This pragmatic study addresses the question of the plural realities that emerge from perception, based on an empirical analysis of the tasting activity of wine amateurs and olfactory experts. Though they share the same requirement of rooting taste in the product under scrutiny, they also significantly differ regarding the constraints with which their tasting results have to comply: repeatability for experts’ tasting results, and activity contiunuation for amateurs. Both therefore foster the emergence of two contrasting realities: a stabilized one for experts; an ‘un-stabilized’ one for amateurs. Both happen to fit with the ‘fiction’ and the ‘reference’ modes of existence of Latour’s inventory, which extends and relaunches the analysis of the coexistence of activities initiated by the works on ‘boundary objects’ some decades ago. Finally, the notion of taste is reinterpreted as a translation operator between tasting realities.
AllardLaurence (1999) L’amateur: une figure de la modernité esthétique. Communications. 68(1): 9–31. DOI: 10.3406/comm.1999.2028.
2.
ArmstrongDavid M. (1961) Perception and the Physical World. New York, NY: Routledge & Keagan Paul.
3.
ArmstrongDavid M. (1973) Belief, Truth and Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Archive.
4.
Bar-YoshafatYonatan (2013) Expert and amateur: Yet another look. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music44(1): 19–47.
5.
BarthesRoland (1975) Roland Barthes par Roland Barthes. Paris: Seuil.
6.
BergMergAkrichMadeleine (2004) Introduction: Bodies on trial: Performances and politics in medicine and biology. Body & Society10(2–3): 1–12.
7.
BergerPeter L.LuckmannThomas (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor Press/Double Day.
8.
BessyChristianChateauraynaudFrancis (1993) Les ressorts de l’expertise. Epreuves d’authenticité et engagement des corps. Raisons Pratiques4: 141–164.
9.
BourdieuPierre (1980) Le Sens Pratique. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
10.
CabanacMichel (1971) Physiological role of pleasure. Science173(4002): 1103–1107.
11.
ChisholmRoderick M. (1957) Perceiving: A Philosophical Study. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12.
CholletSylvieValentinDominique (2000) Le degré d’expertise a-t-il une influence sur la perception olfactive? Quelques éléments de réponse dans le domaine du vin. L’Année psychologique100(1): 11–36.
13.
CholletSylvieValentinDominique (2001) Impact of training on beer flavor perception and description: Are trained and untrained subjects really different?Journal of Sensory Studies16(6): 601–18.
14.
CoopmansCatelijneVertesiJanetLynchMichael E., et al. (2014) Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
D’AlessandroStevenPecotichAnthony (2013) Evaluation of wine by expert and novice consumers in the presence of variations in quality, brand and country of origin cues. Food Quality and Preference28(1): 287–303.
16.
DespretVinciane (2004) The body we care for: Figures of anthropo-zoo-genesis. Body & Society10(2–3): 111–134.
17.
DretskeFred I. (1969) Seeing and Knowing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
DugleJ. (1997) Note on ‘Experts versus consumers: A comparison’. Journal of Sensory Studies12: 147–154.
19.
FosterJohn (2000) The Nature of Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
FribourgGilbertSarfatiClaude (1989) La dégustation: connaître et comprendre le vin. Suze la Rousse: EDISUD.
21.
FujimuraJoan H. (1992) Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and ‘translation’. In: PickeringAndrew (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 168–211.
22.
GawelRichard (1998) The use of language by trained and untrained experienced wine tasters. Journal of Sensory Studies12(4): 267–284.
23.
GélardMarie-Luce (2016) L’anthropologie sensorielle en France. Un champ en devenir?L’Homme217(1): 91–107.
24.
GibsonJames J. (1986 [1979]) The Ecologial Approach to Visual Perception. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25.
GoodwinCharles (1994) Professional vision. American Anthoplogist96(3): 606–633.
26.
GoodwinCharles (2000) Practices of seeing, visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In: van LeeuwenTheoJewittCarey (eds) Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage, pp. 157–182.
27.
HennionAntoine (2001) Music lovers: Taste as performance. Theory, Culture & Society18(5): 1–22.
