Until the mid-2000s, the rise of a “new pattern of strategy formation” in the context of sustainable development (SD) appeared to be a promising shift from mostly ineffective one-off-planning to iterative governance processes. The present paper revisits this once promising governance approach critically. Based on studies, evaluations and peer reviews, it synthesizes how national SD strategies have failed as policy documents and as governance processes in better integrating policies across sectors and levels of government. Based on the conclusion that comprehensive policy integration cannot be achieved through a single multi-sectoral strategy, we argue that it is time to either abandon an approach that has obviously failed to deliver or to recalibrate SD strategies towards the more realistic end of effectively communicating a long-term vision. Although the political relevance of SD strategies has declined in recent years, our findings are relevant to implementing other multi-sectoral strategies and the post-2015 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. While the former replicate already the governance failures analyzed here, the implementation of the latter runs a considerable risk of doing so in the near future.
AdelleCRusselD (2013) “Climate policy integration: a case of Déjà Vu?”. Environmental Policy and Governance23(1): 1–12
2.
BauerA.FeichtingerJSteurerR (2012) “The governance of climate change adaptation in ten OECD countries: challenges and approaches”. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning14/3: 279–304
3.
BauerASteurerR (2015) “National Adaptation Strategies, what else? Comparing adaptation mainstreaming in German and Dutch water management”. Regional Environmental Change15/2: 341–352
4.
BensonM HCraigR K (2014) “The end of sustainability”. Society & Natural Resources27(7): 777–782
5.
Berger G, Sedlacko M, 2009, “Involvement of Sub-National Authorities in National Sustainable Development Strategy Processes” ESDN Quarterly Report March 2009, ESDN, Vienna
6.
BiesbroekRSwartRCarterTCowanCHenrichsTMelaHMorecroftMReyD (2010) “Europe adapts to climate change: comparing National Adaptation Strategies”. Global Environmental Change20(3): 440–450
7.
BinaO (2013) “The green economy and sustainable development: anÿuneasy balance?”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy31(6): 1023–1047
8.
BrouwerSRaynerTHuitemaD (2013) “Mainstreaming climate policy: The case of climate adaptation and the implementation of EU water policy”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy31(1): 134–153
9.
Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft (BMLFUW), 2009a, Österreichische Strategie Nachhaltige Entwicklung (ÖSTRAT)—ein Handlungsrahmen für Länder und Bund (BMLFUW, Vienna)
10.
BMLFUW, 2009b, Arbeitsprogramm 2009–2010 zur Umsetzung der ÖSTRAT. Gemeinsames Arbeitsprogramm des Bundes und der Länder (BMLFUW, Vienna)
11.
BMLFUW, 2011, ÖSTRAT—Österreichische Strategie Nachhaltige Entwicklung: Arbeitsprogramm 2011ff des Bundes und der Länder(BMLFUW, Vienna)
12.
BuchdahlJRaperD (1998) “Environmental ethics and sustainable development”. Sustainable Development6(2): 92–98
13.
BulkeleyHJordanA (2013) “Governing sustainability: Rio+20 and the road beyond.”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy31(6): 958–970
14.
Cabinet Office, 2000, Wiring it up: Whitehall's Management of Cross-Cutting Policies and Services: A Performance and Innovation Unit Report (London)
15.
Carius A, Jacob K, Jänicke M, Hackl W, 2005, Evaluation der Österreichischen Strategie zur Nachhaltigen Entwicklung(BMLFUW: Wien)
16.
Casado-AsensioJSteurerR (2014) “Integrated strategies on sustainable development, climate change mitigation and adaptation in Western Europe: communication rather than coordination”. Journal of Public Policy34/03: 437–473
17.
Casado-AsensioJSteurerR (2015) “Bookkeeping rather than policymaking: national climate change mitigation strategies in Western Europe”. Climate Policy. DOI:10.1080/14693062.2014.980211
18.
ChristensenTLægreidP (2007) “The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform”. Public Administration Review67(6): 1059–1066
19.
CoxR HBélandD (2013) “Valence, policy ideas, and the rise of sustainability”. Governance26(2): 307–328
20.
Dalal-Clayton B, Krikhaar F, (eds.), 2007, A New Sustainable Development Strategy: An Opportunity not to be Missed. Report of a Peer Review of The Netherlands Sustainable Development Strategy, RMNO, Den Haag
21.
