Learning Mathematics in the Israeli Junior High School: The Gender Issue and beyond it Women and Mathematics Learning: A Feminist or an Economic Question? 1
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2005
Learning Mathematics in the Israeli Junior High School: The Gender Issue and beyond it Women and Mathematics Learning: A Feminist or an Economic Question? 1
One of the main reasons for social and economic gender inequity in our society is closely connected to the unsatisfactory level of math and science that girls choose to learn while in high school Not learning enough mathematics, physics, chemistry, and computer science limits the access of many girls to high prestige professions, whether mathematics-related, e.g. engineering, economics, or management, or not necessarily math-related, e.g. law or psychology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltermanR. (2000). Women and men at the Technion: Faculty members and students. Data analysis 2000 and policies for increasing equal opportunities. Haifa, Israel: The Technion, Israel Institute of Technology.
AyalonH. (1994). Monopolizing knowledge? The ethnic composition and curriculum of Israeli high schools. Sociology of Education, 67(4), 264–278.
4.
AyalonH. (1995). Math as a gatekeeper: Ethnic and gender inequity in course taking of the sciences in Israel. American Journal of Education, 104(1), 34–56.
5.
AyalonH. (2000). Course taking of mathematics and the sciences among Arab students in Israel: A case of unexpected gender equity. In ShlanskyS. (Ed.), Sexuality and gender in education (pp. 63–83). Tel Aviv University: School of Education and Ramot Publishing House.
6.
BaramA. (15.8.2002). An unexpected exam. Ha'ir [=The city], 39–42(in Hebrew).
7.
BarroR. (2001). Human capital: Growth, history, and policy. A Session to honor Stanley Engerman. The American Economic Review, 91(2), 12–17.
8.
BenbowC.P. (1988). Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability in Intellectually Talented Preadolescents: Their Nature, Effects, and Possible Causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences11, 169–232.
9.
BenbowC.P.LubinskiD. (1993). Psychological profiles of the mathematically talented: Some sex differences and evidence supporting their biological basis. In The origins and development of high ability. Ciba Foundation Symposium 178 (pp. 44–66), Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
BenbowC.P.LubinskiD.HydeJ. (1997). Mathematics: Is biology the cause of gender differences in performance? In WalshM.R. (Ed.), Women, men, and gender: Ongoing debates (pp. 271–287). New Haven: Yale UP.
11.
BenbowC.P.LubinskiD.SheaD.LEftekhari-SanjaniH. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability at age 13: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science, 11(6), 474–480.
12.
BenbowC.P.StanelyJ.C. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact?Science210, 1262–1264.
13.
BenbowC.P.StanelyJ.C. (1981). Mathematical ability: Is sex a factor?Science212, 491.
14.
BenbowC.P.StanelyJ.C. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences11, 169–232.
15.
DavidH. (2000). Social, familial, and educational problems of the talented girl. Conference on Girls and Women in Science and Engineering, The Ministry of Science and the Ministry of Education, Tel Aviv University, 1129(in Hebrew).
16.
DavidH. (2001). Gender gaps in Mathematics in Israel: An international comparison. Aleh, The Journal for mathematics Teachers, 27, 55–69(in Hebrew).
17.
DavidH. (2002a). Mathematics gender gaps in the matriculation exams and in the psychometrics in Israel. Aleh, The Journal for mathematics Teachers, 28(in Hebrew).
18.
DavidH. (2002b). A minority within a minority: Mathematics, science, and technology studies among Israeli Arabic female students. In MaxwellL.SlavinK.YoungK. (Eds.), Proceedings of The Gender and Science Conference: Brussels, 8-911 2001 (pp. 248–255). Brussels: The European Commission.
19.
DayanA. (2001). More underprivileged students in the state religious schools. Hed Ha'Chinuch [Echo of Education], 5(4), 13.
20.
EcclesJ.S.JacobsJ.E. (1986). Social forces shape math attitudes and performance. Signs, 11, 367–380.
21.
EshetG. (13.12.2002). A new research: There are no ability gender differences but boys perform substantially better than girls under competitive conditions. Yedi'ot Acharonot, p. 21(in Hebrew).
22.
FennemaE. (1990). Teachers' beliefs and gender differences in mathematics. In FennemaE.LederG.C. (Eds.), Mathematics and gender. New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
FennemaE.LederG.C. (1990) (Eds.), Mathematics and gender. New York: Teachers College Press.
24.
FennemaE. (1995). New directions for equity in mathematics education. Secada Walter G. Publications.
25.
FreemanJ. (2004). Cultural influences on gifted gender achievement. High Ability Studies, 15(1), 7–23.
26.
GroblerA.C.GroblerA.A.EsterhuyseK.G.F. (2001). Some predictors of mathematics achievement among black secondary school learners. South African Journal of Psychology, 31(4), 48–54.
27.
HanushekE.A.KimkoD.D. (2000). School, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1184–1208.
