This study tests the extent of speakers’ linguistic accommodation to members of putative in-groups and out-groups in a border locality where such categorizations can be said to be particularly accentuated. Variation in the speech of informants in dialect contact interactions with separate interviewers is analyzed for evidence of speech accommodation in the form of phonological convergence or divergence. The data do not support a straightforward interpretation of accommodation, and findings are considered in terms of evidence required for such an account. Implications for the notion of salience in explanations of contact-induced language change are also considered, as is the significance of the “interviewer effect” in the compilation of data sets for use in quantitative studies of phonological variation and change.
Aitken, A.J. ( 1962). Vowel length in modern Scots (manuscript). Scotland, UKUniversity of Edinburgh, Scotland .
2.
Auer, P., & Hinskens, F. ( 2005). The role of interpersonal accommodation in a theory of language change. In P. Auer, F. Hinskens, & P. Kerswill (Eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages (pp. 335-357). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Beal, J.C. ( 2000). From Geordie Ridley to Viz: Popular literature in Tyneside English. Language and Literature, 9, 343-359.
4.
Beal, J.C. ( 2008). English dialects in the North of England: Phonology. In B. Kortmann & C. Upton (Eds.), Varieties of English: Vol. 1. The British Isles (pp. 122-144). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
5.
Bell, A. ( 1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145-204.
6.
Chen, M. ( 1970). Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of consonant environment. Phonetica, 22, 129-159.
7.
Coupland, N. ( 1984). Accommodation at work: Some phonological data and their implications. International Journal of the Sociology of Language , 46, 49-70.
8.
Coupland, N., & Giles, H. (Eds.). (1988). Communicative accommodation: Recent developments. Language and Communication, 8, 175-327.
9.
Gallois, C., & Giles, H. ( 1998). Accommodating mutual influence in intergroup encounters . In M. T. Palmer & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), Mutual influence in interpersonal communication: Theory and research in cognition, affect, and behavior (pp. 135-162). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
10.
Gallois, C., Ogay, T., & Giles, H. ( 2005). Communication accommodation theory: A look back and a look ahead. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about communication and culture (pp. 121-148). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Giles, H. (Ed.). (1984). The dynamics of speech accommodation [Special issue]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 1-155.
12.
Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. ( 1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context and consequence . In H. Giles, N. Coupland, & J. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1-68). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Giles, H., Mulac, A., Bradac, J.J., & Johnson, P. ( 1987). Speech accommodation theory: The first decade and beyond . In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 13-48). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Giles, H., & Ogay, T. ( 2006). Communication accommodation theory. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 293-310). London: Routledge .
15.
Glauser, B. ( 1988). Aitken’s context in Northumberland, Cumberland and Durham: A computer-assisted analysis of material from the Survey of English Dialects (SED). In A. R. Thomas (Ed.), Methods in dialectology: Proceedings of the 6th international conference held at the University College of North Wales, August 1987 (pp. 611-624). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
16.
Hughes, A., Trudgill, P., & Watt, D. ( 2005). English accents and dialects: An introduction to social and regional varieties of English in the British Isles. London: Hodder Arnold.
17.
Kerswill, P., & Williams, A. ( 2002). "Salience" as an explanatory factor in language change: Evidence from dialect levelling in urban England. In M. C. Jones & E. Esch (Eds.), Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors (pp. 81-110). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
18.
Kiely, R., McCrone, D., Stewart, R., & Bechhofer, F. ( 2000). Debatable land: National and local identity in a border town. Sociological Research Online, 5(2). Retrieved June 24, 2009, from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/2/kiely.html
19.
Krause, C.B. ( 1997, April). Vowel duration in Lowick/Northumberland: A sociophonetic approach to dialectology. Paper presented at the 1st UK Language Variation Workshop, Reading, UK.
20.
Labov, W. ( 1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
21.
Labov, W. ( 1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In J. Baugh (Ed.), Language in use (pp. 28-53). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
Labov, W., Ash, S., & Boberg, C. ( 2006). The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
23.
Lehiste, I. ( 1996). Suprasegmental features of speech. In N. J. Lass (Ed.), Principles of experimental phonetics (pp. 226-244). St. Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby.
24.
