This study examined two types of classroom assessment events, the more closed convergent assessments (CA) versus the more open-ended divergent assessments (DA), to see if they influence learners differently in terms of motivation and learning strategies. Participants were 105 college freshmen in Taiwan with the same instructor placed under one listening and two speaking classes. In these intact groups, each student experienced two types of assessment, a more traditional test (the CA) and a group performance assessment (the DA). Immediately after they experienced each assessment event, participants reported on their task-specific motivation and learning strategies. Results indicated that CAs were better received by high self-efficacious students and DAs by low scorers. After controlling for self-efficacy, a comparison revealed that students reacted differently in the listening and speaking classes. More specifically, in speaking student motivation and strategy were higher for the DA than for the CA, whereas in the listening class the pattern was reversed. Local educational culture and the nature of assessment events are then discussed.
Adair-Hauck, B., Glisan, E.W., Koda, K., Swender, E.B., & Sandrock, P. ( 2006). The Integrated Performance Assessment (IPA): Connecting assessment to instruction and learning. Foreign Language Annals , 39, 359-382.
2.
Ames, C. ( 1992). Classrooms, goals, structures and student motivation . Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 267-271.
3.
Bandura, A. ( 1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change . Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
4.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. ( 2003). Assessment for learning - Putting it into practice . Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
5.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. ( 2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, September, 9-21.
6.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. ( 1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment, Phi Delta Kappan, October, 139-148.
7.
Brookhart, S.M. ( 1997). A theoretical framework for the role of classroom assessment in motivating student effort and achievement. Applied Measurement in Education, 10(2), 161-180.
8.
Brookhart, S.M. ( 1998). Determinants of student effort on schoolwork and school-based achievement. The Journal of Educational Research , 91, 201-208.
9.
Brookhart, S.M., & DeVoge, J.G. (1999). Testing a theory about the role of classroom assessment in student motivation and achievement. Applied Measurement in Education, 12(4), 409-425.
10.
Brookhart, S.M., & Durkin, D.T. ( 2003). Classroom assessment, student motivation, and achievement in high school social studies classes. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(1), 27-54.
11.
Brookhart, S.M., Walsh, J.M., & Zientarski, W.A. (2006). The dynamics of motivation and effort for classroom assessments in middle school science and social studies . Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 151-184.
12.
Butler, Y.G. ( 2009). How do teachers observe and evaluate elementary school students’ foreign language performance? A case study from South Korea . TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 417-444.
13.
Carless, D. ( 2007). Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 44(1), 57-66.
Cheng, L., Rogers, T., & Hu, H. ( 2004). ESL/EFL instructors’ classroom assessment practices: Purposes, methods, and procedures. Language Testing, 21, 360-389.
16.
Chen, J.F., Warden, C.A., & Chang, H.-T. ( 2005). Motivators that do not motivate: The case of Chinese EFL learners and the influence of culture on motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 609-633.
17.
Connor-Greene, P.A. ( 2000). Assessing and promoting student learning: Blurring the line between teaching and testing. Teaching of Psychology , 27(2), 84-88.
18.
Cumming, A. ( 2009). Language assessment in education: Tests, curricula, and teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 90-100.
19.
Davison, C., & Leung, C. ( 2009). Current issues in English language teacher-based assessment . TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 393-415.
20.
Dörnyei, Z. ( 1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom . Modern Language Journal, 78, 273-284.
21.
Dörnyei, Z. ( 2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
22.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ottó, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 4, 43-69.
23.
Duncan, T.G., & McKeachie, W.J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist , 40(2), 117-128.
24.
Fox, J. ( 2004). Biasing for the best in language testing and learning: An interview with Merrill Swain. Language Assessment Quarterly , 1(4), 235-251.
25.
Gardner, R.C. ( 1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
26.
Hamp-Lyons, L. ( 2009). Principles for large-scale classroom-based teacher assessment of English learners’ language: An initial framework from school-based assessment in Hong Kong. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 524-529.
27.
Harlen, W., & Winter, J. ( 2004). The development of assessment for learning: Learning from the case of science and mathematics. Language Testing , 21, 390-408.
28.
Huang, S.-C. (forthcoming). Pushing learners to work through tests and marks: Motivating or demotivating? - A case in a Taiwanese university. Language Assessment Quarterly .
29.
Lantolf, J.P., & Poehner, M.E. ( 2004). Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future . Journal of Applied Linguistics, 49-74.
30.
Leung, C. ( 2004). Developing formative teacher assessment: Knowledge, practice, and change. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(1), 19-41.
31.
Leung, C. ( 2007). Dynamic assessment: Assessment for and as teaching ? Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(3), 257-278.
32.
McNamara, T. ( 2001). Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research. Language Testing, 18(4), 333-349.
33.
Oxford, R.L. ( 1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House .
34.
Pintrich, P.R. ( 2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686.
35.
Poehner, M.E. ( 2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. The Modern Language Journal , 91(3), 323-340.
36.
Poehner, M., & Lantolf, J. ( 2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9, 233-265.
37.
Rea-Dickins, P., & Gardner, S. ( 2000). Snares and silver bullets: Disentangling the construct of formative assessment. Language Testing, 17, 215-243.
38.
Ricardo-Osorio, J.G. ( 2008). A study of foreign language learning outcomes assessment in U.S. undergraduate education. Foreign Language Annals, 41(4), 590-610.
39.
Robbins, S.B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., & Langley, R. ( 2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin , 130(2), 261-288.
40.
Spence-Brown, R. ( 2001). The eye of the beholder: Authenticity in an embedded assessment task. Language Testing, 18(4), 463-481.
41.
Stefanou, C., & Parkes, J. ( 2003). Effects of classroom assessment on student motivation in fifth-grade science. The Journal of Educational Research , 96(3), 152-162.
42.
Teasdale, A., & Leung, C. ( 2000). Teacher assessment and psychometric theory: A case of paradigm crossing? Language Testing, 17(2), 163-184.
43.
Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. ( 2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 615-631.
44.
Tseng, W.-T., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. ( 2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics , 27(1), 78-102.
45.
Vygotsky, L. ( 1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
46.
Warden, C.A., & Lin, H.J. ( 2000). Existence of integrative motivation in an Asian EFL setting . Foreign Language Annals, 33, 535-547.
47.
Xu, Y., & Liu, Y. ( 2009). Teacher assessment knowledge and practice: A narrative inquiry of a Chinese college EFL teacher’s experience. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 493-513.
48.
Yin, Y., Shavelson, R.J., Ayala, C.C., Ruiz-Primo, M.A., Brandon, P.R., Furtak, E.M. et al. (2008). On the impact of formative assessment on student motivation, achievement and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 335-359.
49.
Zimmerman, B.J. ( 1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.) Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202-231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
