The Russian state is strengthening its positions in the Arctic in order to exploit its resources, develop transport routes, and reverse depopulation trends in the country's northern regions. The ambitions of the Russian state to ‘recolonise’ the Arctic pose questions about the role of the region in the policy-making process dominated by the central state and the emerging geography of the Arctic. This article analyses these relationships using Murmansk Oblast’ as a case study. It argues that (i) there is a shift in Russia's Arctic policy – from withdrawal to re-engagement via mega-projects in energy and transport infrastructure sectors. Changes in global energy markets suggest that Arctic expansionism driven by energy projects is not sustainable; (ii) the policy framework remains incoherent as the central state revises its priorities; (iii) within the emerging polity, regions are neither ‘transmission belts’ of national policy nor independent players; instead, regions such as Murmansk Oblast’ are produced via multiscalar processes of policy making, institutionalisation, and discursive practices.
AlcantaraC (2013) Preferences, perceptions, and veto players: Explaining devolution negotiation outcomes in the Canadian territorial north. Polar Record49(2): 167–179.
2.
AlexandrovO (2009) Labyrinths of the Arctic policy. Russia in Global Affairs7(3): 110–118.
3.
AhlqvistTMoisioS (2014) Neoliberalisation in a Nordic state: From cartel polity towards a corporate polity in Finland. New Political Economy19(1): 21–55.
BlakkisrudH (2006) What's to be done in the North? In: BlakkisrudHHønnelandG (eds) Tackling Space: Federal Politics and the Russian North, Lanham, MD: University Press of America, pp. 25–51.
6.
Borgerson S (2013) The coming Arctic boom. As the ice melts, the region heats up. Foreign Affairs, July/August, pp. 76–89.
7.
BrennerN (2004) New State Spaces. Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Brenner N (2009) Open questions on state rescaling. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2(1): 123–139.
CoxK (2009) ‘Rescaling the state’ in question. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society2(1): 107–121.
11.
DixonM (2010a) Gazprom versus the skyline: Spatial displacement and social contention in St. Petersburg. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research34(1): 35–54.
12.
DixonM (2010b) Emerging Chinese role in shaping St. Petersburg's urban landscape: Interscalar investment strategies in the development of a residential megaproject. Eurasian Geography and Economics51(6): 803–819.
13.
DowleyK (1998) Striking the federal bargain in Russia: Comparative regional government strategies. Communist and Post-Communist Studies31(4): 359–380.
14.
FitjarRD (2013) Region-building in the Arctic periphery: The discursive construction of a petroleum region. Geografisca Annaler B95(1): 71–88.
15.
Gel'manV (2010) Leviathan's return. In: RossCCampbellA (eds) Federalism and Local Politics in Russia, London: Routledge, pp. 1–23.
16.
Government of Murmansk Oblast (2011) Strategiya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Murmanskoy oblasti do 2020 goda i na period do 2025 goda [Strategy for socio-economic development of Murmansk Oblast' for 2020 and until 2025]. Decision No. 693-ПП/15 from 23 December 2011.
17.
Government of Murmansk Oblast (2013) Strategiya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Murmanskoy oblasti do 2020 goda i na period do 2025 goda [Strategy of socio-economic development of Murmansk Oblast' for 2020 and until 2025]. Decision No. 768-ПП/20 from 25 December 2013.
18.
Government of Russia (2014a) Gosudarstvennaya programma Rossiyskoy Federatsii Sotsian'no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie Arkticheskoy zony Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2020 goda [Russian Federation state programme of Socio-economic development of the Arctic zone for 2020]. Decision No. 366 from 21 April 2014.
19.
Government of Russia (2014b) Pravitel'stvennaya komissiya po obespecheniyu rossiyskogo prisutstviya na Arkhipelage Shpitsbergen [Government Commission for the Russian Federation presence on the Spitsbergen Archipelago]. Available at: http://government.ru/department/131/about/ (accessed 8 January 2016).
20.
HeininenL (2012) State of the Arctic strategies and policies: A summary. In: HeininenL (ed.) Arctic Yearbook 2012, Akureyri: Northern Research Forum, pp. 2–47. . Available at: http://www.arcticyearbook.com/ay2012/ (accessed 8 January 2016).
21.
Heininen L, Sergunin A and Yarovoy G (2014) Russian strategies in the Arctic: Avoiding a new Cold War. Moscow: Valdai Discussion Club. Available at: http://www.uarctic.org/media/857300/arctic_eng.pdf (accessed 8 January 2016).
22.
HörnströmL (2013) Strong regions within the unitary state: The Nordic experience of regionalization. Regional & Federal Studies23(4): 427–443.
23.
JessopBBrennerNJonesM (2008) Theorizing socio-spatial relations. Environment and Planning D26(3): 389–401.
24.
Keating M (1997) The Political Economy of Regionalism. In: Keating M and Loughlin J (eds) The Political Economy of Regionalism. London: Frank Cass & Co, pp. 17–40.
25.
