Korean Gifted Girls: The Achieved and the Unachieved

Abstract

To identify the factors which facilitate or hinder personal career advancement of Korean gifted females, 162 graduates from the most prestigious girls' high school in Korea were studied using qualitative methods and in particular, documents such as alumnae records, questionnaires and interviews. Half of the gifted females had been included in a publication entitled ‘Korean Eminent Women’ and the other half were full-time housewives. The two groups were compared on their perceptions of their family background, school experiences, career development, career choices, life and marriage satisfaction, and attribution of their success and failure as professional women. Results indicated that gifted girls whose aspirations for career development were supported by their families and who were determined to advance in their careers achieved in their professional lives. The results imply that in Korean society, which remains a “patriarchal democracy” only those gifted females who were strong enough in their own convictions to discount the pressures of stereotypical attitudes limiting women's role in society to that of mothers and housewives, could achieve in their careers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnold

K. D.

(1993). Undergraduate aspirations and career outcomes of academically talented women: A discriminant analysis. Roeper Review, 15 (3), 169–175.

Eccles

J. S.

(1985). Why doesn't Jane run? Sex differences in educational and occupational patterns. In Horowitz

F. D.

O'Brien

(Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 251–295). Hyatsville, MD: American Psychological Association.

Fox

L.H.

(1985). Sex differences: Implications for program planning for the academically gifted. In Stanley

J.C.

George

W.C.

Solano

C.H.

(Eds.), The gifted and the creative: A fifty year perspective (pp. 113–138). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Gilligan

(1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Higham

S. J.

Navarre

(1984). Gifted adolescent females require differential treatment. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 8 (1), 43–58.

Heilbrun

C.G.

(1988). Writing a woman's life. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

Kass-Simon

Farnes

(1990). Women of science: Righting the record. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Kerr

B.A.

(1991). Smart girls, gifted women. Ohio: Ohio Psychology Press.

Lincoln

Y.S.

Guba

E.S.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

10.

Noble

K. D.

(1987). The dilemma of the gifted woman. Psychology of women quarterly, 11, 367–378.

11.

Noble

K.D.

(1989). Counselling gifted women: Becoming the heroes of our own stories. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12 (2), 131–141.

12.

Osding

R. N.

(1992). Is school unfair to girls? Time, February 24, p.49.

13.

Patton

M.Q.

(1987). Quantitative education methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

14.

Peter

C.C.

(1994). Gifted females: Teachers, nurses and astronauts; A unit on gender issues; PEAC: Primary extension and challenge. Gifted Education International, 9 (3), 138–143.

15.

Reis

S. M.

(1987). We can't change what we don't recognize: Understanding the special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31 (2), 83–88.

16.

Reis

S.M.

Callahan

C.M.

(1989). Gifted females: They've come a long way-or have they? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12 (2), 99–117.

17.

Reis

S.M.

Callahan

C.M.

(1994). Attitudes of adolescent gifted girls and boys toward education, achievement, and the future. Gifted Education International, 9 (3), 144–151.

18.

Reis

S. M.

(1996). Older women's reflection on eminence: obstacles and opportunities, Roeper Review, 18 (1), 66–72.

19.

Rodenstein

Pfleger

Colangelo

(1977). Career development of gifted women. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21, 340–347.

20.

Soh (1991). The chosen women in Korean politics: An anthropological study. New York: Praeger.

21.

Yewchuk

Chatterton

(1990). Career development of eminent Canadian women, In Bailey

Braggett

Robinson

(Eds.), The challenge of excellence: “A vision splendid” (pp. 414–421). Sydney: Australian Association for the Education of the Gifted and Talented.

22.

Yewchuk

Chatterton

Jackson

(1990). Survey of eminent Canadian women: Demographic data. In Ellis

J. L.

Willinsky

J.M.

(Eds.), Girls, women, and giftedness (pp. 112–122). Toronto, ON: Trillium Press.

23.

Yewchuk

Cho

S. H.

Ahn

D. H.

(1995). Career development of eminent Korean women. Paper presented at the 11th World Conference on the Gifted and Talented, Hong Kong, August.