Commitment to Dating Relationships and Cross-Sex Friendships in America and China

Abstract

A cross-sectional survey study examined commitment processes in the dating relationships and cross-sex friendships of young adults residing in the United States or Taiwan. Feelings of commitment were stronger in relationships with greater satisfaction, poorer quality alternatives, greater investment size and greater centrality of relationship. However, there was little evidence that commitment was influenced by normative support for a relationship. The relationship between commitment and satisfaction was stronger for dating relationships than for friendships, as was the relationship between commitment and alternatives. Dispositions appeared to affect commitment primarily in indirect ways. For example, self-esteem, psychological femininity and perspective-taking were associated with features of interdependence such as perceived alternative quality or willingness to invest, which in turn were related to feelings of commitment. Finally, Americans reported weaker commitment than would be expected given other features of their interdependence with partners. The port and extend the generalizability of Rusbult's investment model.

Keywords

commitment in relationships cross-sex friendships dating relationships Rusbult's investment model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bem, S.L. (1974) `The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny', Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 47: 155-162.

Davis, M.H. (1983) `Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44: 113-126.

Dion, K.L. & Dion, K.K. (1988) `Romantic Love: Individual and Cultural Perspectives', in R.J. Sternberg & M.L. Barnes (eds) The Psychology of Love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Doi, L.T. (1973) The Anatomy of Dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha International.

Driscoll, R. , Davis, K.E. & Lipetz, M.E. (1972) `Parental Interference and Romantic Love: The Romeo and Juliet Effect', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24: 1-10.

Hendrick, C. (1988) `Roles and Gender in Relationships', in S.W. Duck (ed.) Handbook of Personal Relationships: Theory, Research, and Interventions. Chichester: Wiley.

Ho, D.Y.F. (1986) `Chinese Patterns of Socialization: A Critical Review', in M.H. Bond (ed.) The Psychology of the Chinese People. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

Hoyle, R.H. (1987) `Factorial Validity of the Multifaceted Evaluation-of-Self Inventory (MESI)', paper presented at the 27th Annual Meeting of the New England Psychological Association, Amherst, MA.

Hsu, F.L.K. (1981) Americans and Chinese: Passage to Differences, 3rd edn. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

10.

Johnson, M.P. (1991) `Commitment to Personal Relationships', in W.H. Jones & D.W. Perlman (eds) Advances in Personal Relationships, Vol. 3. London: Jessica Kingsley.

11.

Levinger, G. (1979) `A Social Exchange View on the Dissolution of Pair Relationships', in R.L. Burgess & T.L. Huston (eds) Social Exchange in Developing Relationships. New York: Academic Press.

12.

Rusbult, C.E. (1980) `Satisfaction and Commitment in Friendships', Representative Research in Social Psychology 11: 96-105.

13.

Rusbult, C.E. (1983) `A Longitudinal Test of the Investment Model: The Development (and Deterioration) of Satisfaction and Commitment in Heterosexual Involvements', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45: 101-117.

14.

Rusbult, C.E. & Buunk, A.P. (1993) `Commitment Processes in Close Relationships: An Interdependence Analysis', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 10: 175-204.

15.

Rusbult, C.E. , Verette, J. , Whitney, G.A. , Slovik, L.F. & Lipkus, I. (1991) `Accommodation Processes in Close Relationships: Theory and Preliminary Empirical Evidence', Journal of Personalty and Social Psychology 60: 53-78.

16.

Wallach, M.A. & Wallach, L. (1983) Psychology's Sanction for Selfishness: The Error of Egoism in Theory and Therapy. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

17.

Yum, J.O. (1988). `The Impact of Confucianism on Interpersonal Relationships and Communication Patterns in East Asia', Communication Monographs 55: 374-388.