CsatoM., SladowskiD., SteilingW., & BrantomP. (1998). The international EU/COLIPA in vitro phototoxicity validation study: results of phase II (blind trial). Part 1: the 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test. Toxicology in Vitro12, 305–327.
15.
SpielmannH., BallsM., DupuisJ., PapeW.J.W., de SilvaO., HolzhütterH-G., GerberickF., LiebschM., LovellW.W., & PfannenbeckerU. (1988). A study on UV filter chemicals from Annex VII of European Union Directive 76/768/EEC, in the in vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test. ATLA26, 679–708.
MoysanA., MirandaM.A., MorlièreP., Peno-MazzarinoL., AverbeckD., AverbeckS., Clement-LacroixP., MichelL., BazinM., GezeM., SantusR., JeanmouginM., CastellJ.V., & DubertretL. (1994). Evaluation of phototoxicity: from in vitro to in vivo. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology and the Life Sciences, Vol. 10, In Vitro Skin Toxicology: Irritation, Phototoxicity, Sensitization (ed. RougierA., GoldbergA.M., & MaibachH.), pp. 185–194. New York, USA: Mary Ann Liebert.
18.
MorikawaF., NakamuraY., FukudaM., HamanoM., YokoyamaY., NaguraT., IshiharaM., & TodaK. (1974). Techniques for evaluation of phototoxicity and photoallergy in laboratory animals and man. In Sunlight and Man (ed. PathakM.A., HarberL.C., SeijiM., & KukitaA.), pp. 529–557. Tokyo, Japan: University of Tokyo Press.
19.
SugiyamaM., ItagakiH., HayashiT., MurakamiN., & KatoS. (1994). In vitro assay to predict phototoxicity of chemicals. I. Red blood cell hemolysis assay. AATEX2, 183–191.
20.
TraynorN.J., JohnsonB.E., & GibbsN.K. (1996). Photohaemolysis assay for drugs phototoxicity complicated by ‘bleaching’ of released haemoglobin. Toxicology in Vitro10, 619–624.
21.
BallsM., BlaauboerB., BrusickD., FrazierJ., LambD., PembertonM., ReinhardtC., RoberfroidM., RosenkranzH., SchmidB., SpielmannH., StammatiA., & WalumE. (1990). Report and recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedures. ATLA18, 313–337.
22.
WinterbournC.C. (1985). Free-radical production and oxidative reaction of hemoglobin. Environmental Health Perspectives64, 321–330.
23.
KaidbeyK.H., & KligmanA.M. (1980). Photomaximization test for identifying photoallergic contact sensitizers. Contact Dermatitis6, 161–169.
24.
KochG., MagnussonB., NobreusN., NyquestG., & SöderholmG. (1973). Contact allergy to medicaments and materials used in dentistry. Odontologisk Revy24, 109–114.
25.
KligmanA.M. (1966). The identification of contact allergens by human assay. Journal of Investigative Dermatology47, 369–374.
26.
CroninE. (1984). Photosensitivity to musk ambrette. Contact Dermatitis11, 88–92.
BarrattM.D., & BrownK.R. (1985). Photochemical binding of photoallergens to human serum albumin: a simple in vitro method for screening potential photoallergens. Toxicology Letters24, 1–6.
29.
PendlingtonR.U., & BarrattM.D. (1990). Molecular basis of photocontact allergy. International Journal of Cosmetic Science12, 91–103.
30.
LovellW.W. (1993). A scheme for in vitro screening of substances for photoallergenic potential. Toxicology in Vitro7, 95–102.
31.
LaskinJ.D. (1994). Cellular and molecular mechanisms in photochemical sensitization: studies on the mechanism of action of psoralens. Food and Chemical Toxicology32, 119–127.
