In this paper, I qualitatively examine the rise and possible fall of statutory district plans as a major tool of regional planning in Israel. Rigid statutory regional plans are a top-down means, and the Israeli case demonstrates that their days are not necessarily over in an era of ‘soft spaces’ and complex governance networks. The swing of the pendulum in attitudes toward these plans is not associated with centralization–decentralization trends. Rather, it reflects power relations between two centralized coalitions of stakeholders. The one led by elected politicians favors proactive-developmental goals, aiming at state-led open-ended or non-statutory planning. The other coalition, led by central state bureaucrats, favors strict regulation. NGOs, assumed to form the core of soft horizontal governance networks, paradoxically support top-down ‘hard’ modes of regional planning, in the name of environmental sustainability that is not necessarily best served by bottom-up soft approaches.
AlbrechtsLHealeyPKunzmannK (2003) “Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe”. Journal of the American Planning Association69: 113–129
2.
AlexanderLT (2011) “The promise and perils of ‘new regionalist’ approaches to sustainable communities”. Fordham Urban Law Journal38: 629–674
3.
AlfasiNAlmagorJBenensonI (2012) “The actual impact of comprehensive land-use plans: insights from high resolution observations”. Land Use Policy29: 862–877
4.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG (2009) “Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: the new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway”. Environment and Planning A41: 617–633
5.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG (2010) “Spatial planning, devolution and new planning spaces”. Environment and Planning C28: 803–818
6.
AltermanR (2001) “National-level planning in Israel: walking on the tightrope between government control and privatization”. In: AltermanR (eds) National-Level Planning in Democratic Countries, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, pp. 257–288
7.
AltermanR (2002) Planning in the face of Crisis, London: Routledge
8.
AltermanR (2010) “Israel”. In: AltermanR (eds) Takings International, Chicago: American Bar Association, pp. 313–341
9.
AndersenHT (2008) “The emerging Danish government reform – centralised decentralization”. Urban Research & Practice1: 3–17
10.
AndrewCDoloreuxD (2012) “Economic development, social inclusion and urban governance: the case of the city region of Ottawa in Canada”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research36: 1288–1305
11.
Bar-Cohen A, 2007, The Legislation Process of the Planning and Building Law – 1965: Planning Institutions and Plans PhD thesis, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan (Hebrew)
12.
BerentsenWH (1985) “Regional planning in Central Europe: Austria, the Federal Republic of Germany, the German Democratic Republic, and Switzerland”. Environment and Planning C3: 319–339
13.
Bimkom (2008) The Prohibited Zone, Israeli Planning Policy in the Palestinian Villages in Area C, Jerusalem: Bimkom – Planners for Planning Rights
14.
BrutzkusE (1964) Physical Planning in Israel, Problems and Achievements, Jerusalem: Ministry of Interior
15.
ChapinTS (2012) “From growth controls, to comprehensive planning, to smart growth: planning's emerging fourth wave”. Journal of the American Planning Association78: 5–15
16.
ClarkeJJ (1936) “Restriction of Ribbon Development Act, 1935”. Town Planning Review17: 11–32
17.
CohenATurelYKaplanM (2009) NOP 35, Monitoring and Update, Jerusalem: Planning Administration, Ministry of Interior(Hebrew)
18.
DashJEfratE (1964) The Israel Physical Master Plan, Jerusalem: Ministry of Interior, Planning Department
19.
DavoudiS (2012) “The legacy of positivism and the emergence of interpretive tradition in spatial planning”. Regional Studies46: 429–441
20.
DietrichsB (1989) “Regional planning”. Environment and Planning C7: 395–402
21.
El-EiniRIM (2006) Mandated Landscape, British Imperial Rule in Palestine, London: Routledge
22.
FaludiA (2010) “European spatial planning: past, present and future”. Town Planning Review81: 1–22
23.
FeitelsonE (2012) “Physical planning in Israel: inbetween government, society, capital and environment”. In: HassonS (eds) The Production of Space in Israel: The Map of Settlements and Land, Jerusalem: Land Use Research Institute and Keter, pp. 87–108. (Hebrew)
24.
