During the past 20 years, there has been a burgeoning literature on racial discourse in Western liberal democracies that has been informed by several disciplines. This literature has analysed linguistic and discursive patterns of everyday talk and formal institutional talk that can be found in parliamentary debates, political speeches, and the media. One of the most pervasive features of contemporary race discourse is the denial of prejudice. Increasing social taboos against openly expressing racist sentiments has led to the development of discursive strategies that present negative views of out-groups as reasonable and justified while at the same time protecting the speaker from charges of racism and prejudice. This research has demonstrated the flexible and ambivalent nature of contemporary race discourse. The present article reviews these discursive patterns or ways of talking about the other and emphasises the significant contribution that this work has made to research on language and discrimination.
Abel, S. (1996). “Wild Maori” and “Tame Maori” in television news. New Zealand Journal of MediaStudies, 3, 33-38.
2.
Augoustinos, M., Le Couteur, A., & Soyland, J. (2002). Self-sufficient arguments in political rhetoric: Constructing reconciliation and apologising to the stolen generations. Discourse & Society, 13, 105-142.
3.
Augoustinos, M., & Quinn, C. (2003). Social categorization and evaluation: Illegal immigrants or asylum seekers and refugees? New Review ofSocial Psychology, 2, 29-37.
4.
Augoustinos, M., Tuffin, K., & Every, D. (2005). New racism, meritocracy and individualism: Constraining affirmative action in education. Discourse & Society, 16, 315-339.
5.
Augoustinos, M., Tuffin, K., & Rapley, M. (1999). Genocide or a failure to gel? Racism, history and nationalism in Australian talk. Discourse and Society , 10, 351-378.
6.
Barker, M. (1981). The new racism. London: Junction Books.
7.
Bhagwati, P.N. (2002). Human rights and immigration detention in Australia: Report of the Mission to Australia 24 May to 2 June 2002. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
8.
Billig, M. (1988). The notion of “prejudice”: Some rhetorical and ideological aspects. Text, 8, 91-110.
9.
Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions. London : Sage.
10.
Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Sage.
11.
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.
12.
Blommaert, J., & Verschueren, J. (1993). The rhetoric of tolerance or, what police officers are taught about migrants. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 14, 49-63.
13.
Blommaert, J., & Verschueren, J. (1998). Debating diversity: Analysing the discourse of tolerance. London: Routledge.
14.
Condor, S., Figgou, L., Abell, J., Gibson, S., & Stevenson, C. (2006). “They're not racist”: Prejudice mitigation and suppression in dialogue. British Journal of Social Psychology , 45, 441-462.
15.
Corlett, D. (2002). Asylum seekers and the new racism. Dissent, 8, 46-47, 59.
16.
Edwards, D. (2003). Analyzing racial discourse: The discursive psychology of mind-world relationships. In H. van den Berg, H. Houtcoup-Steenstra, & M. Wetherell (Eds.), Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary approaches to the interview (pp. 31-48). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London : Sage.
18.
Gallup, G., & Hugick, L. (1990, June). Racial tolerance grows, progress on racial equality less evident. Gallup Poll Monthly, 23-32.
19.
Gilroy, P. (1993). Small acts: Thoughts on the politics of Black cultures. London: Serpents Tail .
20.
Hage, G. (1998). White nation: Fantasies of White supremacy in a multicultural society. Sydney, Australia: Pluto.
21.
Howard, J. (2001). Address at the Federal Liberal Party campaign launch. Retrieved July 3, 2006, from http://www.pm.gov.au/news/speeches/2001/speech1311.htm
22.
Jones, L. (2000). Immigration and parliamentary discourse in Great Britain: An analysis of the debates related to the 1996 Asylum and Immigration Act. In R. Wodak & T. A. van Dijk (Eds.), Racism at the top: Parliamentary discourses on ethnic issues in six European states (pp. 283-310). Austria: Drava Verlag.
23.
Kinder, D.R., & Sears, D.O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 414-431.
24.
Kinder, D.R., & Sears, D.O. (1985). Public opinion and political action. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 3rd ed., pp.659-741). New York: Random House.
25.
Le Couteur, A., & Augoustinos, M. (2001). Apologising to the stolen generations: Argument, rhetoric, and identity in public reasoning. Australian Psychologist, 36, 51-61.
26.
Le Couteur, A., Rapley, M., & Augoustinos, M. (2001). “This very difficult debate about Wik”: Stake, voice and the management of category memberships in race politics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 35-57.
27.
Lynn, N., & Lea, S. (2003). “A phantom menace and the new Apartheid”: The social construction of asylum-seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse and Society, 14, 425-452.
28.
Marr, D., & Wilkinson, M. (2003). Dark victory. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
29.
McConahay, J.B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 92-125). New York: Academic Press.
30.