KeatingM (2008) Thirty years of territorial politics. West European Politics31(1–2): 60–81.
26.
KinossianN (2012) ‘Urban entrepreneurialism’ in the post-socialist city: Government-led urban development projects in Kazan, Russia. International Planning Studies17(4): 333–352.
27.
KinossianN (2013) Stuck in transition: Russian regional development policy between spatial polarization and equalization. Eurasian Geography and Economics54(5–6): 611–629.
28.
KinossianNMorganK (2014) Development by decree: The limits of ‘authoritarian modernization’ in the Russian Federation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38(5): 1678–1696.
29.
Klimenko E (2014) Russia's evolving Arctic strategy. Policy paper 42. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Solna. Available at: http://books.sipri.org/files/PP/SIPRIPP42.pdf (accessed 8 January 2016).
30.
KonyshevVSerguninA (2014) Is Russia a revisionist military power in the Arctic?Defence and Security Analysis30(4): 323–335.
LangT (2015) Socio-economic and political responses to regional polarisation and socio-spatial peripheralisation in Central and Eastern Europe: A research agenda. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin64(3): 171–185.
33.
LaruelleM (2012) Larger, higher, farther North... Geographical metanarratives of the nation in Russia. Eurasian Geography and Economics53(5): 557–574.
34.
LiYWuF (2013) The emergence of centrally initiated regional plans in China: A case study of Yangtze River Delta Regional Plan. Habitat International39: 137–147.
35.
LiZXuJYehAGO (2014) State rescaling and the making of city-regions in the Pearl River Delta, China. Environment and Planning C32(1): 129–143.
36.
McCannonJ (1998) Read Arctic: Polar Exploration and the Myth of the North in the Soviet Union 1932–1939, New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
McCannon J (2003) Tabula rasa in the North. The Soviet Arctic and mythic landscapes in Stalinist popular culture. In: Dobrenko E and Naiman E (eds) The Landscape of Stalinism. The Art and Ideology of Soviet Space. Seattle: The Washington University Press, pp. 241–260.
38.
McCannonJ (2012) A History of the Arctic: Nature, Exploration and Exploitation, London: Reaktion Books.
39.
Minregion (2010) Strategiya razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony Rossiyskoy Federatsii i obespecheniya natsional'noy besopasnosti na period do 2020 goda. Proekt [Strategy for development of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation and providing national security for 2020. Draft]. Unpublished document. Russian Ministry for Regional Development, Moscow.
40.
Moisio S (2008) Towards attractive and cost efficient state space: The political geography of state transformation in Finland. World Political Science Review 4(3): Article 2. Available at: http://www.bepress.com/wpsr/vol4/iss3/art2.
41.
MoisioSLuukkonenJ (2015) European spatial planning as governmentality: An enquiry into rationalities, techniques, and manifestations. Environment and Planning C33(4): 828–845.
42.
MoisioSPaasiA (2013) From geopolitical to geoeconomic? The changing political rationalities of state space. Geopolitics18(2): 267–283.
43.
MüllerM (2011) State dirigisme in megaprojects: Governing the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi. Environment and Planning A43(9): 2091–2108.
44.
Müller M (2015) How mega-events capture their hosts: Event seizure and the World Cup 2018 in Russia. Urban Geography. Epub ahead of print 2 December 2015. DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2015.1109951.
45.
Murmansk City Council (2009) General'nyy plan munitsipal'nogo obrazovaniya gorod Murmansk [General plan of the City of Murmansk]. Murmansk City Council. Decision No. 7-85 from 25 June 2009.
46.
Murmansk City Council (2012) Strategicheskiy plan sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya goroda Murmanska do 2020 goda [Strategic plan for socio-economic development for City of Murmansk for 2020]. Murmansk City Council. Decision No. 49-660 from 30 May 2012.
NelsonLKuzesI (2003) Political and economic coordination in Russia's federal district reform: A study of four regions. Europe-Asia Studies55(4): 507–520.
51.
NuurCLaestadiusS (2010) Development in peripheral regions: Case studies in Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies17(3): 293–307.
52.
OrttungRW (2004a) Key issues in the evolution of the federal okrugs and center–region relations under Putin. In: OrttungRWReddawayP (eds) The Dynamics of Russian Politics: Putin's Reform of Federal–Regional Relations, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 19–52.
53.
OrttungRW (2004b) Business and politics in the Russian regions. Problems of Post-Communism51(2): 48–60.
54.
OrttungRWZhemukhovS (2014) The 2014 Sochi Olympic mega-project and Russia's political economy. East European Politics30(2): 175–191.
55.
PaasiA (2009) The resurgence of the ‘Region’ and ‘Regional Identity’: Theoretical perspectives and empirical observations on regional dynamics in Europe. Review of International Studies35(S1): 121–146.
56.
PaasiA (2010) Regions are social constructs, but who or what ‘constructs’ them? Agency in question. Environment and Planning A42(10): 2296–2301.
57.
PaasiA (2011) The region, identity, and power. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences14: 9–16.
