International institutions are being transformed by the twinned appearance of new non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and new technologies. How do these processes co-evolve? If we were limited to three words to describe the new interactive technologies of the Web, we would highlight the following logics: link, search, interact. Whereas in other systems these logics are additive, on the Web they can be recombinatory. Search, for example, can be conducted based on the structure of links, leading to new patterns of interaction, new links and new methods of search. Of greatest interest are the kinds of search where you don’t know what you’re looking for but will recognize it when you find it. In short, innovation is promoted by networked organizational forms. New technologies do not determine these innovative outcomes, but they can facilitate them. The article explores the prospect of shifts among NGOs from autarky to collaboration, and from information transmission to knowledge networks in the virtual public sphere.
Anheier, H. and N. Themudo (2002) ‘Organizational Forms of Global Civil Society’, pp. 191-216 in Marlies Glasius , Mary Kaldor and Helmut Anheier (eds) Global Civil Society 2002. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
2.
Appadurai, A. (2000) ‘Grassroots Globalization and the Research Imagination’ , Public Culture12(1): 1-19 .
3.
Austin, J. (2000) The Collaboration Challenge. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
4.
Bach, J. and D. Stark (2002) ‘Innovative Ambiguities: NGOs’ Use of Interactive Technology in Eastern Europe’ , Studies in International and Comparative Development37(2): 3-23 .
5.
Bendell, J. (2000) Terms for Endearment: Business, NGOs and Sustainable Development. Sheffield: Greenleaf .
6.
Burt, R. (1992) Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
7.
Callon, M. (1998) The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell .
8.
Castells, M. (1999) The Network Society. London: Blackwell .
9.
Contractor, N. (2000) Social Network Formulations of Knowledge and Distributed Intelligence: Using Computational Models to Extend and Integrate Theories of Transactive Memory and Public Goods. Heterarchies: Distributed Intelligence and the Organization of Diversity Project . Santa Fe, New Mexico: Santa Fe Institute .
10.
Contractor, N. , D. Zinket al. (1998) ‘IKNOW: A Tool to Assist and Study the Creation, Maintenance, and Dissolution of Knowledge Networks’, pp. 210-217 in T. Ishida (ed.) Community Computing and Support Systems: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1519. Berlin: Springer Verlag .
11.
Cruikshank, B. (1999) The Will to Empower. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press .
12.
Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari (1987) A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
13.
Edwards, M. and D. Hulme (eds) (1996a) Too Close for Comfort: NGOs, States and Donors. London: Earthscan Press .
14.
Edwards, M. and D. Hulme (1996b) Beyond the Magic Bullet: NGO Performance and Accountability in the Post-Cold War World. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press .
15.
Falk, R. (1999) Predatory Globalization. Oxford: Polity Press .
16.
Fox, J.A. and L.D. Brown (1998) The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs, and Grassroots Movements. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
17.
Girard, M. and D. Stark (2002) ‘Distributing Intelligence and Organizing Diversity in New Media Projects’ , Environment and Planning A34(11): 1927-1950 .
18.
Gladwell, M. (1999) ‘The Science of the Sleeper’ , The New Yorker4 October: 48 .
19.
Greider, W. (2000) ‘Global Agenda: After the WTO Protest in Seattle, It’s Time to Go on the Offensive. Here’s How’ , The Nation270(4): 11 .
20.
Hardt, M. and A. Negri (2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
21.
Hutchins, E. (1995) Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
22.
Johnson, S. (1997) Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate. San Francisco, CA: HarperCollins .
23.
Jordan, K. , J. Hauseret al. (2003) ‘The Augmented Social Network: Building Identity and Trust into the Next-generation Internet’, The Link Tank, online www.asn.planetwork.net/whitepaper.html.
24.
Latour, B. (1986) ‘Powers of Association’, pp. 264-280 in J. Law (ed.) Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Routledge .
25.
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press .
26.
Latour, B. (1991) ‘Society is Technology Made Durable’, pp. 103-131 in J. Law (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination. New York: Routledge .
27.
Law, J. and J. Hassard (eds) (1999) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Black-well .
28.
Levy, P. (1997) Collective Intelligence. New York: Plenum Trade .
29.
Lewis, E. (2001) ‘Red Alert’, The Guardian ( London ).
30.
Lindenberg, M. and C. Bryant (2001) Going Global. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press .
31.
O’Mahony, S. and S.R. Barley (1999) ‘Do Digital Telecommunications Affect Work and Organization?’ , Research in Organizational Behavior21: 125-161 .
32.
Peizer, J. (2000) ‘Sustainable Development in the Digital Age’ , Media Channel, available online www.mediachannel.org/views/oped/peizer.shtml.
33.
Rosenau, J. (1998) ‘Governance and Diplomacy in a Globalizing World’, in D. Archibugi , D. Held and M. Köhler (eds) Re-imagining Political Community. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
34.
Ruggie, J. (1993) ‘Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations’ , International Organization47(1): 139-174 .
35.
Sabel, C. (1992) ‘Studied Trust: Building New Forms of Cooperation in a Volatile Economy’, in F. Pyke and W. Sengenberger (eds) Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration. Geneva: International Labor Organization .
36.
Sagawa, S. and E. Segal (2000) Common Interest, Common Good: Creating Value Through Business and Social Sector Partnerships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press .
37.
Sanyal, B. (1994) Cooperative Autonomy: The Dialectic of State-NGO Relationships in Developing Countries. Geneva: International Labor Organization .
38.
Sassen, S. (1998) Globalization and its Discontents: Essays on the New Mobility of People and Money. New York: New Press .
39.
Sassen, S. (1999) Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press .
40.
Stark, D. (2001) ‘Ambiguous Assets for Uncertain Environments: Heterarchy in Postsocialist Firms’, pp. 69-104 in P. DiMaggio (ed.) The Twenty-first-century Firm: Changing Economic Organization in International Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
41.
Stark, D. and L. Bruszt (1998) Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
42.
Stewart, P.J. and A. Strathern (eds) (2001) Anthropology and Consultancy. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press .
43.
Strange, S. (1996) The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
44.
Suchman, L. (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-machine Communication. New York: Cambridge University Press .
45.
Toulmin, S. (1990) Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
46.
Union of International Associations (1999) Yearbook of International Organizations 1909/1999. http://www.uia.org/statistics/organizations/ytb299.php.
47.
Viner, K. (2000) ‘ “Luddites” We Should Not Ignore: Instead of Vilifying the Prague Protesters, We Could Learn from Them’ , The Guardian ( London ) 29 September.
48.
Warkentin, C. (2001) Reshaping World Politics: NGOs, the Internet and Global Civil Society. New York: Rowman and Littlefield .
49.
West, P. (2001) ‘Environmental NGOs and the Nature of Ethnographic Inquiry’ , Social Analysis45(2): 55-77 .
50.
Wittenburg, K. , D. Das , W. Hill and L. Stead (1998) ‘Group Asynchronous Browsing on the World Wide Web’, http://www.w3.org/Conferences/WWW4/Papers/98/.
51.
World Bank (2001) ‘Nongovernmental Organizations and Civil Society/Overview’, http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/essd/essd.nsf/NGOs/home, accessed 8 June 2001.
52.
World Resources Institute (2003) ‘Environmental Governance and Institutions’, http://earthtrends.wri.org/text/GOV/variables/575notes.htm.
