Considers how the role of the librarian in the research library has changed during the past century and asks how it needs to develop to meet the demands of the next century. Identifies seven roles performed by research librarians at various stages: the scholar librarian; the librarian-service provider; the librarian-manager; the librarian-project manager; the librarian-researcher; the librarian-publisher and distributor; and the boundary-crossing librarian. Concludes that there is a need to re-conceptualise the role of the librarian and the research library itself.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Eco, Umberto. ‘Fragments’ Misreadings. London, Picador, 1994. ISBN 0-330-33468-9. pp. 15–26.
2.
2. Buckland, Michael. Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 42, no. 5, June 1991. 351–360.
3.
3. Johnson, Lesley. ‘As housewives we are worms’: women, modernity and the home question. Cultural Studies, vol. 10, no. 3, October 1996. 449–463.
4.
4. Pymm, Bob. Barbie, Batman, Beatles: do they figure in your selection policy?Australian Library Journal, vol. 40, no. 1, February 1991. 27–34.
5.
5. Farradane, Jason. Knowledge, information and information science. Journal of Information Science, vol. 2, no. 2, September 1980. 75–80.
6.
6. Searing, Susan. Meeting the information needs of interdisciplinary scholars: issues for administrators of large university libraries. Library Trends, vol. 45, no. 2, Fall 1996. 315–342.
7.
7. Dervin, B.Useful theory for librarianship: communication, not information. Drexel Library Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, July 1977. 16–32.
8.
8. Martyn, John. Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 9, 1974. 3–24.
9.
9. http://www.nla.gov.au/collect.
10.
10.Ward, J. A.Measurement management: what you measure is what you get. Information Systems Management, vol. 13, no. 1, Winter 1996. 59–61.
11.
11. Kovel-Jarboe, P.Quality improvement: a strategy for planned organisational change. Library Trends, vol. 44, no. 3, Winter 1996. 605–630.
12.
12. McGregor, F.Quality assessment: combatting complacency. Australian Library Journal, vol. 46, no. 1, February 1997. 82–92.
13.
13. Hernon, Peter and Schwartz, Candy. Editorial: ‘Wash and Wear’ research: unrealistic expectations. Library and Information Science Research, vol. 18, no. 1, 1996. 1–2.
14.
14. Joint Funding Councils’ Libraries Review Group, Report (Chairman: Professor Sir Brian Follett). The Councils, Bristol, December 1993.
15.
15. Corrall, Sheila. Academic libraries in the information society. New Library World, vol. 96, no. 1120, 1995. 35–42.
16.
16. Line, Maurice B.Problems in the availability of some social science publications. Interlending and Document Supply, vol. 11, no. 1, January 1983. 3–6.
17.
17. Peters, Paul Evan. Birds in a cage for the information age: positioning libraries to manage the electronic record. In: Dempsey, Lorcan; Law, Derek; Mowat, Ian, eds. Networking and the future of libraries 2: managing the intellectual record: an international conference held at the University of Bath. London: Library Association Publishing, 1995. 212–212 p. ISBN 1856041581.
18.
18. Palmer, Carole. Information work at the boundaries of science: linking library services to research practices. Library Trends, vol. 45, no. 2, Fall 1996. 165–191.