Llamas, C. (in press). Convergence and divergence across a national border. In C. Llamas & D. Watt (Eds.), Language and identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
25.
Llamas, C., Johnson, D.E., & Watt, D. ( 2008, April). Rhoticity in four Scottish/English border localities . Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 17, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
26.
Maguire, W. ( 2005). The "NURSE-NORTH Merger" in Tyneside English: Origin, status and "reversal." Paper presented at University of Aberdeen Centre for Linguistic Research seminar series. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from http://www.abdn.ac.uk/langling/resources/Maguire.ppt
27.
Mendoza-Denton, N. ( 2002). Language and identity. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), Handbook of language variation and change (pp. 475-499). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
28.
Meyerhoff, M. ( 1998). Accommodating your data: The use and abuse of accommodation theory in sociolinguistics. Language and Communication, 18, 205-225.
29.
Milroy, J. ( 1995). Investigating the Scottish vowel length rule in a Northumbrian dialect. Newcastle and Durham Working Papers in Linguistics , 4, 187-196.
30.
Milroy, L., & Gordon, M. ( 2003). Sociolinguistics: Method and interpretation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
31.
Niedzielski, N., & Giles, H. ( 1996). Linguistic accommodation. In H. Goebl, P. H. Nelde, Z. Stary, & W. Wölck (Eds.), Kontaktlinguistik: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung [An International Handbook of Contemporary Research] (Vol. 1, pp. 332-342). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
32.
Påhlsson, C. ( 1972). The Northumbrian burr: A sociolinguistic study. Lund, Sweden: Gleerup.
33.
Pukli, M. ( 2004). Scottish English and the Scottish vowel length rule: An empirical study of Ayrshire speakers. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from http://w3.pac.univ-tlse2.fr/pdf/Pukli0709.pdf
34.
Purnell, T. (In press). Accommodation and contact in Milwaukee: Evidence from select African American and white vowel space features. Journal of Language and Social Psychology.
35.
Scobbie, J., Hewlett, N., & Turk, A. ( 1999). Standard English in Edinburgh and Glasgow: The Scottish vowel length rule revealed. In P. Foulkes & G. J. Docherty (Eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles (pp. 230-245). London: Arnold.
36.
Scobbie, J., Turk, A., & Hewlett, N. ( 1999, August). Morphemes, phonetics and lexical items: The case of the Scottish vowel length rule. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, August (pp. 1617-1620). Regents of the University of California.
37.
Stuart-Smith, J. ( 2008). Scottish English: Phonology. In B. Kortmann & C. Upton (Eds.), Varieties of English: Vol. I. The British Isles (pp. 48-70). Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
38.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. ( 1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-53). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
39.
Thakerar, J.N., Giles, H., & Cheshire, J. ( 1982). Psychological and linguistic parameters of speech accommodation theory. In C. Fraser & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Advances in the social psychology of language (pp. 205-255). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Trudgill, P. ( 1986). Dialects in contact. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
41.
Turner, J.C. ( 1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers , R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6-34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
42.
Turner, J.C., & Brown, R. ( 1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives, and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 201-234). London: Academic Press.
43.
Watson, B., & Gallois, C. ( 2004). Emotional expression as a sociolinguistic strategy: Its importance in medical interactions. In S.-H. Ng, C.-Y. Chiu, & C. Candlin (Eds.), Language matters: Communication, culture, and identity (pp. 63-83). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
44.
Watt, D. ( 2006, July). Rhoticity and competing national identities in Berwick upon Tweed, Northumberland. Poster presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 16, University of Limerick, Republic of Ireland.
45.
Watt, D., & Ingham, C. ( 2000). Durational evidence for the Scottish vowel length rule in Berwick English. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 8, 205-228.
46.
Watt, D., & Milroy, L. ( 1999). Patterns of variation and change in three Newcastle vowels: Is this dialect levelling? In P. Foulkes & G. J. Docherty (Eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles (pp. 25-46). London: Arnold.
47.
Watt, D., & Pichler, H. ( 2003, September). The Scottish vowel length rule in Berwick English revisited. Poster presented at UK Language Variation and Change Conference 4, University of Sheffield , South Yorkshire, UK.
48.
Wells, J.C. ( 1982). Accents of English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
