This article explores citizens' political information seeking, which constitutes the `demand side' of political communication during election campaigns. In order to look into what motivates a voter to seek political information, the article formulates a model drawing on ideas from the uses and gratifications tradition, the rational choice framework and the seminal studies of the Columbia and Michigan schools of electoral research. Among the determinants of political information seeking investigated are: social expectations to be politically informed; a personal duty to stay politically informed; a desire to express one's political orientations through voting; and the entertainment aspect of politics. Regarding the dependent variable of campaign information seeking, its overall intensity and the particular sources used (e.g. newspaper, television and radio reports, party political broadcasts, bulletin boards) to gain this information are examined. The article analyses a study of a local German election, which contains a wide variety of measures suitable to test our hypotheses. The empirical analysis shows that campaign information seeking can be explained fairly well (R2 up to ≈ 22 percent). Among the determinants, social expectations to be politically informed exerted the greatest influence in our model. The influence of the determinants on the specific information sources varies substantially across the different sources. Therefore, explaining the decision to seek particular information sources during an election campaign demands the general model be more specialized.
Aldrich, John H.
(1993) `Rational Choice and Turnout', American Journal of Political Science37(1): 246-278.
2.
Andress, Hans-J.
, Jacques A. Hagenaars and Steffen M. Kühnel (1997) Analyse von Tabellen und kategorialen Daten. Log-lineare Modelle, latente Klassenanalyse, logistische Regression und GSK-Ansatz. Berlin: Springer.
3.
Berelson, Bernard R.
, Paul F. Lazarsfeld and William N. McPhee (1954) Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.
4.
Blumler, Jay G.
(1980) `The Role of Theory in Uses and Gratifications Studies', pp. 201-228 in G. Cleveland Wilhoit (ed.) and Harold de Bock (assoc. ed.) Mass Communication Review Yearbook. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
Blumler, Jay G.
(1985) `The Social Character of Media Gratifications', pp. 41-59 in Karl Erik Rosengren, Lawrence A. Wenner and Philip Palmgreen (eds) Media Gratifications Research: Current Perspectives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Blumler, Jay G.
and Elihu Katz (eds) (1974) The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Brennan, Geoffrey
and Loren Lomasky (1993) Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Brians, Craig L.
and Martin P. Wattenberg (1996) `Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News, and Newspapers', American Journal of Political Science40(1): 172-193.
9.
Broh, C.A.
(1980) `Horse-Race Journalism: Reporting the Polls in the 1976 Presidential Election', Public Opinion Quarterly44(4): 514-529.
10.
Campbell, Angus
, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller and Donald E. Stokes (1960) The American Voter. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.
11.
Chaffee, Steven H.
, Xinshu Zhao and Glenn Leshner (1994) `Political Knowledge and the Campaign Media of 1992', Communication Research21(3): 305-324.
12.
Dalton, Russell J.
(1984) `Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies', Journal of Politics46(1): 264-284.
13.
Delli Carpini
, Michael X. and Bruce A. Williams (1994) `Methods, Metaphors, and Media Research: The Uses of Television in Political Conversation', Communication Research21(6): 782-812.
14.
Downs, Anthony
(1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
15.
Finkel, Steven E.
(1993) `Reexamining the “Minimal Effects” Model in Recent Presidential Campaigns', Journal of Politics55(1): 1-21.
16.
Garramone, Gina M.
(1985) `Motivation and Political Information Processing: Extending the Gratifications Approach', pp. 201-219 in Sidney Kraus and Richard M. Perloff (eds) Mass Media and Political Thought: An Information-Processing Approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
Holtz-Bacha, Christina
and Lynda L. Kaid (1996) ` “Simply the Best”. Parteienspots im Bundestagswahlkampf 1994 - Inhalte und Rezeption', pp. 177-207 in Christina Holtz-Bacha and Lynda L. Kaid (eds) Wahlen und Wahlkampf in den Medien. Untersuchungen aus dem Wahljahr 1994. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
18.
Kippax, Susan
and John P. Murray (1980) `Using the Mass Media. Need Gratification and Perceived Utility', Communication Research7(3): 335-360.
19.
Lazarsfeld, Paul F.
, Bernard Berelson and Hazel Gaudet (1948) The People's Choice. How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign, 2nd edn.New York and London: Columbia University Press.
20.
Levy, Mark R.
and Sven Windahl (1984) `Audience Activity and Gratifications. A Conceptual Clarification and Exploration', Communication Research11(1): 51-78.
21.
Lowden, Nancy B.
, Peter A. Andersen, David M. Dozier and Martha M. Lauzen (1994) `Media Use in the Primary Election. A Secondary Medium Model', Communication Research21(3): 293-304.
22.
Lull, James
(1980) `Family Communication Patterns and the Social Uses of Television', Communication Research7(3): 319-334.
23.
McCombs, Maxwell
and Paula Poindexter (1983) `The Duty to Keep Informed: News Exposure and Civic Obligation', Journal of Communication33: 88-96.
24.
McCombs, Maxwell E.
and David H. Weaver (1985) `Toward a Merger of Gratifications and Agenda-Setting Research', pp. 95-108 in Karl Erik Rosengren, Lawrence A. Wenner and Philip Palmgreen (eds) Media Gratifications Research: Current Perspectives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
McLeod, Jack M.
and Lee B. Becker (1981) `The Uses and Gratifications Approach', pp. 67-99 in Dan D. Nimmo and Keith R. Sanders (eds) Handbook of Political Communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
McLeod, Jack M.
and Danield G. McDonald (1985) `Beyond Simple Exposure. Media Orientations and their Impact on Political Processes', Communication Research12(1): 3-33.
27.
Nimmo, Dan
and David L. Swanson (1990) `The Field of Political Communication: Beyond the Voter Persuasion Paradigm', pp. 7-47 in David L. Swanson and Dan D. Nimmo (eds) New Directions in Political Communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
Owen, Diana
(1991) Media Messages in American Presidential Elections. New York: Greenwood Press.
29.
Palmgreen, Philip
, Lawrence A. Wenner and Karl E. Rosengren (1985) `Uses and Gratifications Research: The Past Ten Years', pp. 11-37 in Karl Erik Rosengren, Lawrence A. Wenner and Philip Palmgreen (eds) Media Gratifications Research. Current Perspectives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
Perloff, Richard M.
(1985) `Personal Relevance and Campaign Information Seeking: A Cognitive Response-Based Approach', pp. 177-200 in Sidney Kraus and Richard M. Perloff (eds) Mass Media and Political Thought. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
Pettey, Gary R.
(1988) `The Interaction of the Individual's Social Environment, Attention and Interest, and Public Affairs Media Use on Political Knowledge Holding', Communication Research15(3): 265-281.
32.
Popkin, Samuel L.
(1991) The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.
33.
Scherer, Helmut
(1993) `Wähler und Wahlkampf. Die Beobachtung des Wahlkampfs durch die Bürger in Leipzig während des Kommunalwahlkampfs 1990', pp. 208-246 in Christina Holtz-Bacha and Lynda L. Kaid (eds) Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
34.
Swanson, David L.
and Paolo Mancini (eds) (1996) Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and their Consequences. Westport, CT: Praeger.
35.
Weaver, David H.
(1980) `Audience Need for Orientation and Media Effects', Communication Research7(3): 361-376.
36.
Zhao, Xinshu
and Steven H. Chaffee (1995) `Campaign Advertisements Versus Television News as Sources of Political Issue Information', Public Opinion Quarterly59(1): 41-65.
