How and when do entrepreneurial stressors shape strategic action? Integrating Dual Information Processing Theory with the entrepreneurial Job Demands-Resources model, we advance a “stressor-as-information” perspective to develop an integrated moderated mediation framework in which entrepreneurial stressors indirectly influence strategic entrepreneurial behaviors via strategic decision comprehensiveness, with work engagement and firm performance serving as key boundary conditions. Using multi-informant, multi-wave survey data from 283 entrepreneurs and their co-founders, we find support for the proposed model. While acknowledging that cognitive processes are inferred through behavioral manifestations, our findings suggest that moving beyond purely motivational accounts of entrepreneurial stress can enrich understanding of how and when the pressures inherent to entrepreneurship translate into strategic processes and offer new insights into the micro-foundations of strategic entrepreneurship.
AllenJSStevensonRMO’BoyleEH, et al. (2021) What matters more for entrepreneurship success? A meta-analysis comparing general mental ability and emotional intelligence in entrepreneurial settings. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal15(3): 352–376.
2.
Atuahene-GimaKLiH (2004) Strategic decision comprehensiveness and new product development outcomes in new technology ventures. Academy of Management Journal47(4): 583–597.
3.
AmatoCBaronRABarbieriB, et al. (2017) Regulatory modes and entrepreneurship: The mediational role of alertness in small business success. Journal of Small Business Management 55(S1): 27–42.
BakkerABDemeroutiESanz-VergelAI (2014) Burnout and work engagement: The JD-R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behaviour1: 389–411.
7.
BreugstNPatzeltHShepherdDA (2020) When is effort contagious in new venture management teams? Understanding the contingencies of social motivation theory. Journal of Management Studies57(8): 1556–1588.
8.
CabantousLGondJP (2011) Rational decision making as performative praxis: Explaining rationality’s éternel retour. Organization Science22(3): 573–589.
9.
CardonMSPatelPC (2015) Is stress worth it? Stress-related health and wealth trade-offs for entrepreneurs. Applied Psychology64(2): 379–420.
10.
ChenSChaikenS (1999) The heuristic-systemic model in its broader context. In: ChaikenSTropeY (eds) Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. The Guilford Press, pp.73–96.
11.
CollewaertVFassinY (2013) Conflicts between entrepreneurs and investors: The impact of perceived unethical behavior. Small Business Economics40(3): 635–649.
12.
CostaNFerreiraJJJayantilalS (2023) Strategic entrepreneurship: Mapping the field and charting a path for future research. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation27: 111–141.
13.
CovinJGWalesWJ (2019) Crafting high-impact entrepreneurial orientation research: Some suggested guidelines. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice43(1): 3–18.
14.
De CockRDenooLClarysseB (2020) Surviving the emotional rollercoaster called entrepreneurship: The role of emotion regulation. Journal of Business Venturing35(2): 105936.
15.
DijkhuizenJGorgievskiMvan VeldhovenM, et al. (2016) Feeling successful as an entrepreneur: A job demands-resources approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal12(2): 555–573.
16.
EngelenANeumannCSchwensC (2015) “Of course, I can”: The effect of CEO overconfidence on entrepreneurially oriented firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice39(5): 1137–1160.
17.
EvansJStanovichKE (2013) Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science8(3): 223–241.
18.
FlammerCBansalP (2017) Does a long-term orientation create value? Evidence from a regression discontinuity. Strategic Management Journal38(9): 1827–1847.
19.
ForbesDP (2007) Reconsidering the strategic implications of decision comprehensiveness. Academy of Management Review32(2): 361–376.
20.
FriedmanYCarmeliATishlerA (2016) How CEOs and TMTs build adaptive capacity in small entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management Studies53(6): 996–1018.
21.
HayesAFPreacherKJMeyersTA (2011) Mediation in the estimation of indirect effects in political communication research. In: BucyEPHolbertRL (eds) Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures and Analytical Techniques. Routledge, pp.434–465.
22.
HillADJohnsonSGGrecoLM, et al. (2021) Endogeneity: A review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro and macro research. Journal of Management47(1): 105–143.
23.
IrelandRDHittMASirmonDG (2003) A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management29(6): 963.
24.
IrelandRDWithersMCHarrisonJS, et al. (2023) Strategic entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice47(2): 495–523.
25.
JansenJJPVeraDCrossanM (2009) Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. The Leadership Quarterly20(1): 5–18.
26.
JinLMadisonKKraiczyND, et al. (2017) Entrepreneurial team composition characteristics and new venture performance: A meta analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice41(5): 743–771.
27.
KammerlanderNBurgerDFustA, et al. (2015) Exploration and exploitation in established small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of CEOs’ regulatory focus. Journal of Business Venturing30(4): 582–602.
28.
KickulJGundryLKBarbosaSD, et al. (2009) Intuition versus analysis? Testing differential models of cognitive style on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and the new venture creation process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice33(2): 439–453.
29.
KollmannTStöckmannCKensbockJM (2019) I can’t get no sleep: The differential impact of entrepreneurial stressors on work-home interference and insomnia among experienced versus novice entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing34(4): 692–708.
30.
KraftPSGuntherCKammerlanderNH, et al. (2022) Overconfidence and entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of different types of overconfidence in the entrepreneurial process, Journal of Business Venturing37(4): 106207.
31.