PagonisTThornleyA (2000) Urban development projects in Moscow: Market/state relations in the new Russia. European Planning Studies8(6): 751–766.
60.
ParkB-G (2013) State rescaling in Non-Western contexts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37(4): 1115–1122.
61.
Patrushev N (2013) Arkticheskie voyny. Zachem Rossii okhranyat' svoi ledyanye granitsy [Arctic wars. Why Russia has to defend its icy borders]. Interview of the Secretary of Russian Federation Security Council N. P. Patrushev with Argumenty i Fakty, 10 April 2013. Available at: http://www.scrf.gov.ru/news/22/778.html (accessed 8 January 2016).
Pelyasov A (2013) Russian strategy of the development of the Arctic zone and the provision of national security until 2020 (adopted by the President of the Russian Federation on February 8, 2013, № Pr-232). In: Heininen L (ed.) Arctic Yearbook 2014. Akureyri: Northern Research Forum. Available at: http://www.arcticyearbook.com/index.php/commentaries-2013#a10 (accessed 8 January 2016).
64.
President of Russia (2008a) Vystuplenie na zasedanii Soveta Bezopasnosti o ‘Zashchite natsionalnykh interesov Rossii v Arktike’ [Address at the Security Council meeting on ‘the Protection of Russia's national interests in the Arctic’]. Available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/1433 (accessed 8 January 2016).
65.
President of Russia (2008b) Osnovy gosudarstvennoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii v Arktike na period do 2008 goda i dalneyshuyu perspektivy [Foundations of the Russian Federation's state policy in the Arctic until 2020 and beyond]. Decree 1969 from 18 September 2008. Available at: http://www.scrf.gov.ru/documents/98.html (accessed 8 January 2016).
66.
President of Russia (2013) Strategiya razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony Rossiyskoy Federatsii i obespecheniya natsional'noy besopasnosti na period do 2020 goda [Strategy for development of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation and providing national security for 2020]. Decree 232 from 8 February 2013.
67.
President of Russia (2014) Vystuplenie na zasedanii Soveta Bezopasnosti po Povodu Realizatsii Gosudarstvennoy Politiki v Arktike [Address at the Security Council meeting concerning the implementation of the state policies in the Arctic]. Available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20845 (accessed 8 January 2016).
RasellM (2009) Neoliberalism in the North: The transformation of social policy in Russia's northern periphery. Polar Geography32(3–4): 91–109.
70.
RautioVTykkyläinenM (2008) Russia's Northern Regions on the Edge. Communities, Industries and Population from Murmansk to Magadan, Helsinki: Kikimora Publications.
71.
RoundJ (2005) Rescaling Russia's geography: The challenges of depopulating the Northern periphery. Europe-Asia Studies57(5): 705–727.
72.
RossC (2002) Federalism and Democratisation in Russia, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
73.
Rosstat (2002) Chislennost' naseleniya Rossii, sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii v sostave federal'nykh okrugov, rayonov, gorodskikh poseleniy, sel'skikh naselennykh punktov – rayonnykh tsentrov i sel'skikh naselennykh punktov s naseleniem 3 tysyachi i bolee chelovek [Population of Russia, Russian Federation subjects, districts, urban settlements, rural settlements – district centres and rural settlements with population above 3 thousand people]. The 2002 all-Russia population census. Available at: http://www.perepis2002.ru/ct/doc/1_TOM_01_04.xls (accessed 20 October 2014).
Rosstat (2014) Migratsionnyy prirost naseleniya po rayonam Kraynego Severa 2000–2012 [Migration-related Growth of Population in the Areas of the Far North 2000–2012]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/dbscripts/cbsd/dbinet.cgi?pl=9300130 (accessed 11 February 2014).
76.
SolliPEWilson RoweELindgrenWY (2013) Coming into the cold: Asia's Arctic interests. Polar Geography36(4): 253–270.
77.
Shestakov E (2009) Kholodnoe Nato (Cold NATO). Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 16 January 2009. Available at: http://www.rg.ru/2009/01/16/arktika.html (accessed 8 January 2016).
78.
Starodubtsev A (2014) Platit' Nelzya Proigryvat' [Cannot Pay or Lose]. Sankt-Petersburg: European University in Sankt-Petersburg.
TimofeevO (2015) Sanktsii vo l'dakh [Sanctions in the ice]. Redkie Zemli2(5): 14–21.
81.
TreninDBaevPK (2010) The Arctic: A View from Moscow, Washington, DC and Moscow: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
82.
Trumbull N (2010) Challenges to western participation in shaping the urban landscape of post-socialist St. Petersburg: The failure of international competitions for iconic architectural projects. Eurasian Geography and Economics 51(6): 788–802.
83.
ZiminD (2010) Promoting investment in Russia's regions. Eurasian Geography and Economics51(5): 653–668.
84.
ZimmerbauerK (2014) Constructing peripheral cross-border regions in planning: Territory-network interplay in the Barents region. Environment and Planning A46(11): 2718–2734.
