A B S T R A C T ■ The influence of negative press reports on their subjects was determined by means of a questionnaire answered by 91 persons who had complained about such reports to the Deutsche Presserat (German Press Council). The findings show that negative press reports have long-lasting emotional and social consequences, as perceived by the subjects. Plausible interactions exist between these consequences. There is a theoretical basis for attributing both types of consequences to certain characteristics of the reports. ■
Bruschke, J. and W.E. Loges (1999) `Relationship between Pretrial Publicity and Trial Outcomes', Journal of Communication49(4): 104—20.
2.
Cohen, J., D. Mutz, V. Price and A. Gunther (1988) `Perceived Impact Third-Person Effects', Public Opinion Quarterly52: 161—73.
3.
Cook, F.L., T.R. Tyler, E.G. Goetz, M.T. Gordon, D. Protess, D.R. Leff and H.L. Moltoch (1983) `Media and Agenda Setting: Effects on the Public, Interest Group Leaders, Policy Makers and Policy', Public Opinion Quarterly47(1): 16—35.
4.
Davison, W.P. (1983) `The Third-Person Effect in Communication', Public Opinion Quarterly47: 1—15.
5.
Deutscher Presserat (ed.) (2003) Jahrbuch 2003. Mit der Spruchpraxis des Jahres 2002. Schwerpunkt : Qualität im Journalismus. [Yearbook 2003. The Decisions from 2002. Main Topic: Quality in Journalism]. Konstanz : UVK-Verlags-Gesellschaft.
6.
Dexter, H.R., B.L. Cutler and G. Moran (1992) `A Test of Voir Dire as a Remedy for the Prejudicial Effects of Pretrial Publicity', Journal of Applied Social Psychology22: 819—32.
7.
Esser, F. (1998) Die Kräfte hinter den Schlagzeilen. Englischer und deutscher Journalismus im Vergleich [The Power behind the Headlines: British and German Journalism in Comparison]. Freiburg i. Br.: Verlag Karl Alber.
8.
Esser, F. (1999) `Tabloidization of News: A Comparative Analysis of Anglo-American and German Press Journalism', European Journal of Communication14(1): 291—324.
9.
Garramone, G.M., C.K. Atkin, B.E. Pinkleton and R.T. Cole (1990) `Effects of Negative Political Advertising on the Political Process', Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media34(3): 299—344.
10.
Geiger, T. and A. Steinbach (1996) `Auswirkungen politischer Skandale auf die Karriere der Skandalierten' [Impact of Scandals on the Careers of the People Involved] , pp. 119—33 in O. Jarren, H. Schatz and H. Weßler (eds) Medien und politischer Prozeß. Politische Öffentlichkeit und massenmediale Politikvermittlung im Wandel [Media and Political Process: Public Policy and the Changing Presentation of Politics in the Media]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
11.
Gunther, A. (1991) `What We Think Others Think: Cause and Consequence in the Third-Person Effect', Communication Research18: 355—72.
12.
Heider, F. (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: John Wiley.
13.
Jensen, J.D. and R.J. Hurley (2005) `Third-Person Effects and the Environment: Social Distance, Social Desirability, and Presumed Behavior', Journal of Communication55(2): 242—56.
14.
Jones, E.E. and R.E. Nisbett (1971) The Actor and the Observer: Divergent Perceptions of the Causes of Behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Pr.
15.
Kepplinger, H.M. (2003) `Warum Krisen eskalieren. Über die unterschiedliche Wahrnehmung durch die Beteiligten' [Why Crises Escalate: The Divergent Perspectives of the People Involved], pp. 130—9 in M. Kuhn, G. Kalt and A. Kinter (eds) Chefsache Issues Management [CEOs and Issue Management]. Frankfurt am Main: F.A.Z.-Inst. für Management-, Markt- und Medieninformation.
16.
Kepplinger, H.M. (2007) `Reciprocal Effects: Toward a Theory of Mass Media Effects on Decision Makers', The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12: 3—23.
17.
Kepplinger, H.M. and S. Glaab (2005) `Folgen ungewollter Öffentlichkeit' [The Consequences of Unintentional Publicity], pp. 117—37 in A. Beater and S. Habermeier (ed.) Invasion of Privacy by Media. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
18.
Kepplinger, H.M. and U. Köbke (2002) `Die vierte Gewalt' [Forth Power], pr-magazin8: 32—3.
19.
Kepplinger, H.M., S.C. Ehmig and U. Hartung (2002) Alltägliche Skandale. Eine repräsentative Analyse regionaler Fälle [Everyday Scandals: A Representative Analysis of Regional Scandals]. Konstanz: UVK-Verlags-Gesellschaft.
20.
Kunczik, M. and W. Bleh (1995) Kriminalitätsopfer in der Zeitungsberichterstattung. Folgen der Berichterstattung aus der Perspektive der Opfer [Victims of Crime in Press Coverage: Effects of the Coverage from the Victims' Point of View] . Mainz: Weisser Ring Verlag.
21.
Lang, K. and G. Engel Lang (1953) `The Unique Perspective of Television and its Effects: A Pilot Study', American Sociological Review18: 3—12.
22.
Lau, R.R. (1982) `Negativity in Political Perception', Political Behavior4(4): 353—77.
23.
Moran, G. and B.L. Cutler (1991) `The Prejudicial Impact of Pretrial Publicity', Journal of Applied Social Psychology21(5): 345—67.
24.
Nerb, J. and H. Spada (2001) `Evaluation of Environmental Problems: A Coherence Model of Cognition and Emotion', Cognition and Emotion15: 521—51.
25.
Protess, D.L., F.L. Cook, T.R. Curtin, M.T. Gordon, D.R.Left, M.E. McCombs and P. Miller (1987) `The Impact of Investigative Reporting on Public Opinion and Policymaking: Targeting Toxic Waste', Public Opinion Quarterly51(2): 166—85.
26.
Richey, M.H., L. McClelland and A.M. Shimkunas (1967) `Relative Influence of Positive and Negative Information in Impression Formation and Persistence', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology6(3): 322—7.
