By centering on the assumption that clear conceptualization precedes appropriate measurement, four methods for defining and enumerating personal networks are detailed. Global networks are defined in terms of the domain from which all other personal networks are derived. The three additional types, including significant other, exchange and interactive networks, are conceptually unique and largely non-overlapping in their memberships. The network types reviewed here do not exhaust all of the methods available for sampling personal networks, but they do represent methods with favorable psychometric properties and, most importantly, clear conceptual foundations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antonucci, T.C. (1986) `Measuring Social Support Networks', Generations10: 10-12.
2.
Barnes, J.A. (1954) `Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish', Human Relations7: 39-58.
3.
Barrera, M. (1981) `Social Support in the Adjustment of Pregnant Adolescents', in B.H. Gottlieb (ed.) Social Networks and Social Support, pp. 69-96. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Bernard, H.R. , Killworth, P.D., Kronenfeld, D. & Sailer, L. (1984) `On the Validity of Retrospective Data: The Problem of Informant Accuracy', Annual Review of Anthropology13: 495-517.
5.
Bernard, H.R. , Johnsen, E.C., Killworth, P.D., McCarty, C., Shelley, G.A. & Robinson, S. (1990) `Comparing Four Different Methods for Measuring Personal Social Networks', Social Networks12: 179-215.
6.
Bolger, N. , DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. & Schilling, E. (1989) `Effects of Daily Stress on Negative Mood', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57: 808-818.
7.
Broese van Groenou, M. , van Sonderen, E. & Ormel, J. (1990) `Test-retest Reliability of Personal Network Delineation', in C.P.M. Knipscheer & T.C. Antonucci (eds) Social Network Research, pp. 121-136. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
8.
Fischer, C.S. (1982) To Dwell Among Friends. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Freeman, L.C. & Thompson. C.R. (1989) `Estimating Acquaintanceship Volume', in M. Kochen (ed.) The Small World, pp. 147-158. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10.
Johnson, M.P. & Milardo, R. (1984) `Network Interference in Pair Relationships', Journal of Marriage and the Family46: 893-899.
11.
Kashy, D.A. & Kenny, D.A. (1990) `Do You Know Whom You Were With a Week Ago Friday?', Social Psychology Quarterly53: 55-61.
12.
Killworth, P.D. , Bernard, H.R. & McCarty, C. (1984) `Measuring Patterns of Acquaintanceship', Current Anthropology23: 318-397.
13.
Killworth, P.D. , Johnsen, E.C., Bernard, H.R., Shelley, G.A. & McCarty, C. (1990) `Estimating the Size of Personal Networks', Social Networks12: 289-312.
14.
McCallister, L.J. & Fischer, C.A. (1978) `Studying Egocentric Networks by Mass Survey', Working Paper No. 184. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley, University of California.
15.
Marsden, P.V. (1987) `Core Discussion Networks of Americans', American Sociological Review52: 122-131.
16.
Marsden, P.V. (1990) `Network Data and Measurement', Annual Review of Sociology16: 435-463.
17.
Milardo, R. (1988) `Families and Social Networks: An Overview of Theory and Methodology', in R. Milardo (ed.) Families and Social Networks, pp. 13-47. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Milardo, R. (1989) `Theoretical and Methodological Issues in the Identification of the Social Networks of Spouses', Journal of Marriage and the Family51: 165-174.
19.
Milardo, R. , Johnson, M.P. & Huston, T. (1983) `Developing Close Relationships', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology44: 964-976.
20.
Pool, I. & Kochen, M. (1989) `Contacts and Influence', in M. Kochen (ed.) The Small World, pp. 3-51. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
21.
Rands, M. (1988) `Changes in Social Networks following Marital Separation and Divorce', in R. Milardo (ed.) Families and Social Networks, pp. 127-146. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
Rapkin, B.D. & Stein, C.H. (1989) `Defining Personal Networks', American Journal of Community Psychology17: 259-267.
23.
Reis, H.T. & Wheeler, L. (1991) `Studying Social Interaction with the Rochester Interaction Record', Advances in Experimental Social Psychology24: 269-318.
24.
Rook, K.S. (1992) `Detrimental Aspects of Social Relationships', in H.O. Veiel & U. Baumann (eds) The Meaning and Measurement of Social Support, pp. 157-169. New York: Hemisphere.
25.
Surra, C.A. & Milardo, R. (1991) `The Social Psychological Context of Developing Relationships', in W.H. Jones & D. Perlman (eds) Advances in Personal Relationships, Vol. 3, pp. 1-36. London: Kingsley.
26.
Ulin, M. & Milardo, R. (1992) `Network Interdependence and Lesbian Relationships', paper presented at the VI International Conference on Personal Relationships (July).
27.
van Sonderen, E. , Ormel, J., Brilman, E. & van den Heuvell, C. (1990) `Personal Network Delineation', in C.P.M. Knipscheer & T.C. Antonucci (eds) Social Network Research, pp. 101-120. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
28.
Wellman, B. (1979) `The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers', American Journal of Sociology84: 1201-1231.
29.
Wellman, B. , Carrington, P. & Hall, A. (1988) `Networks as Personal Communities', in B. Wellman & S. Berkowitz (eds) Social Structures: A Network Approach, pp. 130-184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