McCreanor, T. (1993a). Mimiwhangata: Media reliance on Pakeha commonsense in interpretations of Maori actions. Sites, 26, 79-90.
31.
McCreanor, T. (1993b). Pakeha ideology of Maori performance: A discourse analytic approach to the construction of educational failure in Aoteoroa/New Zealand. Folia Lingistica, 27, 293-314.
32.
McCreanor, T. (1993c). Settling grievances to deny sovereignty. Sites, 27, 45-73.
33.
Mehan, H. (1997). The discourse of the illegal immigration debate: A case study in the politics of representation. Discourse & Society, 8, 249-270.
34.
Nairn, R.G., & McCreanor, T.N. (1990). Insensitivity and hypersensitivity: An imbalance in Pakeha accounts of racial conflict. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, 293-308.
35.
Nairn, R.G., & McCreanor, T.N. (1991). Race talk and common sense: Patterns in Pakeha discourse on Maori/Pakeha relations in New Zealand. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 10, 245-261.
36.
O'Doherty, K. (2001). “Asylum seekers,” “boat people,” and “illegal immigrants”: Social categorisation and fact construction in the media. Unpublished honours thesis, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
37.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
Rapley, M. (1998). “Just an ordinary Australian”: Self-categorisation and the discursive construction of facticity in “new racist” political rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 325-344.
39.
Rapley, M. (2001). How to do X without doing Y: Accomplishing discrimination without “being racist”— “doing equity.” In M. Augoustinos & K. Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding prejudice, racism and social conflict (pp. 231-250). London: Sage.
40.
Reeves, F. (1983). British racial discourse: A study of British political discourse about race and race-related matters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Rojo, L.M. (2000). Spain, outer wall of the European fortress: Analysis of the parliamentary debates on the immigration policy in Spain. In R. Wodak & T. A. van Dijk (Eds.), Racism at the top: Parliamentary discourse on ethnic issues in six European parliaments (pp. 169-220). Austria: Drava Verlag.
42.
Santa Ana, O. (1999). “Like an animal I was treated”: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse & Society, 10, 191-224.
43.
Sedlak, M. (2000). You really do make an unrespectable foreigner policy.... Discourse on ethnic issues in Austrian parliament. In R. Wodak & T. A. van Dijk (Eds.), Racism at the top: Parliamentary discourse on ethnic issues in six European parliaments (pp. 107-167). Austria: Drava Verlag.
44.
Seidel, G. (1988). Verbal strategies of the collaborators: A discursive analysis of the July 1986 European parliamentary debate on South African sanctions . Text, 8, 111-125.
45.
Sniderman, P.M., & Tetlock, P.E. (1986). Symbolic racism: Problems of motive attribution in political analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 129-150.
46.
Thiesmeyer, L. (1995). The discourse of official violence: Anti-Japanese North American discourse and the American internment camps. Discourse & Society, 6, 319-352.
47.
van den Berg, H., Houtcoup-Steenstra, H., & Wetherell, M. (Eds.). (2003). Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary approaches to the interview. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
48.
van der Valk, I. (2000). Parliamentary discourse on immigration and nationality in France. In R. Wodak & T. A. van Dijk (Eds.), Racism at the top: Parliamentary discourse on ethnic issues in six European parliaments (pp. 221-260). Austria: Drava Verlag.
49.
van Dijk, T.A. (1984). Prejudice in discourse. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
50.
van Dijk, T.A. (1987). Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
51.
van Dijk, T.A. (1991). Racism and the press. London : Routledge.
52.
van Dijk, T.A. (1992). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society, 3, 87-118.
53.
van Dijk, T.A. (1993). Elite discourses and racism. London: Sage.
54.
van Dijk, T.A. (1997). Political discourse and racism: Describing others in Western parliaments. In S. H. Riggins (Ed.), The language and politics of exclusion: Others in discourse (pp. 31-64). London: Sage.
55.
van Dijk, T.A. (2000). Parliamentary debates. In R. Wodak & T. A. van Dijk (Eds.), Racism at the top: Parliamentary discourses on ethnic issues in six European states (pp. 45-78). Austria: Drava Verlag.
56.
Verkuyten, M. (1998). Personhood and accounting for racism in conversation . Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 28, 147-168.
57.
Verkuyten, M. (2001). “Abnormalisation” of ethnic minorities in conversation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 257-258.
58.
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9, 387-412.
59.
Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism & Psychology , 9, 335-356.
60.
Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
61.
Wetherell, M., Stiven, H., & Potter, J. (1987). Unequal egalitarianism: A preliminary study of discourses concerning gender and employment opportunities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 59-71.
62.
Wodak, R., & van Dijk , T. A. (Eds.). (2000 ). Racism at the top: Parliamentary discourses on ethnic issues in six European states. Austria: DravaVerlag.
