This article reviews the use of home detention with electronic monitoring in New Zealand, drawing on research undertaken in 2001. The discussion considers the impact of home detention on women who are subject to this disposal, as well as the impact on the women and children who support those on home detention. The research found that most women were positive about this option but increased tensions in the home and deprivation of liberty for some families are disadvantages of the scheme.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, H. (1987) Justice Unbalanced: Gender, Psychiatry and Judicial Decisions. Milton Keynes: Open University Press .
2.
Carlen, P. (1998) Sledgehammer: Women’s Imprisonment at the Millennium. London: Macmillan .
3.
Chesney-Lind, M. (2000) ‘Women and the Criminal Justice System: Gender Matters’, in Topics in Community Corrections, Annual Issue 2000, pp. 7–10. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections .
4.
Church, A. & Dunstan, S. (1997) Home Detention: The Evaluation of the Home Detention Pilot Programme 1995–1997. Wellington: Ministry of Justice .
5.
Dodgson, K. & Mortimer, E. (2000) Home Detention Curfew–The First Year of Operation. Research Findings 110. London: Home Office .
6.
Dodgson, K., Goodwin, P., Howard, P., Llewellyn-Thomas, S., Mortimer, E., Russell, N. & Weiner, M. (2001) Electronic Monitoring of Released Prisoners: an Evaluation of the Home Detention Curfew Scheme. Home Office Research Study 222. London: Home Office .
7.
Doherty, D. (1995) ‘Impressions of the Impact of the Electronic Monitoring Program on the Family’, in K. Schulz (ed.), Electronic Monitoring and Corrections: The Policy, The Operation, The Research. Canada: Simon Fraser University .
8.
Enos, R., Holman, J.E. & Caroll, M.E. (1992) Alternative Sentencing. Indiana: Wyndhamhall .
9.
Gibbs, A. & King, D. (2001) The Electronic Ball and Chain? The Development, Operation and Impact of Home Detention in New Zealand. Dunedin: Community and Family Studies, University of Otago .
10.
Gibbs, A. & King, D. (2002). Home Detention with Electronic Monitoring in New Zealand and its Implications , in VISTA7 (2), Summer 2002, pp. 100–110 .
11.
Liverani, R.M. (1998) ‘Slow take-up for Home Detention: Magistrates cool, many lawyers unaware of the option’ , in Law Society Journal, February Issue, pp. 42–48 .
12.
Lilly, R. & Nellis, M. (2001) ‘Home Detention Curfew and the Future of Electronic Monitoring’ , in Prison Service Journal, May Issue, pp. 59–69 .
13.
Mortimer, E. & Mair, G. (1997) Curfew Orders with Electronic Monitoring: The First Twelve Months. Research Findings No. 51. London: Home Office .
14.
Nellis, M. (2000) ‘Law and Order: The Electronic Monitoring of Offenders’, in D.P. Dolowitz (ed.) Policy Transfer and British Social Policy Learning from the USA? Philadelphia: OUP .
15.
Payne, B.K. & Gainey, R.R. (1998) ‘A Qualitative Assessment of the Pains Experienced on Electronic Monitoring’ , in International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology42, pp. 149–163 .
16.
Payne, B.K. & Gainey, R.R. (2000) ‘Electronic Monitoring: Philosophical, Systemic, and Political Issues’ , in Journal of Offender Rehabilitation31, pp. 93–111 .
17.
Schultz, K. (ed.) (1995) Electronic Monitoring and Corrections: The Policy, The Operation, The Research. Canada: Simon Fraser University .
18.
Spier, P. (2000) Conviction and Sentencing of Offenders in New Zealand: 1990–1999. Wellington: Ministry of Justice .
19.
Spier, P. (2001) Conviction and Sentencing of Offenders in New Zealand: 1991–2000. Wellington: Ministry of Justice .
20.
Whitaker, M. (2000) ‘Responding to Women Offenders: Equitable Does Not Mean Identical’, in Topics in Community Corrections, Annual Issue 2000, pp. 4–6. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections .
21.
Whitfield, D. (1997) Tackling The Tag: The Electronic Monitoring of Offenders. Winchester, UK: Waterside Press .
22.
Whitfield, D. (2001) The Magic Bracelet: Technology and Offender Supervision. Winchester, UK: Waterside Press .
