Scholars have paid increasing attention to the role of non-verbal communication within intimate relationships. Reportedly, immediate behaviors such as touch escalate opposite-sex relationships by promoting increased intimacy and psychological closeness. This study examined the effects of relational stage, gender and touch avoidance on unobtrusively coded public touch behavior. An ANOVA indicated that relational stage was curvilinearly related to public interpersonal touch such that the level of touch was higher in intermediate stage of relationships than in either initial or stable stages. Gender had no effect on touch. Instead, a high correlation was found between the amount of touch used by males and the amount of touch used by their female partners. Touch avoidance was found to be linearly related to the amount of touch displayed, with low touch avoiders touching the most and high touch avoiders touching the least. There was a strong additive effect for touch avoidance, with all three touch avoidance groups following a curvilinear pattern for relational stage. x2 tests found that touch increased primarily in the hand and waist areas during the intermediate stage. Implications for the study of reciprocity, immediacy, intimacy and stage theory are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altman, I. & Taylor, D.A. (1973) Social Penetrations: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
2.
Andersen. J.F. , Andersen, P.A. & Lustig, M.W. (1987) `Opposite Sex Touch Avoidance; A National Replication and Extension', Journal of Nonverbal Behavior11: 89-109.
3.
Andersen, P.A. (1984) `An Arousal-valence Model of Nonverbal Immediacy Exchange', paper presented at the annual convention of the Central States Speech Association (April), Chicago, IL.
4.
Andersen. P.A. (1985) `Nonverbal Immediacy in Interpersonal Communication', in A.W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (eds) Multichannel Integrations of Nonverbal Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Andersen. P.A. (1989) `A Cognitive Valence Theory of Intimate Communication', paper presented to second conference of the International Network on Personal Relations (May) Iowa City, IA.
6.
Andersen. P.A. & Guerrero, L.K. (1989) `Avoiding Communication: Verbal and Nonverbal Dimensions of Defensiveness', paper presented to the annual convention of the Western Speech Communication Association (February), Spokane, WA.
7.
Andersen, P.A. & Leibowitz, K. (1978) `The Development and Nature of the Construct Touch Avoidance', Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior3: 89-106.
8.
Andersen, P.A. & Sull, K.J. (1985) `Out of Touch Out of Reach: Tactile Predispositions as Predictors of Interpersonal Distance'. Western Journal of Speech Communication49: 57-72.
9.
Beier, E.G. & Sternberg, D.P. (1977) `Subtle Cues between Newlyweds', Journal of I Communication27: 92-96.
10.
Berg, J.H. (1984) `The Development of Friendship between Roommates', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46: 346-356.
11.
Berg, J.H. & McQuinn, H. (1986) `Attraction and Exchange in Continuing and Noncontinuing Dating Relationships', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50: 942-952.
12.
Berger, C.R. & Calabrese, R.J. (1975) `Some Explorations in Initial Interaction and Beyond: Toward a Theory of Interpersonal Communication', Human Communication Research1: 99-112.
13.
Blalock, H.M. (1979) Social Statistics, 2nd edn.New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Blumstein, P. & Schwartz, P.W. (1983) American Couples. New York: Pocket Books.
15.
Buck, R. (1979) `Individual Differences in Nonverbal Sending Accuracy and Electrodermal Responding: The Externalizing-internalizing Dimension', in R. Rosenthal (ed.) Skill in Nonverbal Communication: Individual Differences. Cambridge, MA: Oglgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
16.
Burgoon, J.K. & Aho, L. (1982) `Three Field Experiments on the Effects of Violations of Conversational Distance', Communication Monographs49: 71-88.
17.
Burgoon, J.K. & Jones, S.B. (1976) `Toward a Theory of Personal Space Expectations and their Violations', Human Communication Research2: 131-146.
18.
Burgoon, J.K. , Buller, D.B. & Woodall, W.G. (1989) Nonverbal Communication: the Unspoken Dialogue. New York: Harper & Row.
19.
Capella, J.N. & Greene, J.O. (1982) `A Discrepancy-arousal Explanation of Mutual Influence in Expressive Behavior for Adult and Infant-adult Interaction', Communication Monograph49: 89-114.
20.
Cohen, J. (1977) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press.
21.
Cronbach, L.J. (1951) `Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests', Psychometricka16: 297-334.
22.
Derlega, V. , Wilson, M. & Chaikin, D.L. (1976) `Friendship and Disclosure Reciprocity', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology34: 578-582.
23.
Duck, S.W. (1988) Relating to Others. Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press.
24.