28.
HusenT. (1967). International study of achievement in mathematics. A comparison of twelve countries (2 Vols.). Stockholm and NY: Almquist & Wiksell, and John Willey & Sons.
29.
KeithT.Z.CoolV.A. (1992). Testing models of school learning: Effects of quality of instruction, motivation, academic coursework, and homework on academic achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 7(3), 207–226.
30.
KloostermanP. (1996). Students' beliefs about knowing and learning mathematics: Implications for motivation. In CarrM. (Ed.), Motivation in mathematics (pp. 131–156). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
31.
LederG.C. (1995). Equity inside the mathematics classroom: Fact or artifact? In SecadaW.G.FennemaE.AdajianL.B. (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 209–224). Cambridge University Press.
32.
LeeV.E.SmithJ.B.CroningerR.G. (1997). How high school organization influences the equitable distribution of learning in mathematics and science. Sociology of Education, 70, 128–150.
33.
MaX. (1997). Reciprocal relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 221–229.
34.
MevarechZ. (2000). Gender gaps in scholastic achievements. In ZormanR.DavidH.There is another way: Girls and Women — Achievements and challenges (pp. 9–13). Jerusalem: The Henrietta Szold Institute and The Ministry of Education(in Hebrew).
35.
MullisI.V.S.MartinM.O.GonzalesE.J.GregoryK.D.GardenR.A.O'ConnorK.M.ChrostowskiS.J.SmithT.A. (122000). TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA's Repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth Grade. Chesnut Hill, MA: The International Study Center, Boston College, and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
36.
MullisI.V.S.MartinM.O.FierrosE.G.GoldbergA.L.StemlerS.E. (72000). Gender differences in achievement: IEA Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chesnut Hill, MA: The International Study Center, Boston College, and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
37.
PatekinD. (1999). Where has the “Jewish genius” disappeared?The Kibbutzim College Annual, 21, 267–276(in Hebrew).
38.
PerlM. (27.12.2002). David Klein — A worried citizen. Maariv, pp. 4–5, 30 (in Hebrew).
39.
RadushinskiL. (2002). Silence, Fighting! Chess, The Israeli Chess Association Journal, 42(2), 38–39(in Hebrew).
40.
SchoenfeldA.H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
41.
SchommerM. (1990). The effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.
42.
ShacharIlil (26.11.2001). Large gaps in education level between poor and well-off settlings. Maariv, p. 17(in Hebrew).
43.
ShacharIlilSabanI. (9.5.2001). Research: Educational gap between Ashkenazim and Orientals increases. Maariv, p. 21(in Hebrew).
44.
StatisticsIsrael (1997). Yearbook of Statistics, Jerusalem, Israel: The Central Bureau of Statistics(in Hebrew).
45.
StatisticsIsrael (1998). Yearbook of Statistics, Jerusalem, Israel: The Central Bureau of Statistics(in Hebrew).
46.
StatisticsIsrael (1999). Yearbook of Statistics, Jerusalem, Israel: The Central Bureau of Statistics(in Hebrew).
47.
StatisticsIsrael (2000). Yearbook of Statistics, Jerusalem, Israel: The Central Bureau of Statistics(in Hebrew).
48.
StatisticsIsrael (2001). Pupils who took matriculation and final exams and are entitled to certificate 1995/6. Jerusalem, Israel: The Central Bureau of Statistics(in Hebrew).
49.
StatisticsIsrael (2002a). Yearbook of Statistics, Jerusalem, Israel: The Central Bureau of Statistics(in Hebrew).
50.
StatisticsIsrael (2002b). Twelfth grade pupils matriculation examinees and entitled to a certificate by locality of residence, 1998. Jerusalem, Israel: The Central Bureau of Statistics(in Hebrew).
51.
SteinbackM.GwizdalaJ. (1995). Gender differences in mathematics attitudes of secondary students. School Science and Mathematics, 95(1), 36–41.
52.
TraubmanT. (2.2.2002). Female scientists are discriminated in Israel more than in Europe. Haaretz, 1(in Hebrew).
53.
VollmerF. (1986). The relationship between expectancy and academic achievement — How can it be explained?British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 64–74.
54.
WolkinsonB.W. (2000). Arab employment in Israel: The quest for equal employment opportunity. Contributions in Labor Studies, 53. Westport and London: Greenwood Press. www.cbs.gov.il/shnaton53www.ynet.co.il,26.1.2003.
55.
YerushalmiM. (1997). To be like Japanese? A reaction. Aleh, The Journal for Mathematics Teachers, 21, 376–373(in Hebrew).
56.
ZelikovichM. (16.1.2003). 9% dropout. Ha'ir [=The city], p. 32(in Hebrew).
57.
ZormanR.DavidH. (2000). There is another way: Girls and women — Achievements and challenges. Jerusalem: The Henrietta Szold Institute and The Ministry of Education(in Hebrew).
