Cities have become playgrounds for competitive behaviour and rapid economic dynamics. However, in many cities (or urban agglomerations) economic growth is mainly manifested in specific geographic areas, where creative people and innovative entrepreneurs are located. In this paper we offer first the conceptual and operational foundation for analyzing this so-called ‘urban buzz’ and its interlinked primary drivers. We next develop an analytical framework for testing the buzz hypothesis, with a special reference to the importance of social bonds and networks in Amsterdam. In our empirical analysis we use a unique dataset on social network connectivity and spatial concentration in a city, based on location-sharing services through the use of Foursquare data. Our urban buzz model shows clearly that buzz and socioeconomic (cultural) diversity are closely connected phenomena.
Acs Z J, Bosma N, Sternberg R, 2008, “The entrepreneurial advantage of world cities: evidence from global entrepreneurship monitor data”, working paper, SCALES, University of Utrecht
2.
AlesinaABaqirREasterlyW (1999) “Public goods and ethnic division”. Quarterly Journal of Economics111: 1243–1284
3.
AlesinaABaqirRHoxbyC (2004) “Political jurisdictions in heterogenous communities”. Journal of Political Economy112: 384–339
4.
AminAThriftN (1994) Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press
AnselinLLozano-GraciaN (2008) “Errors in variables and spatial effects in hedonic house price models of ambient air quality”. Empirical Economics34: 5–34
7.
AsheimBCoenenLVangJ (2007) “Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy25: 655–670
8.
BakensJNijkampPPootJ (2013) The Economics of Cultural Diversity, Cheltenham, Glos: Edward Elgar(forthcoming)
9.
BarneyJ (1991) “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”. Journal of Management17: 99–120
10.
BatheltHMalmbergAMaskellP (2004) “Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation”. Progress in Human Geography28: 31–56
11.
BoeriTBrückerH (2005) “Why are Europeans so tough on migrants?”. Economic Policy20: 629–703
12.
BoschmaR A (2005) “Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment”. Regional Studies39: 61–74
13.
Cheng Z, Caverlee J, Lee K, Sui D Z, 2011, “Exploring millions of footprints in location sharing services”, in Proceeding of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM, Barcelona)
14.
ChoenniA (1997) Veelsoortig Assortiment, Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis
15.
CookePUrangaM GEtxebarriaG (1998) “Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective”. Environment and Planning A30: 1563–1584
16.
Cranshaw J, Schwartz R, Hong J, Sadeh N, 2012, “The livehoods project: utilizing social media to understand the dynamics of a city”, in Proceedings of the 6th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media: Volume 12 (ICWSM, Barcelona)
17.
CurridEWilliamsS (2010) “The geography of buzz: art, culture and the social milieu in Los Angeles and New York”. Journal of Economic Geography10: 423–451
18.
de Noronha VazM Tvan LeeuwenENijkampP (2013) Towns in a Rural World, Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate
19.
DurantonGPugaD (2001) “Nursery cities: urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products”. American Economic Review91: 1454–1477
20.
EvansG L (2009) “Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy”. Urban Studies46: 1003–1040
GertlerM S (1995) “ ‘Being there’: proximity, organization, and culture in the development adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies. Economic Geography71: 1–26
23.
GibbonsSOvermanH G (2012) “Mostly pointless spatial econometrics?”. Journal of Regional Science52: 172–191
24.
GlaeserEKallalH DSchinkmannJ AShleiferA (1992) “Growth in cities”. Journal of Political Economy100: 1126–1152
JacobsJ (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York: Vintage Books
27.
JacobsJ (1969) The Economy of Cities, New York: Random House
28.
KahanecMZimmermannK (2011) Ethnic Diversity in European Labor Markets, Cheltenham, Glos: Edward Elgar
29.
KloostermanRRathJ (2003) Immigrant Entrepreneurs: Venturing Abroad in the Age of Globalization, Oxford: Berg
30.
KourtitKNijkampP (2011) “Strategic choice analysis by expert panes for migration impact assessment”. International Journal of Business and Globalisation7: 166–194
31.
KourtitKNijkampP (2012) “Strangers on the move: ethnic entrepreneurs as urban change actors”. European Review20: 376–402
32.
KourtitKNijkampP (2013a) “In praise of megacities in a global world”. Regional Science Policy and Practice. (forthcoming)
33.
KourtitKNijkampPScholtenH (2013b) “The future of the New Urban World”. International Planning Studies. (forthcoming)
34.
KourtitKNijkampPPartridgeM (2013c) “Challenges of the New Urban World”. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy. (forthcoming)
35.
KourtitKNijkampP (2013d) “Creative buzz districts in smart cities”. Romanian Journal of Regional Science. (forthcoming)
36.
KramerJ PDiezJ R (2012) “Catching the local buzz by embedding?”. Regional Studies46: 1302–1317
37.