28.
HennionAntoineTeilGenevieve (2004) Le goût du vin. Pour une sociologie de l’attention. In: Nahoum-GrappeVéroniqueVincentOdile (eds) Esthétiques du quotidien. Paris: Editions de la MSH, pp. 111–126.
29.
HopferHeleneHeymannHildegarde (2014) Judging wine quality: Do we need experts, consumers or trained panelists?Food Quality and Preference32: 221–233.
30.
HoughG. (1998) Experts versus consumers : A critique. Journal of Sensory Studies13: 285–290.
31.
HumeDavid (1957 [1765]) On the Standard of Taste and Other Essays. Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.
32.
IngoldTim (2000) The Perception of the Environment. London: Routledge.
33.
IsenbergArnold (1949) Critical communication. The Philosophical Review58(4): 330–344.
34.
JamesWilliam (1892) Psychology: Briefer Course. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
35.
JamesWilliam (1895) Is life worth living?The International Journal of Ethics6(1): 1–24.
36.
JamesWilliam (1996 [1912]) Essays in Radical Empiricism. New York, NY: University of Nebraska Press & Longmans Greens and Co.
37.
LatourBruno (1986) Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together. In: KuklickHenrika (ed.) Knowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press, pp. 1–40.
38.
LatourBruno (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Keynes/Cambridge, MA: Open University Press/Harvard University Press.
39.
LatourBruno (2003) The promises of constructivism. In: HarawayDonnaPickeringAndrewLatourBruno (eds) Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 27–46.
40.
LatourBruno (2004) How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & Society10(2–3): 205–229.
41.
LatourBruno (2013) An Inquiry Into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
LawlessHarry T. (1984) Flavour description of white wine by ‘experts’ and non-expert wine consumers. Journal of Food Science49: 120–123.
43.
LehrerAdrienne (1975) Talking about wine. Language51(4): 901–923.
44.
LehrerAdrienne (2009) Wine and Conversation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45.
LelièvreMaudCholletSylvieAbdiHervé, et al. (2008) What is the validity of the sorting task for describing beers? A study using trained and untrained assessors. Food Quality and Preference19(8): 697–703.
46.
LynchMichael (1988) The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences. Human Studies11(2/3): 201–234.
47.
MeadGeorge HerbertMorrisCharles W. (1972 [1938]) Works of George Herbert Mead, Vol. 2: Philosophy of the Present. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, p. 251.
48.
Merleau-PontyMaurice (1964) Le visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard.
49.
Merleau-PontyMaurice (2012 [1945]) Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
50.
MoskowitzH. R. (1996) Experts versus consumers: A comparison. Journal of Sensory Studies11: 19–37.
51.
MountHarry (2006) The monkey with the magnifying glass: Constructions of the connoisseur in eighteenth-century Britain. Oxford Art Journal29(2): 167–184.
52.
NobleAnn C.ArnoldR.A.MasudaB.M., et al. (1984) Progress towards a standardized system of wine aroma terminology. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture35(2): 107–109.
53.
PeacockeChristopher (2001) Does perception have a nonconceptual content?The Journal of Philosophy98(5): 239–264.
54.
PeynaudÉmileBlouinJacques (1996) Le goût du vin, le grand livre de la dégustation. Paris: Dunod.
55.
PhillipsChristopher J. (2016) The taste machine: Sense, subjectivity, and statistics in the California wine world. Social Studies of Science46(3): 461–481.
56.
PinkSarah (2011) Multimodality, multisensoriality and ethnographic knowing: Social semiotics and the phenomenology of perception. Qualitative Research11(3): 261–276.
PomianKrzysztof (2003) Des saintes reliques à l’art moderne. Paris: Gallimard.
59.
Pritchett ManganPatricia A. (1992) Performance assessment of sensory panelists. Journal of Sensory Studies7(3): 229–252.
60.
RigauxJacky (2012) La dégustation géo-sensorielle. Clémencey (France): Terre en Vues.
61.
