Using the framework of Communication Accommodation Theory, this study investigated the extent to which job applicants objectively and subjectively altered their accents to converge to or diverge from the speech style of the interviewer. Forty-eight male and 48 female job applicants participated in two interviews for a casual research assistant position. In one interview, the interviewer had a broad Australian English accent, and in the other one, the interviewer had a cultivated accent. Applicants showed broader accents with broad-accented interviewers than with cultivated-accented interviewers. Applicants did not converge to the cultivated-accented interviewers, however, and male job applicants were more likely than were females to diverge from the cultivated-accented interviewers. There were also discrepancies between objectively rated changes to applicants' accents and their subjective judgments about the extent of accent accommodation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ball, P., Gallois, C., & Callan, V. J. (1989). Language attitudes: Aperspective from social psychology. In P. Collins & D. Blair (Eds.), Australian English: The language of a new society (pp. 1-14). St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
2.
Ball, P., Giles, H., Byrne, J., & Berechree, P. (1984). Situational constraints on the evaluative significance of speech: Some Australian data. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 115-129.
3.
Beebe, L., & Giles, H. (1984). Speech accommodation theories: A discussion in terms of second language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 5-32.
4.
Bernard, J. (1989). Quantitative aspects of the sounds of Australian English. In P. Collins & D. Blair (Eds.), Australian English: The language of a new society (pp. 186-203). St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
5.
Bilous, F. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1988). Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same-and mixed-sex dyads. Language and Communication, 8, 183-194.
6.
Bourhis, R. (1983). Language attitudes and self-reports of French-English usage in Quebec. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 4, 163-179.
7.
Bourhis, R., & Giles, H. (1977). The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In H. Giles (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 119-135). London: Academic Press.
8.
Burgoon, J., Olney, C., & Coker, R. (1987). The effects of communicator characteristics on patterns of reciprocity and compensation. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 11, 146-165.
9.
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
10.
Campion, M. A., Pursell, E. D., & Brown, B. X. (1988). Structured interviewing. Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 45, 313-340.
11.
Cargile, A., Giles, H., & Cl6ment, R. (1995). The role of language in ethnic conflict. In J. Gittler (Ed.), Racial and ethnic conflict: Perspectives from the social disciplines (pp. 189-208). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
12.
Clyne, M. (1985). Multilingual Australia (2nd ed.). Melbourne: River Seine.
13.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.
14.
Gallois, C., & Callan, V. J. (1985). Situational influences on perceptions of accented speech. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Language and social situations (159-173). New York: Springer.
15.
Gallois, C., & Callan, V. J. (1988). Communication accommodation and the prototypical speaker: Predicting evaluations of solidarity and status. Language and Communication, 8, 274-283.
16.
Gallois, C., & Pittam, J. (in press). Communication attitudes and accommodation in Australia: A culturally diverse English-dominant context. International Journal of Psycholinguistics.
17.
Gallois, C., Callan, V. J., & McKenzie-Palmer, J.-A. (1992). The influence of applicant communication style and interviewer characteristics on hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1040-1059.
18.
Gallois, C., Franklyn-Stokes, A., Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1988). Communication accommodation theory and intercultural encounters: Intergroup and interpersonal considerations. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 157-185). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Gallois, C., Giles, H., Jones, E., Cargile, A., & Ota, H. (1995). Communication Accommodation Theory: Elaborations and extensions. In R. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 115-147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Genesee, F., & Bourhis, R. (1982). The social psychological significance of code-switching in cross-cultural communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1, 1-28.
21.
Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15, 87-105.
22.
Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In H. Giles, N. Coupland, & J. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1-68). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1991). Language: Contexts and consequences. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
24.
Giles, H., & Johnson, P. (1981). The role of language in ethnic group relations. In J. C. Turner & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 199-243). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
25.
Giles, H., & Johnson, P. (1987). Ethnolinguistic identity theory: A social psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 68, 69-99.
26.
Giles, H., Mulac, A., Bradac, J., & Johnson, P. (1987). Speech accommodation theory: The first decade and beyond. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 13-48). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
Giles, H., & Smith, P. (1979). Accommodation theory: Optimal levels of convergence. In H. Giles & R. M. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 45-65). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
28.
Herriot, P. (1981). Tbwards an attributional theory of the selection interview. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 54, 165-173.
29.
Hogg, M. (1985). Masculine and feminine speech in dyads and groups: A study of speech style and gender salience. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 99-112.
30.
Holmes, J. (1990). Hedges and boosters in women's and men's speech. Language and Communication, 9, 185-205.
31.
Horvath, B. (1985). Variation inAustralian English: The sociolects ofSydney. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Jones, E., Gallois, C., Barker, M., & Callan., V. J. (1994). Evaluations of interactions between students and academic staff: Influence of communication accommodation, ethnic group, and status. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 158-191.
33.
Jones, E., Gallois, C., Callan, V. J., & Barker, M. (1995). Language and power in an academic context: The effects of status, ethnicity, and sex. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 434-461.
34.
Mitchell, A., & Delbridge, A. (1965). The pronunciation of English in Australia. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.
35.
Noller, P. (1993). Gender and emotional communication in marriage: Different cultures or differential social power?Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 132-152.
36.
Ramsay, S., Gallois, C., & Callan, V. J. (in press). Social rules and attributions in the personnel selection interview. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology.
37.
Tannen, D. (1986). That's not what I meant!New York: Ballantine.
38.
Thackerar, J., Giles, H., & Cheshire, J. (1982). Psychological and linguistic parameters of speech accommodation theory. In C. Fraser & K R. Scherer (Eds.), Advances in the social psychology of language (pp. 205-255). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in contact. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
40.
Williams, J. (1984). Gender and intergroup behaviour: Ibwards an integration. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 311-316.