LonghiSNijkampPPootJ (2010) “Joint impacts of immigration on wages and employment: review and meta-analysis”. Journal of Geographical Systems12: 355–388
38.
McCannP (2008) “Globalization and economic geography: the world is curved, not flat”. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economics and Society1: 351–370
39.
MasurelENijkampPTastanMVindigniG (2002) “Motivations and performance conditions for ethnic entrepreneurship”. Growth and Change33: 238–260
40.
MauroP (1995) “Corruption and growth”. Quarterly Journal of Economics110: 681–712
41.
MorganK (1997) “The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal”. Regional Studies31: 491–503
42.
MusterdSDeurlooR (2006) “Amsterdam and the preconditions for a creative knowledge city”. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geographie91: 80–93
43.
NijkampP (2008) “XXQ factors for sustainable urban development: a systems economics view”. Romanian Journal of Regional Science2: 1–34
44.
NijkampP (2010) “Megacities: lands of hope and glory”. In: BuysSTanWTunesD (eds) Megacities: Exploring a Sustainable Future, Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, pp. 100–111
45.
Nijkamp P, Kourtit K, 2011, “Urban Europe scoping document”, Joint Programming Initiative, Urban Europe, VU University, Amsterdam
46.
NijkampPPootJ (2013) “Culture diversity measures”. In: BakensJNijkampPPootJ (eds) The Economics of Cultural Diversity, Cheltenham, Glos: Edward Elgar(forthcoming)
47.
OttavianoGPeriG (2006) “The economic value of cultural diversity: evidence from US cities”. Journal of Economic Geography6: 9–44
48.
Ozgen C, Nijkamp P, Poot J, 2011a, “Immigration and innovation in European Regions”, DP 5676, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
49.
Ozgen C, Nijkamp P, Poot J, 2011b, “The impact of cultural diversity on innovation: evidence from Dutch firm level data”, DP 6000, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
50.
Perdikogianni I, Penn A, 2005, “Measuring diversity: a multi-variate analysis of land use and temporal patterning in Clerkenwell”, in Proceedings of the 5th International Space Syntax Conference Delft …………………………………………………………….
51.
PolèseM (2009) The Wealth and Poverty of Regions: Why Cities Matter, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
52.
PorterM E (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London: Macmillan
53.
PugaD (2010) “The magnitude and causes of agglomeration economies”. Journal of Regional Science50: 203–219
54.
PykeFSengenbergerW (1992) “Industrial districts and local economic regeneration: research and policy issues”. In: PykeFSengenbergerW (eds) Industrial Districts and Local Economic Integration, Geneva: International Labour Organization, pp. 1–30
55.
ReidSGarnseyE (1998) “Incubation policy and resource provision: meeting the needs of young, innovative firms”. In: OakeyRDuringW (eds) New Technology Based Firms in the 1990s, London: Paul Chapman, pp. 67–80
56.
ReyS JAnselinL (2010) “PySAL: a Python library of spatial analytical methods”. In: FischerM MGetisA (eds) Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 175–193
57.
Rodríguez-PoseACrescenziR (2008) “Mountains in a flat world: why proximity still matters for the location of economic activity”. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society1: 371–388
58.
Rodríguez-PoseAFitjarR D (2013) “Buzz, archipelago economies and the future of intermediate and peripheral areas in a spiky world”. European Planning Studies21: 355–372
59.
SahinMRietdijkMNijkampP (2007) “Is cultural diversity a socio-economic opportunity?—A case of urban migrant entrepreneurs”. Innovation—The European Journal of Social Science Research22: 251–281
60.
SahinMNijkampPStoughR (2011) “Impact of urban conditions on firm performance of migrant entrepreneurs: a comparative Dutch–US study”. The Annals of Regional Science46: 661–689
61.
SahinMTodirasANijkampP (2012) “An explanatory model for the economic performance of migrant entrepreneurs in the high-tech sector”. In: NijkampPPootJSahinM (eds) Migration Impact Analysis: New Horizons, Cheltenham, Glos: Edward Elgar, pp. 227–260
62.
SassenS (1994) Cities in a World Economy, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
63.
Storper M, Venables A J, 2002, “Buzz: the economic force of the city”, paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference on ‘Industrial dynamics of the new and old economy: who is embracing whom?’, Copenhagen/Elsinore, 6–8 June, http://www.druid.dk/uploads/tx_picturedb/ds2002-652.pdf
64.
StorperMVenablesA J (2004) “Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy”. Journal of Economic Geography4: 351–370
65.
TorreAGillyJ P (2005) “Proximity and localization”. Regional Studies39: 47–59
66.
TranosEReggianiANijkampP (2013) “Accessibility of cities in the digital economy”. Cities30: 59–67
67.
van der PloegFPoelhekkeS (2008) “Globalization and the rise of mega-cities in the developing world”. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society1: 477–501
68.
VohoraAWrightMLockettA (2004) “Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies”. Research Policy33: 147–175
