In The Open (2002), a series of reflections on the historical endeavours to define the essential features of the human figure in relation to the biological existence it shares with animals, Giorgio Agamben offers a detailed reading of Titian’s painting The Nymph and the Shepherd. He argues that the scene depicted enables the contemporary viewer to visualize the advent of radical freedom, the moment when the historical dialectic of nature and culture comes to a ‘stand-still’. In this article, I offer a different reading of The Nymph and the Shepherd, whereby the advent of radical freedom and death become indistinguishable. This different reading, I argue, calls into question Agamben’s understanding of corporeal being. I conclude by suggesting more speculatively and tentatively that ‘bioart’, the field now emerging at the intersection of the creative arts and the bio-medical sciences, may provide a better site of reflection on the questions Agamben ultimately poses about the future of bio-political governmentality.
Adorno, T. ( 2005) Minima Moralia: Reflections on a Damaged Life. London: Verso.
2.
Agamben, G. ( 1993) Stanzas: Word and Phantasm in Western Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
3.
Agamben, G. ( 1995) The Idea of Prose. Albany: State University of New York Press.
4.
Agamben, G. ( 1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
5.
Agamben, G. ( 1999) Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
Agamben, G. ( 2000) Means without End: Notes on Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
7.
Agamben, G. ( 2002) The Open: Man and Animal. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
Agamben, G. ( 2005) The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
Aristotle (1992) The Politics . London: Penguin.
10.
Auerbach, A. ( 2007) ‘Imagine No Metaphors: The Dialectical Image of Walter
11.
Benjamin’, Image [&] Narrative 18, URL (consulted June 2008): http://www.imageandnarrative.be/thinking_pictures/auerbach.htm
12.
Bal, M. ( 1994) ‘Dead Flesh, or the Smell of Painting’ , in N. Bryson, A.M. Holly and K. Moxey (eds) Visual Culture: Images and Interpretations. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
13.
Bartoloni, P. ( 2004) ‘The Stanza of the Self: On Agamben’s Potentiality’ , Contretemps5: 8-15.
14.
Benjamin, W. ( 1992) ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’ , in H. Arendt (ed.) Illuminations . London: Fontana .
15.
Berenson, B. ( 1980) The Italian Painters of the Renaissance. Oxford: Phaidon.
16.
Bradley, A. and P. Fletcher (eds) (2009) The Politics to Come: Power, Secularity and the Messianic. London: Continuum.
17.
Butler, J. ( 1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’ . London: Routledge .
18.
Butler, J. ( 1997) The Psychic Life of Power: Essays in Subjection . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
Butler, J. ( 1999) ‘Revisiting Bodies and Pleasures’, in V. Bell (ed.) Performativity and Belonging. London: Routledge .
20.
Butler, J. ( 2004) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence . London: Verso.
21.
Canguilhem, G. ( 1991) The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books. Connolly, W. (1988) Political Theory and Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
22.
Deleuze, G. ( 1988) Foucault. London: Athlone Press.
23.
Dillon, M. and L. Lobo-Guerrero ( 2009) ‘The Biopolitical Imaginary of Species Being’ , Theory, Culture & Society26(1): 1-23.
24.
Dundas, J. ( 1985) ‘A Titian Enigma’, Artibus et Historiae6(12): 39-55.
25.
Epstein, S. ( 1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge . Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
Ferretti, S. ( 1984) Il demone della memoria: simbolo e tempo storico in Warburg, Cassirer, Panofsky. Casale Monferrato: Marietti.
27.
Foucault, M. ( 1973) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences . New York: Vintage Press .
28.
Foucault, M. ( 1990) The History of Sexuality. London : Penguin.
29.
Foucault, M. ( 2004) ‘Society Must Be Defended’: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-1976. London: Penguin.
30.
Hanssen, B. ( 1999) ‘Portrait of Melancholy (Benjamin, Warburg, Panofsky)’ , MLN (Modern Language Notes)114(5): 991-1013.
31.
Hauser, J. ( 2003) ‘Gènes, génies, gênes’ , in J. Hauser (ed.) L’Art biotech: le lieu unique. Nantes: Filigranes Editions.
32.
Hauser, J. ( 2004) ‘Designer Bodies: Towards the Posthuman Condition’ , URL (consulted June 2008): http://www.a-r-c.org.uk/db/Hauser.html
33.
Hauser, J. ( 2005) ‘Bio Art: Taxonomy of an Etymological Monster’ , Ars Electronica, URL (consulted June 2008): http://www.aec.at/en/archives/festival_archive/festival_catalogs/festival_artikel.asp?iProjectID=13286
34.
Keating, P. and A. Cambrosio ( 2003) Biomedical Platforms: Realigning the Normal and the Pathological in Late Twentieth century Medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
Lock, M. ( 2002) Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death . Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
Miller, F. ( 1995) Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
37.
Panofsky, E. ( 1969) Problems in Titian, Mostly Iconographic. New York: New York University Press.
38.
Panofsky, E. ( 1972) Studies in Iconology: Humanistic Themes in the Art of the Renaissance. New York: Harper and Row.
39.
Panofsky, E. ( 1991) Perspective as Symbolic Form. New York : Zone Books.
40.
Rabinow, P. ( 1996) Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
41.
Rabinow, P. ( 1999) French DNA: Trouble in Purgatory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Rabinow, P. ( 2003) Anthropos Today: Reflections on Modern Equipment . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
Rose, N. ( 2007) The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-first Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
44.
Shearman, J. ( 1992) Only Connect: Art and the Spectator in the Italian Renaissance . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
Smith, J. ( 2004) ‘"I Am Sure that You Are More Pessimistic than I Am . . ." : An Interview with Giorgio Agamben’, Rethinking Marxism16: 115-24.
46.
Summers, D. ( 1986) ‘Intentions in the History of Art’ , New Literary History17(2): 305-21.
47.
Summers, D. ( 1989) ‘"Form", Nineteenth-century Metaphysics, and the Problem of Art Historical Description’, Critical Inquiry15: 372-406.
48.
Žižek, S. ( 1999) The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology . London: Verso.