Duck, S.W. & Miell, E.E. (1986) `Charting the Development of Personal Relationships', in R. Gilmour & S.W. Duck (eds) The Emerging Field of Personal Relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Fromme, D.K. , Fromme, M.L., Brown, S., DanielI, J., Taylor, D.K. & Rountree, J.R. (1986) `Attitudes toward Touch: Cross-validation and the Effects of Gender and Acquaintanceship', Rassegna di Psicologia3: 49-63.
26.
Givens, D.B. (1978) `The Nonverbal Basis of Attraction: Flirtations, Courtship, and Seduction'. Psychiatry41: 346-359.
27.
Givens, D.B. (1983) Love Signals. New York: Crown Books.
28.
Goffman, E (1971) Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.
29.
Gouldner, A.W. (1960) `The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement', American Sociological Review25: 161-178.
30.
Hatfield, E. (1984) `The Dangers of Intimacy', in V.J. Derlega (ed.) Communication, Intimacy, and Close Relationships. New York: Academic Press.
31.
Hays, R.B. (1985) `A Longitudinal Study of Friendship Development', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology48: 909-924.
32.
Henley, N.M. (1973) `Status and Sex: Some Touching Observations', Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society2: 91-93.
33.
Henley, N.M. (1977) Body Politics: Power, Sex, and Nonverbal Communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
Heslin, R. (1978) `Responses to Touching as an Index of Sex-role Norms and Attitudes', paper presented at the annual symposium of the American Psychological Association (April), Toronto, Canada.
35.
Heslin, R. & Alper, T. (1983) `Touch: A Bonding Gesture', in J.M. Wiemann & R. Harrison (eds) Nonverbal Interaction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Heslin, R. , Nguyen, T.D. & Nguyen, M.L. (1983) `Meaning of Touch: The Case of Touch from a Stranger or Same Sex Person', Journal of Nonverbal Behavior7: 147-157.
37.
Hickson, M.L. & Stacks, D.W. (1985) NVCNonverbal Communication: Studies and Applications. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
38.
Honeycutt, J.M. , Cantrill, J.G. & Greene, R.W. (1989) `Memory Structures for Relational Escalation: A Cognitive Test of the Sequencing of Relational Actions and Stages', Human Communication Research16: 62-70.
39.
Jones, S.E. (1986) `Sex Differences in Touch Communication', Western Journal of Speech Communication50: 227-241.
40.
Jourard, S.M. (1966) `An Exploratory Study of Body Accessibility', British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology5: 221-231.
41.
Knapp, M.L. (1984) Interpersonal Communication and Human Relationships. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
42.
Major, B. (1981) `Gender Patterns in Touching Behavior', in C. Mayo & N.M. Henley (eds) Gender and Nonverbal Behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
43.
Mehrabian, A. (1969) `Some Referents and Measures of Nonverbal Behavior', Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation1: 203-207.
44.
Morris, D. (1977) Manwatching: A Field Guide to Human Behavior. New York: Abrams.
45.
Nguyen, M.L. , Heslin, R. & Nguyen, T. (1976) `The Meaning of Touch: Sex and Marital Status Differences', Representative Research in Social Psychology7: 13-18.
46.
Nguyen, T. , Heslin, R. & Nguyen, M.L. (1975) `The Meaning of Touch: Sex Differences', Journal of Communication25: 92-103.
Patterson, M.L. (1982) `A Sequential-functional Model of Nonverbal Exchange', Psychological Review89: 231-249.
49.
Patterson, M.L. (1983) Nonverbal Behavior: A Functional Perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.
50.
Patterson, M.L. (1988). `Functions of Nonverbal Behavior in Close Relationships', in S.W. Duck (ed.) Handbook of Personal Relationships. New York: John Wiley.
51.
Rosenfeld, L.B. , Kartus, S. & Ray, C. (1976) `Body Accessibility Revisited', Journal of Communication26: 27-30.
52.
Sorenson, G.A. (1979) `The Effects of Touch on Interpersonal Perceptions', paper presented at the annual convention of the Eastern Communication Association (May), Philadelphia, PA.
53.
Stier, D.S. & Hall, J.A. (1984) `Gender Differences in Touch: An Empirical and Theoretical Review', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology47; 440-459.
54.
Summerhayes, D.L. & Suchner, R. W. (1978) `Power Implications of Touch in Malefemale Relationships', Sex Roles4: 103-110.
55.
Thayer, S. (1986) `Touch: Frontier of Intimacy', Journal of Nonverbal Behavior10: 7-11.
56.
Weitz, S. (ed.) (1974) Nonverbal Communication: Readings with Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.