Doshi A, Dowell G, et al, 2012, How Firms Respond to Mandatory Information Disclosure, Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt. Unit, Working Paper No. 12-001
22.
EckersleyR (1992) Environmentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach, London: UCL Press
23.
European Environment Agency, 2005a, Environmental Policy Integration in Europe: State of Play and an Evaluation Framework (European Environment Agency, Copenhagen)
24.
European Environment Agency, 2005b, Environmental Policy Integration in Europe: Administrative Culture and Practices, Copenhagen: European Environment Agency
Federal Government of Germany (FGG), 2002, Perspectives for Germany: Our Strategy for Sustainable Development (Federal Government, Berlin)
30.
Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology, Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMWi, BMU), 2010, Energy Concept for an Environmentally Sound, Reliable and Affordable Energy Supply (BMWi and BMU, Berlin)
31.
FergusonP (2014) “The green economy agenda: business as usual or transformational discourse?”. Environmental Politics24(1): 17–37
32.
Finnish Ministry of Environment (Finnish MoE), 2009, National Assessment of Sustainable Development 2009 (MoE, Helsinki)
Government of Lithuania, 2003, National Strategy for Sustainable Development (MoE, Vilnius)
35.
HowlettMRaynerJ (2006a) “Convergence and divergence in new governance arrangements: evidence from Europe integrating national resource strategies”. Journal of Public Policy26(2): 167–189
36.
HowlettMRaynerJ (2006b) “Globalization and governance capacity: explaining divergence in National Forest Programs as Intances of ‘Next-Generation’ Regulation in Canada and Europe”. Governance19(2): 251–275
37.
IIED (2002); IIED, 2002, “Sustainable Development Strategies: A Resource Book. http://www.google.at/url?url-http://www.sd-network.eu/pdf/resources/Dalal-Clayton,%2520Bass%2520(2002)%2520-%2520Sustainable%2520Development%2520Strategies%2520-%2520A%2520Resource%2520Book.pdf&rct-j&q-&esrc-s&sa-U&ved-0CBoQFjACahUKEwjM3-C6k_LIAhXJPhQKHYRoCb8&sig2-LPYT3b6KhfQBKKTFfo_0JA&usg-AFQjCNHzNJpQltuPRss_CRz4ZteZUPy5cQ, accessed 2 November 2015
38.
IUCN, 1980, World Conservation Strategy (IUCN, Gland)
39.
JacobKMünchLBüttnerH (2012) Leitfaden zur Strategieentwicklung im BMU, Berlin: BMU
40.
JacobKKannenH (2013) Nachhaltigkeitsstrategien erfolgreich entwickeln: Untersuchung von Nachhaltigkeitsstrategien auf internationaler Ebene, Berlin: Bertelsmann Stiftung
41.
JänickeMJörgensH (2000) “Strategic environmental planning and uncertainty: a cross-national comparison of green plans in industrialized countries”. Policy Studies Journal28(3):
JordanA (2008) “The governance of sustainable development: taking stock and looking forwards”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26(1): 17–33
44.
Jordan A, Lenschow A (eds.), 2008, Innovation in Environmental Policy? Integrating the Environment for Sustainability (Edward Elgar, London)
45.
JordanALenschowA (2010) “Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review”. Environmental Policy and Governance20(3): 147–158
46.
JordanAWurzelR K WZitoA (2005) “The rise of ‘new’ policy instruments in comparative perspective: has governance eclipsed government?”. Political Studies53/3: 477–496
47.
JordanGHalpinD (2006) “The political costs of policy coherence: constructing a rural policy for Scotland”. Journal of Public Policy26(01): 21–41
48.
KambitesC J (2014) “Sustainable development: the ‘unsustainable’ development of a concept in political discourse”. Sustainable Development22(5): 336–348
49.
KerrA (2007) “Serendipity is not a strategy: the impact of national climate programmes on greenhouse-gas emissions”. Area39(4): 418–430
50.
LaffertyWKnudsenJLarsenO (2007) “Pursuing sustainable development in Norway: the challenge of living up to Brundtland at home”. European Environment17: 177–188
51.
Lenschow A (ed.), 2002, Environmental Policy Integration—Greening Sectoral Policies in Europe (Earthscan, London)
52.
LimBSpanger-SiegfriedE (2004) Adaptation Policy Frameworks for Climate Change: Developing Strategies, Policies and Measures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
53.
