In addressing human trafficking, probation services play a key role in identifying victims, providing support, working to prevent exploitation and reduce the potential for re-exploitation. In a world-first scoping review, this paper maps emerging empirical research on probation practices with justice-involved people subjected to exploitation and identifies gaps in research to inform policy and practice.
ArkseyHO’MalleyL (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology8(1): 19–32.
2.
BathEGodoySPerrisG, et al. (2021) Perspectives of girls and young women affected by commercial sexual exploitation: mHealth as a tool to increase engagement in care. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved32(2): 128–147.
3.
BaylsonM (2017) Victim or criminal? Street-level prostitutes and the criminal justice system. In: Hail-JonesKShdaimahCSLeonCS (eds) Victim or criminal? Street-level prostitutes and the criminal justice system in. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 244–256.
4.
BowmanMENolanBLyngeA, et al. (2025) Survivors of human trafficking who are parents: considerations and challenges. Child Welfare102(4): 53–92.
5.
BroadR (2024) Responding to women in prison for modern slavery offending. Prison Service Journal274: 11–19.
6.
BurkeBMcCauleyHRackowA, et al. (2015) Implementing a coordinated care model for sex trafficked minors in smaller cities. Journal of Applied Research on Children6(1): Art. 7.
7.
BurlandP (2023) Still punishing the wrong people: the criminalisation of potential trafficked cannabis gardeners. In: CraigCBalchALewisHWaiteL (eds) The Modern Slavery Agenda: Policy, Politics and Practice. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 167–186.
8.
CasassaKEnglandGKarandikarS (2024) “I needed people to tell me no”: exploring how participation in a human trafficking specialty docket affects survivors’ of sex trafficking experiences of trauma bonding. Victims & Offenders19(8): 1541–1559.
9.
CockbainE (2018) Offender and Victim Networks in Human Trafficking. London: Routledge.
10.
DollingerB (2019) Help wanted? A narrative look at penal welfarism ‘from below’. Youth Justice19(2): 120–136.
11.
DuncanADeHareD (2019) Provider perspectives on sex trafficking: victim pathways, service needs, & blurred boundaries. Victims & Offenders14(4): 510–531.
12.
EspeuteSLanskeyC (2023) An exploration of police discretion in the identification of child victims of country lines drug trafficking. Policing & Society33(9): 1031–1050.
13.
FindlayJ (2025) Modern slavery, victim identification and the ‘victimized state’. The British Journal of Criminology65(3): 504–520.
14.
FirminC (2000) Contextual safeguarding. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation Academic Insights 2020/07.
15.
GaddD (2024) Misleading the world on modern slavery? Reassessing the impact of the UK’s anti-trafficking agenda. International Criminology4(4): 315–322.
16.
GarlandD (2017) Punishment and welfare. In: LieblingAMarunaSMcAraL (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 77–97.
17.
GotchK (2016) Preliminary data on a sample of perpetrators of domestic trafficking for sexual exploitation: suggestions for research and practice. Journal of Human Trafficking2(10): 99–109.
18.
GottliebMHassMDanielM, et al. (2021) The scoping review: a flexible, inclusive, and iterative approach to knowledge synthesis. Academic Emergency Medicine Education and Training5(3): e10609.
19.
GreyK (2023) County lines in prison. In: AndellPPittsJ (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Youth Gangs in the UK. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 473–488.
20.
GruberACohenAMogulescuK (2016) Penal welfare and the new human trafficking courts. Florida Law Review68(5): 1333–1402.
21.
HackerDLevine-FraimanYHaliliI (2015) Ungendering and regendering shelters for survivors of human trafficking. Social Inclusion3(1): 35–51.
22.
HalesLGelsthorpeL (2013) The criminalisation of migrant women – research findings and policy and practice implications. Prison Service Journal206: 25–30.
23.
HallS (2015) Why probation matters. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice54: 321–335.
24.
HeysA (2023) The UK’s statutory defence for victims of modern slavery and its narrow understanding of victimhood. The Journal of Criminal Law87(4): 237–251.
25.
HillLHefnerMK (2024) Successes and challenges in implementing a human trafficking screening tool in a local detention center. Journal of Applied Social Science18(1): 241–258.
26.
Independent Commission for Aid Impact (2020) The UK’s approach to tackling modern slavery through the aid programme: A review. Independent Commission for Aid Impact.
27.
JovanovićMBurlandPToppV, et al. (2024) The responsibility of prisons for securing the rights of modern slavery survivors: Prisons as a safe house?. Prison Service Journal274: 38–47.
28.
KuligTButlerL (2019) From “whores” to “victims”: the rise and status of sex trafficking courts. Victims & Offenders14(3): 299–321.
