Two studies examined the process by which romantic relationship partners who report lower self-expansion in their relationship come to show greater interest in their alternatives. We tested predictions based on the alternatives literature in which lacking relationship-derived self-expansion would lead to failures of motivational bias (i.e., devaluing attractive alternatives) and perceptual bias (i.e., failing to notice attractive alternatives) to influence perceptions of alternatives. We conducted two cross-sectional studies, one designed to test failure of the motivational bias and one the perceptual bias. Results supported the predictions, indicating that both biases fail to operate in individuals whose current romantic relationship provides insufficient self-expansion. We discuss implications for relationship outcomes, as well as for the theoretical understanding of alternatives.
Agnew, C.R., Arriaga, X.B., & Wilson, J.E. ( 2008). Committed to what? Using the Bases of Relational Commitment Model to understand continuity and changes in social relationships. In J. P. Forgas & J. Fitness (Eds.), Social relationships: Cognitive, affective and motivational processes (pp. 147-164). New York: Psychology Press.
2.
Aron, A., & Aron, E.N. ( 1997). Self-expansion motivation and including other in the self. In W. Ickes (Section Ed.) & S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd Edition, Vol. 1, pp. 251-270). London: Wiley.
3.
Aron, A., Aron, E.N., & Norman, C. ( 2004). Self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond. In Self and social identity (pp. 99-123). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
4.
Aron, A., Aron, E.N., & Smollan, D. ( 1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
5.
Aron, A., Paris, M., & Aron, E.N. ( 1995). Falling in love: Prospective studies of self-concept change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1102-1112.
6.
Aron, E.N., & Aron, A. ( 1996). Love and the expansion of the self: The state of the model. Personal Relationships, 3, 45-58.
7.
Bargh, J.A., Gollwitzer, P.M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Trotschel, R. ( 2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 81, 1014-1027.
8.
Buss, D.M., & Shackelford, T.K. (1997). Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research in Personality , 31, 193-221.
9.
Cooper, J. ( 2007). Cognitive dissonance: Fifty years of a classic theory . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Festinger, L. ( 1957, reprinted 1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (p. 291). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
Gollwitzer, P.M., & Sheeran, P. ( 2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol 38, pp. 69-119). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
Johnson, D.J., & Rusbult, C.E. ( 1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 967-980.
13.
Kelley, H.H., Holmes, J.G., Kerr, N.L., Reis, H.T., Rusbult, C.E., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations (pp. xii, 506). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Le, B., & Agnew, C.R. ( 2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37-57.
15.
Lewandowski, G.W., Jr. , & Ackerman, R.A. (2006). Something’s missing: Need fulfillment and self-expansion as predictors of susceptibility to infidelity . Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 389-403.
16.
Lewandowski, G.W., Jr. , & Aron, A. (2002). The self-expansion scale: Construction and validation. In Third Annual Meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. Savannah, GA.
17.
Miller, R.S. ( 1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 758-766.
18.
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. ( 2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36, 717-731.
19.
Reis, H.T., Collins, W.A., & Berscheid, E. ( 2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development . Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844-872.
20.
Rusbult, C.E. ( 1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101-117.
21.
Rusbult, C.E., Martz, J.M., & Agnew, C.R. ( 1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-391.
22.
Schlenker, B.R., Britt, T.W., & Pennington, J.W. (1996). Impression regulation and management: A theory of self-identification. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (Vol 3, pp. 118-147). New York: Guilford Press.
23.
Thibaut, J.W., & Kelley, H.H. ( 1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
24.
White, R.W. ( 1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of confidence. Psychological Review, 66, 297-333.