RodriguesHeberBallesterJordiSaenz-NavajasMaria Pilar, et al. (2015) Structural approach of social representation: Application to the concept of wine minerality in experts and consumers. Food Quality and Preference46: 166–172.
62.
SantosTiagoLemmerichFlorianStrohmaierMarkus, et al. (2019) What’s in a review: Discrepancies between expert and amateur reviews of video games on metacritic. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction3 (CSCW): Article 140.
63.
SauvageotFrançoisUrdapilletaIsabelPeyronDominique (2006) Within and between variations of texts elicited from nine wine experts. Food Quality and Preference17(6): 429–444.
64.
SchieferJanFischerChristian (2008) The gap between wine expert ratings and consumer preferences: Measures, determinants and marketing implications. International Journal of Wine Business Research20(4): 335–351.
65.
ShapinSteven (2012) The tastes of wine: Towards a cultural history. Rivista di estetica51(3): 49–94.
66.
ShapinSteven (2016) A taste of science: Making the subjective objective in the California wine world. Social Studies of Science46(3): 436–460.
67.
SmithA.D. (2001) Perception and belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research62(2): 283–309.
68.
SolomonGreggEricArn (1990) Psychology of novice and expert wine talk. The American Journal of Psychology103(4): 495–517.
69.
SouriauÉtienne (1956) Du mode d’existence de l’œuvre à faire. Bulletin de la société Française de philosophie4(44): 4–58.
70.
StarSusan LeighGriesemerJames R. (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and ‘boundary objects’: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science19: 387–420.
71.
TeilGeneviève (1994) Décrire le goût de fromages: des consommateurs aux experts: Vol. 1: Le jugement de dégustation ‘amateur’; Vol. 2: Jugements d’amateurs et descriptions d’experts; Vol. 3: Les réseaux de mots associés; Vol. 4: Les résultats des analyses factorielles. Paris: Editions INRA ESR.
72.
TeilGeneviève (1997) Dire le goût: Expression experte et naïve à propos du goût des fromages. Revue Française de Marketing156: 65–78.
73.
TeilGeneviève (1998) Devenir expert aromaticien : Y a-t-il une place pour le goût dans les goûts alimentaires?Revue de Sociologie du Travail40(4): 503–522.
74.
TeilGeneviève (2004) De la coupe aux lèvres: pratiques de la perception et mise en marché de vins de qualité. Toulouse: Octarès.
75.
TeilGeneviève (2019) Learning to smell: On the shifting modalities of experience. The Senses and Society14(3): 330–345.
76.
TeilGeneviève (2021) Amateurs’ exploration of wine: A pragmatic study of taste. Theory, Culture & Society38(5): 137–157.
77.
TeilGenevièveHennionAntoine (2004) Discovering quality or performing taste? A sociology of the amateur. In: HarveyMarkMcMeekinmAndrewWardeAlan (eds) Qualities of Food: Alternative Theoretical and Empirical Approaches. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 19–37.
78.
ThévenotLhévenot (1994) Le régime de familiarité. Des choses en personne. Genèses17: 72–101.
79.
TrompettePascaleVinckDominique (2009) Retour sur la notion d’objet-frontière. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances3(1): 5–27.
80.
TrompettePascaleVinckDominique (2010) Retour sur la notion d’objet-frontière (2): Fécondité de la notion dans l’analyse écologique des objets innovants. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances4(1): 11–15.
81.
VerlaineJulie (2010) Parole d’amateur contre parole d’expert? Artistes, critiques et écrivains à la Galerie René Drouin (1939–1962). In: VaugeoisDominiqueRiallandIvanne (eds) L’écrivain et le spécialiste. Paris: Garnier, pp. 99–115.
82.
WeilRoman L. (2007) Debunking critics’ wine words: Can amateurs distinguish the smell of asphalt from the taste of cherries?Journal of Wine Economics2(2): 136–144.
83.
WoltersC.J.AllchurchE.M. (1994) Effect of training procedure on the performance of descriptive panels. Food Quality and Preference5(3): 203–214.
