Franchise Versus Conventional Small Business Failure Rates in the US and UK: More Similarities than Differences

Abstract

Price and Nicos Zafiris are all members of the International Franchise Research Centre at the University of Westminster, England. At its best, franchising is an avenue into self-employment offered by franchisors (owners of a 'tried and tested' business format) to franchisees (typically aspiring small business men and women), in exchange for payment of a once-off front-end fee followed by an on-going royalty. Based on the principle of 'cloning' success, a principal tenet of the franchise fraternity is that franchise failure rates are low. From the viewpoint of small business researchers, franchising has been argued to be of particular importance, since most franchisors still are, or recently have been, small businesses themselves and most of their royalty-paying franchisees are also small businesses. Thus, in principle, franchising offers a route to growth for the would-be franchisor and small businesses opportunities with limited risk for would-be franchisees. Debates on franchise failure rates, compared with conventional business failure rates, have historically been dogged by problems of definition and measurement. However, recent developments have improved the situation here and what emerges is a striking similarity of failure rates between the two forms of (usually) small business - franchised and non-franchised.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bates, T. (1995), 'Analysis of Survival Rates Among Franchise and Independent Small Business Startups', Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp26-36.

British Franchise Association (1996), Director-General's address accompanying Birmingham (England) National Franchise Exhibition, Franchise '96, London.

Castrogiovanni, G. , Justis, R. , and Julian, S. (1993), 'Franchisee Failure Rates: An Assessment of Magnitude and Influencing Factors', Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp105-115.

Cross, J. (1994), 'Franchising Failures: Definitional and Measurement Issues'. Proceedings of the 8th conJerence of the Society of Franchising, Nevada, USA.

Daly, M. (1987), 'Lifespan of Businesses Registered for VAT', British Business, 3 April, pp28-29.

Daly, M. , and McCann, A. (1992), 'How Many Small Firms?', Employment Gazette, February.

Ellingham, T. (1996), 'Financial Aspects of Launching a Franchise', Franchise World Directory, Franchise World Publications, London, pp79-84.

English, W. , and Willems, J. (1994). 'Franchise vs. Non-Franchise Restaurant Attrition: Year four of a Yellow Pages Longitudinal Analysis', Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the Society of Franchising, Nevada, USA.

Franchising and Expanding Your Business, Entrepreneur Magazine Group Business Start-up Guide (1995), California, p 7-7.

10.

Gerber, M. (1996), 'A Startling Finding...', Today's Smart business Owner, pp2-16.

11.

IFA Franchise Educational Foundation (1996), Study of Franchised Unit 7urnover, Washington DC, p 1-1.

12.

Kirby, D. , Waites,J. , and Bagri, J. (1996), Franchising as a Business Development Strategy - A Report for the Department oJ Trade and Industry.

13.

Lafontaine, F , and Shaw, K. (1996), Franchising Growth and Reality in the US Market: Myth and Reality, Research Paper, University of Michigan/Carnegie Mellon University.

14.

Mendelsohn, M. (1985), The Guide to Franchising, Cassell, London, p 13-13.

15.

Mittlestaedt, R. , and Peterson, M. (1980), Franchising and the Financing of Small Business, a paper in the Studies of Small Business Finance series prepared by The Interagency Task Force on Small Business Finance.

16.

Ozanne, U. , and Hunt, S. (1971), The Economic Effects of Franchising, US Select Committee on Small Business, Washington, DC.

17.

Padmanabhan, K. (1986), 'Are the Franchised Businesses Less Risky than the Non-Franchised Businesses?', Proceedings of the Ist conference of the Society of Franchising, Nebraska, USA, pp 28-30.

18.

Phillips, B. , and Kirchhoff, B. (1989), 'Formation, Growth and Survival; Small Firm Dynamics in the US Economy', Small Business Economics, 1, pp65-74.

19.

Price, S. (1996), Behind the Veneer of Success: Propensities for UK Franchisor Failure, Small Business Research Trust, Milton Keynes.

20.

Purdy, D. , Stanworth,J. , and Hatcliffe, M. (1996), Franchising in Figures, University of Westminster, London.

21.

Shane, S. (1996a), 'Hybrid Organisational Arrangements Add Their Implications for Firm Growth and Survival: A Study of New Franchisors', Academy of Management Journal, 39, pp216-234.

22.

Shane, S. (1996b), Differences Between Successful and Unsuccessful Franchisors, report produced for the Office of Advocacy, US Small Business Administration, cited in The Info Franchise Newsletter,January, p 1-1.

23.

Stanworth, J. (1994), The Impact of Franchising on the Development Prospects of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) in the United Kingdom, Report prepared for the UK Department of Trade and Industry, March.

24.

Silvester, T. , Stanworth,J. , Purdy, D. , and Hatcliffe, M. (1996), Secrets of Success, Vol. 1, No. 3, Lloyds Bank plc/International Franchise Research Centre, University of Westminster, London.

25.

Storey, D. (1994), Understanding the Small Business Sector, Routledge, London and New York, pp78-110.

26.

Trutko,J. , Trutko,J. , and Kostecka, A. (1993), Franchising's Growing Role in the US Economy, 1975-2000, US Small Business Administration, Washington, DC.

27.

Williams, D. (1994), 'A Comparison of Business Discontinuations in States With and Without Franchise Termination Laws', Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the Society of Franchising, Nevada.