FelsensteinD (2012) “District planning – an international perspective”. In: Ben-AmiG. (eds) An Evaluation of District Plans in Israel, Final Report, Jerusalem: The Hebrew University, Institute of Urban and Regional Studies(Hebrew)
25.
FrenkelA (2004) “The potential effect of national growth-management policy on urban sprawl and the depletion of open spaces and farmland”. Land Use Policy21: 357–369
26.
GallandD (2012) “Is regional planning dead or just coping? The transformation of a state sociospatial project into growth-oriented strategies”. Environment and Planning C30: 536–552
27.
HallPTewdwr-JonesM (2011) Urban and Regional Planning, 5th. London: Routledge
28.
HaughtonGAllmendingerPOosterlynckS (2013) “Spaces of neoliberal experimentalism: soft spaces, postpolitics, and neoliberal governmentality”. Environment and Planning A45: 217–234
29.
JacobsAJ (2004) “Federations of municipalities: a practical alternative to local government consolidations in Japan?”. Governance17: 247–274
30.
KhamaisiR (1997) “Israeli use of the British Mandate planning legacy as a tool for the control of Palestinians in the West Bank”. Planning Perspectives12: 321–340
31.
KlijnEH (2008) “Governance and governance networks in Europe”. Public Management Review10: 505–525
32.
LapidotA (1977) The Regional Schemes of the Mandate Period – A Window to Statutory Physical Planning in Palestine, Jerusalem: Department of Geography, The Hebrew University(Hebrew)
33.
MagenNAltermanR (1986) District Outline Plans in Israel: Objectives, Implementation and Evaluation, Technion, Haifa: Center for Urban and Regional Studies(Hebrew)
34.
MarkusenA (1999) “Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies”. Regional Studies33: 869–884
35.
MetzgerJSchmittP (2012) “When soft spaces harden: the EU strategy for the Baltic Sea region”. Environment and Planning A44: 263–280
OlesenK (2012) “Soft spaces as vehicles for neoliberal transformations of strategic spatial planning?”. Environment and Planning C30: 910–923
38.
PurcellM (2007) “City-regions, neoliberal globalization and democracy: a research agenda”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research31: 197–206
39.
RazinE (2013) “Deconcentration in the Tel Aviv metropolitan area: governance, markets and the quest for sustainability”. In: VojnovicI (eds) Urban Sustainability, A Global Perspective, East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, pp. 149–175
40.
RazinESmithPJ (2006) Metropolitan Governing: Canadian Cases, Comparative Lessons, Jerusalem: Magnes
41.
Rodríguez-PoseASandallR (2008) “From identity to the economy: analysing the evolution of the decentralisation discourse”. Environment and Planning C26: 54–72
42.
SanctonA (2008) The Limits of Boundaries, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press
43.
SavitchHVVogelRK (2000) “Paths to new regionalism”. State and Local Government Review32: 158–168
44.
ShacharA (1971) “Israel's development towns: an evaluation of national urbanization policy”. Journal of the American Institute of Planners37: 362–372
45.
ShacharA (1998) “Reshaping the map of Israel: a new national planning doctrine”. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science555: 209–218
46.
SharkanskyI (1997) “Israel: a metropolitan-nation-state”. Cities14: 363–369
47.
SharonA (1951) Physical Planning in Israel, Tel Aviv: Government Printer(Hebrew)
48.
StokerG (1998) “Governance as theory: five propositions”. International Social Science Journal50: 17–28
49.
SwirskiS (2007) Current Plans for Developing the Negev: A Critical Perspective, Tel Aviv: Adva Center
50.
ThomasKLittlewoodS (2010) “From green belts to green infrastructure? The evolution of a new concept in the emerging soft governance of spatial strategies”. Planning Practice & Research25: 203–222
WannopUA (1995) The Regional Imperative: Regional Planning and Governance in Britain, Europe and the United States, London: Routledge
53.
YaroRD (2012) “Metropolitanism: how metropolitan planning has been shaped by and reflected in the plans of the Regional Plan Association”. In: SanyalBValeLJRosanCD (eds) Planning Ideas that Matter, Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 153–178
