The association between perceived density in minimum apartments and spatial openness index three-dimensional visual analysis

Abstract

Small apartments exist in dense cities worldwide. Developing adequate quality small apartments in city centres would strongly attract current demand. Analysis, predictive tools and design concepts regulated for better interior design and lower perceived density would provide residential environments with happier tenants. This research evaluates perceived density and visual privacy in alternative minimum apartments based on the spatial openness index three-dimensional visibility analysis, i.e. their accumulated three-dimensional visibility calculations. The compatibility of the spatial openness index concept as predicting perceived density in minimum apartments was examined and assessed. An empirical study was conducted using a virtual reality experiment in a controlled environment – An immersive three-dimensional visualisation laboratory¹, with more than 100 subjects participated in the experiment. Significant relations were found between perceived density and visual privacy for all apartments (single and double story). The measured volume of visible space from the door viewpoint (the entrance to minimum apartments) and the perceived density evaluated there by participants, and a general evaluation for the apartment are strongly related for both (single and double story groups). Strong correlation was found between visibility measurements from the door and the ‘visual privacy’ at the sofa/bed. According to assessment results the spatial openness index three-dimensional visibility analysis can predict the perceived density of minimum apartments.

Keywords

Three-dimensional visual analysis built environment perception immersive virtual environments visualisation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bardhan

Kurisu

Hanaki

(2015) Does compact urban forms relate to good quality of life in high density cities of India? Case of Kolkata. Cities 48: 55–65.

Batty

(2001) Exploring Isovist fields: Space and shape in architectural and urban morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28: 123–150.

Batty

(2004) A new theory of space syntax. Syntax 44(0): 36.

Benedikt ML (1979) To take hold of space: Isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 6: 47–65.

Bhatia S, Stephan KC and Michael JO (2012) Analyzing architectural space: identifying salient regions by computing 3d isovists. In: Conference Proceedings. 46th Annual Conference of the Architectural Science Association (AN-ZAScA), Gold Coast, QLD.

Borukhov

(1978) Trade-off between density and other objectives: A re-examination of planning norms. GeoJournal 2: 71–80.

Carmiel O (2010) Manhattan to get first ‘micro-unit’ apartment building’. Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-01-22/new-york-city-to-get-first-micro-unit-apartment-building (accessed 22 January 2013).

Cheng

(2010a) Human Perception of Urban Density, University of Cambridge (UK) ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing.

Cheng

(2010b) Understanding density and high density. In: Ng

(ed.) Designing High-Density Cities for Social and Environmental Sustainability, London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan, 2010, pp. 3–16.

10.

Churchman

(1999) Disentangling the concept of density. Journal of Planning Literature 13(4): 389–411.

11.

12.

Evans

Lepore

Schroeder

(1996) The role of interior design elements in human responses to crowding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(1): 41–46.

13.

Fisher-Gewirtzman

(2014) 3D LOS visibility analysis model: Quantitative/qualitative aspects in urban environments. In: Lee

(eds) Chapter 14 in Geodesign by Integrating Design and Geospatial Sciences, GeoJournal Library 111. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

14.

Fisher-Gewirtzman D, Lee DJ, Diaz E, et al. (2015) Is perception quantifiable? Combining measurements of space with quality of the view. In: Third annual international conference on Architecture and Civil Engineering (ACE 2015), Singapore, 13–14 April 2015.

15.

Fisher-Gewirtzman

(2015) The impact of interior configurations on the perceived density in minimum apartments. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research.

16.

Fisher-Gewirtzman

Burt

Tzamir

(2003) A 3-D visual method for comparative evaluation of dense built-up environments. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30: 575–587.

17.

Fisher-Gewirtzman

Natapov

(2014) Different approaches of visibility analyses applied on a hilly urban environment. Survey Review 46(338): 366–382.

18.

Fisher-Gewirtzman

Shach-Pinsly

Wagner

(2006) Urban coastal environments: Quantitative methods for visual analysis and comparative evaluation. Urban Design International 10: 23–37.

19.

Fisher-Gewirtzman

Shashkov

Doytsher

(2013) Voxel based volumetric visibility analysis of urban environments. Survey Review 45(333): 451–461.

20.

Fisher-Gewirtzman

Wagner

(2003) Spatial openness as a practical metric for evaluating built-up environments. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30: 37–49.

21.

Gifford

(2007) The consequences of living in high-rise buildings. Architecture Science Review 50(1): 2–17.

22.

Hillier B and Hanson J (1984) The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

23.

Hillier B (1999) The hidden geometry of deformed grids: or, why space syntax works, when it looks as though it shouldn't. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 26: 169–191.

24.

Jacobs

Appleyard

(1987) Towards an urban design manifest. Journal of the American Planning Association 53: 1112–1120.

25.

Kultsova

Tuncer

Schmitt

(2013) Visibility analysis for 3D urban environments. Research development and practical application. Models of Computation: Human Factors 2 – Computation and Performance – eCAADe 375–383.

26.

Moore T (2013) Living (not so) large! Mayor Bloomberg reveals winning design for micro-mini apartments. New York Daily News. Available at: http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/real-estate/living-not-large-article-1.1244903 (accessed 22 January 2013).

27.

Morello

Ratti

(2009) A digital image of the city: 3-D isovists in Lynch’s urban analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36: 46–83.

28.

Rapoport

(1975) Towards a definition of density. Environment and Behavior 7: 133–158.

29.

Schiffenbauer

Brown

Perry

(1977) The relationship between density and crowding. Some architectural modifiers. Environment and Behavior 9: 1.

30.

Sivam

Karuppannan

Davis Michael

(2012) Stakeholders’ perception of residential density: A case study of Adelaide, Australia. Journal of House and the Built Environment 27: 473–494.

31.

Tandy CRV (1967) The isovist method of landscape survey. In: Murray A (ed.) Symposium: Methods of Landscape Analysis, May 1967, pp.9–10. London, England: Landscape Research Group.

32.

Turner A, Doxa M, O'Sullivan D and Penn A (2001) From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28(1): 103–121.

33.

Wasim

Thierry

Eric

(2013) A new algorithm for 3D Isovists. Advances in Spatial Data Handling. Advances in Geographic Information Sciences, Springer, pp. 157–173.

34.

Weiner

Franz

(2005) Isovist as a means to predict spatial experience and behavior. In: Freksa

Knauff

Krieg-Brückner

(eds) Spatial Cognition IV. Reasoning, Action, Interaction Vol. 3343, Berlin: Springer, pp. 42–57.