Building for Business Knowledge: Constructing a New Business School in the Heart of London

Abstract

An account is given of the planning and construction of the new award-winning building to house the Cass Business School, City of London (formerly the Business School of City University), opened in May 2003, from the viewpoint of the way in which considerations of information and knowledge management permeated the fundamental concept of the building as well as its detailed design features. A major aim of the building was that it should serve as: a world class place for staff, students and visitors to create and share knowledge; a comfortable, efficient and sustainable building; a visible symbol of the organization’s goal to be the intellectual hub of the City of London; a building that helps staff to achieve cultural change internally by breaking down barriers between departments and between different types of staff; and a flexible building capable of being adapted to changing models of learning/teaching or changing economic circumstances. Three additional concepts emerged from the design process: that it should be the intellectual hub of the City of London; that it should combine the very best of technology with a great diversity of opportunities for face-to-face interaction; and that there should be full commercial flexibility. Concludes that the design process benefited greatly from innovative work by researchers, architects, universities and other organizations worldwide that are concerned with knowledge work. The outcome was an acceptance that there is no one right way to design a modern university but each organization needs to carry out its own strategic review to decide what it wants the building to achieve, before there can be any consideration of detailed design work.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Christopher Alexander, Sara Ishikawa and Murray Silver-stein (1977). A Pattern Language. Towns, Buildings, Construction. London: Oxford University Press .

R Alexander, J Willcocks and K Kinder (1989). Changing Primary Practice. Basingstoke: Falmer Press .

Tony Birks (1972). Building the New Universities. Newton Abbot: David and Charles .

Will Callaghan (1999). ‘Building for the Future’. Guardian 29 June 1999 p 9.

Chris Comber and Debbie Wall (2001). ‘The classroom environment: a framework for learning’. In C Paechter, R Edwardset al (eds), Learning, Space and Identity pp 87-101. London: Paul Chapman Publishing .

Giovanna Damiani (1997). San Marco Florence: The Museum and its Art. London: Philip Wilson .

Cynthia C Davidson (ed) (1996). Eleven Authors in Search of a Building: the Aranoff Center for Design and Art at the University of Cincinnati. New York: The Monacelli Press .

Judith Doyle and Max Nathan (2002). The State of the Office. London: The Work Foundation .

Frank Duffy (1998). ‘Managing a Miracle’ . RIBA Journal Oct 1998 p 41 .

10.

Brian Edwards (2000). University Architecture. London: Spon Press .

11.

Isabelle Gournay (1990). Ernest Cormier et l’Université de Montréal. Montreal: Canadian Centre for Architecture .

12.

N Hastings and J Schweiso (1995). ‘Tasks and tables: the effects of seating arrangements on task engagement in primary classrooms’ . Educational Research 37(3) pp 279-291 .

13.

Higher Education Statistics Agency (2001). Higher Education Statistics for the United Kingdom 1999/2000. Cheltenham: HESA .

14.

Ivan Illich (1985). Tools for Conviviality. London Marion Boyars .

15.

Bruce Jilk and George Copa (2001). ‘Knowledge reintegration: emerging paradigm, designs for learning, and supporting environment’ . 8th International EDINEB Conference, Nice, 20-22nd June 2001.

16.

Will Manley (1999). ‘Keeping up with the times: library architecture should emphasize form over function’ . American Libraries 8(30), 1 September 1999 p 144 .

17.

John McKean (1998). Charles Rennie Mackintosh: pocket guide. Grantown-on-Spey: Colin Baxter Photography .

18.

Jeremy Myerson, and Phillip Ross (1999). The Creative Office. London: Laurence King Publishing .

19.

Jeremy Myerson and Phillip Ross (2003). The Twenty-First Century Office. London: Laurence King Publishing .

20.

Carrie Paechter, Richard Edwards, Roger Harrison and Peter Twining (2001). Learning, space and identity. London: Paul Chapman in association with the Open University .

21.

Gordon Pask (1976). Conversation theory: applications in education and epistemology. Amsterdam: Elsevier .

22.

Nikolaus Pevsner (1976). A history of building types. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .

23.

Henry Sanoff (1994). School design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold .

24.

Magnolia Scudieri (1995). San Marco: complete guide to the museum and church. Florence Scala Becocci .

25.

Abigail J Sellen and Richard H R Harper, (2002). The myth of the paperless office. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

26.

Keith Spence (1984). Cathedrals and abbeys of England and Wales. London: Ernest Benn Ltd.

27.

Whitney S Stoddard (1966). Monastery and cathedral in France. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press .

28.

Godfrey Thompson (1989). Planning and design of library buildings. Oxford: Butterworth Architecture .

29.

Paul V Turner (1984). Campus: an American planning tradition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press and Architectural History Foundation .

30.

H van Brunt (1886). ‘On the present condition and prospects of architecture’ . The Atlantic Monthly. 57(341), March 1886.

31.

Carol Simon Weinstein and Thomas G David (eds) (1987). Spaces for children: the built environment and child development. New York: Plenum Press .

32.

Geoffrey N Wright (1998). Discovering abbeys and priories, 3rd ed. Princes Risborough: Shire Publications Ltd.