KuratkoDFFisherGAudretschDB (2021) Unraveling the entrepreneurial mindset. Small Business Economics57(4): 1681–1691.
32.
LechatTTorresO (2017) Stressors and satisfactors in entrepreneurial activity: An event-based, mixed methods study predicting small business owners’ health. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business32(4): 537–569.
33.
LermanMPMunyonTPWilliamsDW (2021) The (not so) dark side of entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of the well-being and performance consequences of entrepreneurial stress. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal15(3): 377–402.
34.
LePineJAPodsakoffNPLePineMA (2005) A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal48(5): 764–775.
35.
LingYSimsekZLubatkinM, et al. (2008) Transformational leadership’s role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: Examining the CEO-TMT interface. Academy of Management Journal51(3): 557–576.
36.
LiuSYuXZhangW, et al. (2026) The lifespan of small and medium-sized enterprises in China: Stylized facts and influencing factors. China Economic Review95: 102637.
37.
LubatkinMHSimsekZLingY, et al. (2006) Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team Behaviour al integration. Journal of Management32(5): 646–672.
38.
MazzeiMJ (2018) Strategic entrepreneurship: Content, process, context, and outcomes. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal14: 657–670.
39.
MacKenzieSBPodsakoffPMPodsakoffNP (2011) Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behaviour al research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly35(2): 293–334.
40.
McMullenJSShepherdDA (2006) Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review31(1): 132–152.
41.
MillerCC (2008) Decisional comprehensiveness and firm performance: Towards a more complete understanding. Journal of Behaviour al Decision Making21(5): 598–620.
42.
NikolaevBNLermanMPBoudreauxCJ, et al. (2023) Self-employment and eudaimonic well-being: The mediating role of problem- and emotion-focused coping. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice47(6): 2121–2154.
43.
ObschonkaMPavezIKautonenT, et al. (2023) Job burnout and work engagement in entrepreneurs: How the psychological utility of entrepreneurship drives healthy engagement. Journal of Business Venturing38: 106272.
44.
PodsakoffPNFreiburgerKJPodsakoffPM, et al. (2023) Laying the foundation for the challenge-hindrance stressor framework 2.0. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behaviour10: 165–99.
45.
PreacherKJSeligJP (2012) Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures6(2); 77–98.
46.
RattenV (2023) Entrepreneurship: Definitions, opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Global Business and Organizational Excellence42(5): 79–90.
47.
RauchAFinkMHatakI (2018) Stress processes: An essential ingredient in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Perspective32(3): 340–357.
48.
ReinaCSPetersonSJZhangZ (2017) Adverse effects of CEO family-to-work conflict on firm performance. Organization Science28(2): 228–243.
49.
SambaCTabeshPThanosIC, et al. (2021) Method in the madness? A meta-analysis on the strategic implications of decision comprehensiveness. Strategic Organization19(3): 414–440.
50.
SchaufeliWBBakkerABSalanovaM (2006) The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement66(4): 701–716.
51.
SchmittARosingKZhangSX, et al. (2018) A dynamic model of entrepreneurial uncertainty and business opportunity identification: Exploration as a mediator and entrepreneurial self-efficacy as a moderator. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice42(6): 835–859.
52.
ShepherdNGRuddJM (2014) The influence of context on the strategic decision-making process: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews16(1): 340–364.
StephanU (2018) Entrepreneurs’ mental health and well-being: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Perspectives32(3): 290–322.
55.
TalaulicarTGrundeiJWerderA (2005) Strategic decision making in start-ups: The effect of top management team organization and processes on speed and comprehensiveness. Journal of Business Venturing20(4): 519–541.
56.
TangJTangZCowdenBJ (2017) Exploring the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, CEO dual values, and SME performance in State-owned vs. Nonstate-owned enterprises in China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice41(6): 883–908.
57.
WalesWJKrausSFilserM, et al. (2021) The status quo of research on entrepreneurial orientation: Conversational landmarks and theoretical scaffolding. Journal of Business Research128: 564–577.
58.
WelterFBakerTAudretschDB, et al. (2017) Everyday entrepreneurship—A call for entrepreneurship research to embrace entrepreneurial diversity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice41(3): 311–321.
59.
WenkeKZapkauFBSchwensC (2021) Too small to do it all? A meta-analysis on the relative relationships of exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity with SMEs performance. Journal of Business Research132: 653–665.
60.
WiklundJShepherdDA (2003) Aspiring for and achieving growth: The moderating role of resources and opportunities. Journal of Management Studies40(8): 1919–1941.
61.
XuFKellermannFJinL, et al. (2020) Family support as social exchange entrepreneurship: Its moderating impact on entrepreneurial stressors-well-being relationships. Journal of Business Research120: 59–73.
62.
XuFHeXYangX (2021) A multilevel approach linking entrepreneurial contexts to s subjective well-being: Evidence from rural Chinese entrepreneurs. Journal of Happiness Studies22: 1537–1561.
63.
XuFKellermannsFWJinL (2022) Between-and within-person consequences of daily entrepreneurial stressors on discrete emotions in entrepreneurs: The moderating role of personality. Stress and Health38(3): 568–580.
64.
ZhangSXCuetoJ (2017) The study of bias in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice41(3): 419–454.
65.
ZimmermannAHillSABirkinshawJ, et al. (2019) Complements or substitutes? A microfoundations perspective on the interplay between drivers of ambidexterity in SMEs. Long Range Planning53(6): 101927.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