LingT (2002) “Delivering joined-up government in the UK: Dimensions, issues and problems”. Public Administration80(4): 615–642
54.
LundqvistL (2004) Realizing Sustainable Development through management by objectives: a comparison of Dutch, Swedish and EU strategies. In: LaffertyW (eds) Governance for Sustainable Development: The Challenge of Adapting Form to Function, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
55.
MayP JJonesBDBeemB ENeff-SharumE A (2005) “Policy coherence and component-driven policymaking: Artic Policy in Canada and the United States”. Policy Studies Journal33(1): 37–63
56.
MeadowcroftJ (1997) “Democracy and the challenge of sustainable development”. International Political Science Review18(2): 167–189
57.
MeadowcroftJ (2009) “What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions”. Policy Sciences42(4): 323–340
58.
Meuleman L, 2008, Public Management and the Metagovernance of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets: The Feasibility of Designing and Managing Governance Style Combinations (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg)
59.
MolA P JSonnenfeldD ASpaargarenG (2009) The Ecological Modernisation Reader: Environmental Reform in Theory and Practice, London: Routledge
60.
MulganG (2009) The Art of Public Strategy: Mobilizing Power and Knowledge for the Common Good, Oxford: Oxford University Press
61.
MurrayF (2013) “The changing winds of atmospheric environment policy.”. Environmental Science & Policy29(0): 115–123
62.
Niestroy I, 2012, Sustainable Development Councils at National and Sub-National Levels Stimulating Informed Debate: Stocktaking. Sdg2012, Stakeholder Forum
63.
Nordbeck R, 2001, Nachhaltigkeitsstrategien als politische Langfriststrategien: Innovationswirkungen und Restriktionen. FFU-Report 01-02, FFU, Berlin
64.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2001, Sustainable Development: Critical Issues (OECD: Paris)
65.
OECD, 2004, Sustainable Development, Draft Final Report to Ministers, Ad Hoc Group on Sustainable Development, SG/SD(2004)4/REV1, OECD, Paris
66.
OECD, 2006, Good Practices in the National Development Strategies of OECD Countries (OECD, Paris)
67.
OECD-DAC, 2001, Strategies for Sustainable Development: Practical Guidance for Development Cooperation (OECD, Paris), http://www.nssd.net/pdf/gsuse.pdf
68.
Pallemaerts M, 2012, The history and background of the EU's sustainable development policies. European Union, Governance and Sustainable Development. V C Bitzer R, Glasbergen P, Niestroy I, Maastricht, Open Universiteit 97–124
69.
PetersG (1998) “Managing horizontal government: the politics of coordination”. Public Administration76: 295–311
70.
PetersB G (2013) “Toward policy coordination: Alternatives to hierarchy”. Policy & Politics41(4): 569–584
71.
Pisano U, Berger G, 2013, The future of the EU SDS—Expectations and Possible Contributions from the ESDN, 9th ESDN Workshop, 21–22 February 2013, Brussels, Belgium. European Sustainable Development Network/ESDN
72.
Quitzow R, 2011, Nachhaltigkeitsstrategien: Form und Funktion. Nachhaltigkeitsstrategien in Politik und Wirtschaft. J Q Knopf, R Hoffmann, E Rotter, M München, Oekom, pp 123-148
73.
RaynerJHowlettM (2009) “Introduction: Understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolution”. Policy and Society28(2): 99–109
74.
RedcliftM (2005) “Sustainable development (1987–2005): an oxymoron comes of age”. Sustainable Development13: 212–227
75.
ReidD (1995) Sustainable Development: An Introductory Guide, London: Earthscan
76.
RossA (2005) “The UK approach to delivering sustainable development in government: a case study in joined-up working”. Journal of Environmental Law17(1): 27–49
77.
RossA (2010) “It´s time to get serious—why legislation is needed to make sustainable development a reality in the UK”. Sustainability2: 1101–1127
RusselD (2007) “The United Kingdom's sustainable development strategies: leading the way or flattering to deceive?”. European Environment17: 189–200
80.
SachsWSachsWolfgang (1993) Global ecology and the shadow of development, in Global Ecology: A New Arena of Political Conflict, London: Zed Books
81.
SneddonCHowarthR (2006) “Sustainable development in a Post-Brundtland world”. Ecological Economics57(2): 253–268
82.
Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment (2007) Spanish Sustainable Development Strategy, Madrid: MAFE
83.
SRU (German Council of Environmental Advisors), 2000, Environmental Report 2000: “Beginning the Next Millenium”—Summary, Metzler-Poeschel, Wiesbaden
84.
SRU, 2004, Environmental Report 2004: “Ensuring Environmental Protection Capacity” Erich Schmidt, Berlin
85.
SRU, 2012, Environmental Report 2012: “Responsibility in a Finite World”, Erich Schmidt, Berlin
86.
SteurerR (2007) “From government strategies to strategic public management: an exploratory outlook on the pursuit of cross-sectoral policy integration”. European Environment17/3: 201–214
87.
SteurerR (2008) “Sustainable development strategies”. In: JordanLenschowA (eds) Innovation in Environmental Policy? Integrating the Environment for Sustainability, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
SteurerR (2010) “The role of governments in Corporate Social responsibility: characterising public policies on CSR in Europe”. Policy Sciences43/1: 49–72
90.
SteurerR (2012) The renewed EU sustainable development strategy (SDS): policies, governance, actors and political relevance. In: BitzerV (eds) European Union, Governance and Sustainability: Textbook, Open Universiteit, pp. 125–147
91.
SteurerR (2013) “Disentangling governance: a synoptic view of regulation by government, business and civil society”. Policy Sciences46/4: 387–410
92.
SteurerRBergerG (2011) “The EU's double-track pursuit of sustainable development in the 2000s: how Lisbon and sustainable development strategies ran past each other”. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology18/2: 99–108
93.
SteurerRClarC (2015) “Is decentralisation always good for climate change mitigation? How federalism has complicated the greening of building policies in Austria”. Policy Sciences48/1: 85–107
94.
SteurerRHametnerM (2013) “Objectives and indicators in sustainable development strategies: similarities and variances across Europe”. Sustainable Development21/4: 224–241
95.
SteurerRMartinuzziA (2005) “Towards a new pattern of strategy formation in the public sector: first experiences with national strategies for sustainable development in Europe”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy23(3): 455–472
96.
StigsonB (2009) Peer Review on Sustainable Development Policies in Germany, Berlin: German Council for Sustainable Development
97.
StumppE M (2013) “New in town? On resilience and “Resilient Cities””. Cities32(0): 164–166
98.
SwansonDPinterLBreghaFVolkeryAJacobK (2004) National Strategies for Sustainable Development: Challenges, Approaches and Innovations in Strategic and Coordinated Action, Winnipeg: IISD and GTZ
99.
TienhaaraK (2013) “Varieties of green capitalism: economy and environment in the wake of the global financial crisis”. Environmental Politics23(2): 187–204
100.
TilsR (2007) “The German sustainable development strategy: facing policy, management and political strategy assessments”. European Environment17: 164–176
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), 2012, A guidebook to the Green Economy. Issue 1: Green Economy, Green Growth, and Low-Carbon Development—History, Definitions and a Guide to Recent Publications, New York
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), 2001, Guidance in preparing a National Sustainable Development Strategy: Managing Sustainable Development in the New Millenium, http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/publications/nsds_guidance.pdf
106.
VolkeryASwansonDJacobKBreghaFPinterL (2006) “Coordination and innovation in 19 National Strategies for Sustainable Development”. World Development34(12): 2047–2063
107.
von RaggambyAKnoblauchDBergerGSedlackoMZwirnerMMartinuzziA (2010) “Partizipation in der Entwicklung, Umsetzung und Evaluierung von nationalen Nachhaltigkeitsstrategien”. In: SteurerRTrattniggR (eds) Nachhaltigkeit regieren: Eine Bilanz zu Governance-Prinzipien und -Praktiken, München: Oekom, pp. 143–168
108.
Wachter (2010) “Politischer Nutzen von Evaluationen und Monitoring am Beispiel der Schweizer Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie”. In: SteurerRTrattniggR (eds) Nachhaltigkeit regieren: Eine Bilanz zu Governance-Prinzipien und -Praktiken, München: Oekom, pp. 193–214
109.
WiggeringHSandhövelA (2000) “Strategische Zielsetzung als neuer Ansatz der Umweltpolitik“. In: JänickeMJörgensH (eds) Umweltplanung im internationalen Vergleich: Strategien der Nachhaltigkeit, Berlin: Springer
110.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our Common Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press