29.
LoveDFukushimaARogersT, et al. (2023) Challenges to reintegration: a qualitative intrinsic case-study of convicted female sex traffickers. Feminist Criminology18(1): 24–44.
30.
LuminaisMLovellRMcGuireM (2019) A safe harbor is temporary shelter not a pathway forward: how court-mandated sex trafficking intervention fails to help girls quit the sex trade. Victims & Offenders14(5): 540–560.
31.
MajicS (2014) Beyond “victim-criminals”: sex workers, nonprofit organizations, and gender ideologies. Gender & Society28(3): 463–485.
32.
MarlattG (1996) Harm reduction: come as you are. Addictive Behaviors21(6): 779–788.
33.
Miner-RomanoffK (2017) CATCH Court: changing actions to change habits – a preliminary evaluation study. Journal of Human Trafficking3(2): 136–162.
34.
MurnanAEnglandGMatthewsC, et al. (2024) “They don’t give a damn about us”: a qualitative study on experiences and perceptions underlying racial disparities in sex trafficking speciality docket programs. Journal of Human Trafficking: 1–15.
35.
MustoJ (2013) Domestic minor sex trafficking and the detention-to-protection pipeline. Dialectical Anthropology37: 257–276.
36.
MustoJ (2016) Control and protect: Collaboration, carceral protection, and domestic sex trafficking in the United States. Oakland: Univ of California Press.
37.
NashMGrantJ (2025) Thinking about safeguarding. In: HaggarLMcDermottM (eds) Reflections on Probation: A Companion Resource for Developing Practitioners. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 99115.
38.
National Crime Agency (NCA) (2016) County lines gang violence, exploitation and drug supply 2016. Drug Threat Team, Organised Crime Command.
39.
NicholsAOberstaedtMSlutskerS, et al. (2025) Practitioners’ perspectives of family involved sex trafficking of minors: implications for practice. Journal of Family Violence40: 701–713.
40.
NicholsASlutskerSOberstaedtM, et al. (2023) Team approaches to addressing sex trafficking of minors: promising practices for a collaborative model. Societies13: 66.
41.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ372(n71).
42.
PerkinsERuizC (2017) Domestic minor sex trafficking in a rural state: interviews with adjudicated female juveniles. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal34: 171–180.
43.
RizoCWretmanCLuoJ, et al. (2024) Human trafficking in correctional institutions: a survey of correctional and anti-trafficking leaders. Journal of Human Trafficking10(1): 135–152.
44.
RodriguezSBen-MosheLRakesL (2020) Carceral protectionism and the perpetually (in)vulnerable. Criminology & Criminal Justice20(5): 537–550.
45.
SandyLNes-IadicolaPMatthewsD (2025) Reconceptualizing Exiting and Career Development in Sex Work: Work Like Any Other. Switzerland: Palgrave.
46.
SandyLSnowdenATangenJ, et al. (2024) Barriers and opportunities for prison services in developing reintegrative pathways for justice-involved people subjected to exploitation. Prison Service Journal274: 20–29.
47.
SeniorPWardDwithBurkeL, et al. (2016) The essence of probation. British Journal of Community Justice14(1): 9–27.
48.
ShdaimahCFrankeNBeckerT, et al. (2023) Of house and home: the meanings of housing for women engaged in criminalised street-based sex work. Anti-trafficking Review20: 54–74.
49.
SteadVDaviesL (2021) Unfree labour and Australia’s obscured Pacific histories: towards a new genealogy of modern slavery. Journal of Australian Studies45(3): 400–416.
50.
SurteesR (2008) Traffickers and trafficking in southern and eastern Europe: considering the other side of human trafficking. European Journal of Criminology5(1): 39–68.
51.
The Inter-Agency Coordination Group against Trafficking in Persons (ICAT) (2020) Non- Punishment of Victims of Trafficking, Issue Brief August 2020.
52.
TomczakPBuckG (2019) The penal voluntary sector: a hybrid sociology. The British Journal of Criminology59(4): 898–918.
53.
UN (2000) Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children (A/RES/55/25).
54.
United Nations (UN) (2015) Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1).
55.
WroeLE (2021) Young people and “county lines”: a contextual and social account. Journal of Children’s Services16(1): 39–55.
56.
WroeLEOwensRLloydJ, et al. (2025) From ‘risky choices’ to ‘risky contexts’? The state of play of UK child welfare responses to adolescent ‘extra-familial harm’. National and international implications. British Journal of Social Work55: 3414–3434.
57.
YoungCMFRobinsonT (2025) Amplified victimisation: contextualizing misogynoir, sex trafficking and trauma. Victims & Offenders20(5-6): 1142–1166.
