Allen, R. (2000) ‘Putting the Community back into Community Sentences’, in Criminal Justice Matters39, Spring.
2.
Barkley, D. and Collett, S. (2000) ‘Back to the Future: Housing and Support for Offenders’, in Probation Journal47(4), pp.235-243.
3.
CIH (Chartered Institute of Housing) (1998) Rehousing Sex Offenders - A Summary of the Legal and Operational Issues. Coventry: CIH.
4.
C of E (Council of Europe) (1992) The European Rules on Community Sanctions and Measures, Recommendation No. R (92) 16. Strasbourg: C of E.
5.
DETR (Dept. of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) (1999) Rehousing of Sex Offenders, 25 November (Letter to Chief Executives of all local authorities in England).
6.
D of E/D of H (Dept. of the Environment/Dept. of Health) (1996) Code of Guidance on Parts VI and VIII of the Housing Act 1996 - Allocation of Housing Accommodation - Homelessness, 2 0 December. London: D of E/D of H.
7.
Etzioni, A. (1999) The Limits of Privacy. New York: Basic Books.
8.
Grier, A. and Thomas, T. (2001) ‘The Employment of Ex-offenders and the UK’s new Criminal Record Bureau’, in European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research9(4), pp.459-469.
9.
Hebenton, B. and Thomas, T. (1997) Keeping Track? Observations on Sex Offender Registers in the US. P o l i c e Research Group. London: Home Office.
10.
HMIP (Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation) (1998) Exercising Constant Vigilance: the Role of the Probation Service in Protecting the Public from Sex Offenders. Report of a Thematic Inspection. London: HMSO.
11.
Home Office (1993) Protection of Children: Disclosure of Criminal B a c k g round of Those with Access to C h i l d re n (Circular 47/1993). London: HMSO.
12.
Home Office (1998) ‘Joyce Quinn Commends Rigorous Supervision of Sex O ffenders in the Community’, 28.4.98 (press release).
13.
Home Office (1999a) ‘Paul Boateng Announces New Name for Probation Service’, 1 December (press release).
14.
Home Office (1999b) Disclosure to the Employment Service of Restrictions that Should be Placed on the Employment of Potentially Dangerous Offenders (Probation Circular 48/1999).
15.
Home Office (1999c) Managing Dangerous People with Severe Personality Disorder: Consultation Paper. London: HMSO.
16.
Home Office (2000) National Standards for the Supervision of Offenders in the Community. London: HMSO.
17.
Home Office (2001a) ‘First Ombudsman for Offenders on Probation’, 31 August (press release).
18.
Home Office (2001b) ‘ F u n d a m e n t a l Change in Role for Probation Service - Blunkett’, 29 August (press release).
19.
Home Office (2001c) Initial Guidance to the Police and Probation Services on Sections 67-8 of the Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000. London: HMSO.
20.
Home Office (2001d) Consultation Paper on the Review of Part 1 of the Sex Offenders Act 1997. London: HMSO.
21.
Kawachi, I. (1997) ‘Long Live Community: Social Capital As Public Health’, in The American Prospect. www.prospect.org/print/V8/kawachi.html
22.
Maguire, M. , Raynor, P., Vanstone, M. and Kynch, J. (1998) Voluntary After-Care, Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate, Research Findings 73. London: Home Office.
23.
Maguire, M. , Raynor, P., Vanstone, M. and Kynch, J. (2000) ‘Voluntary After-Care and the Probation Service: a Case of Diminishing Responsibility’, in Howard Journal of Criminal Justice39(3), pp.234-248.
24.
Maguire, M , Kemshall, H, Noaks, L. and Wincup, E. (2001) Risk Management and Violent Offenders: The Work of Public Protection Panels, Police Research Series 139, Home Office Policing and Reducing Crime Unit. London: Home Office.
25.
Parratt, L. (1998) Criminal Record Certificates: a Recipe for Disaster?London: Liberty.
26.
Plotnikoff, J. and Woolfson, R (2000) Where Are They Now?: an Evaluation of Sex Offender Registration in England and Wales, Police Research Series Paper 126. London: Home Office.
27.
Prins, H. (1999) Will They Do It Again?London: Routledge.
28.
Thomas, T. (2001a) ‘Supervising Child Sex Offenders in the Community: Some Observations on Law and Practice in England and Wales, the Republic of Ireland and Sweden,’ in European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice9(1), pp.69-90.
29.
Thomas, T. (2001b) ‘Sex Offenders, the Home Office and the Sunday Papers’, in Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law23(1), pp.103-108.
30.
Tuddenham, R (2000) ‘ B e y o n d Defensible Decision Making: To w a r d s Reflexive Assessment of Risk and Dangerousness’, in Probation Journal47(3), pp.173-184.
31.
UN (United Nations) (1990) S t a n d a rd Minimum Rules for Non-Custodial Measures (the ‘Tokyo Rules’), UN.