Engaging with a set of ideas proposed in an article published in this journal in 2004, this article transposes concepts from one mediated condition to another, as it applies selected theories from audience reception studies to research on media and digital literacies. In approaching multi-method qualitative data from a project that researched youthful digital literacies on social networking sites, the article presents a discussion on anticipations of genre and modes of interpretative engagement. It is concluded that the text–reader framework of audience reception studies pushes the digital literacies discussion away from treating literacies as practical skills, encouraging a critical examination of people’s interpretative engagement with media texts. By doing this, the article also explores how concepts lying at the core of the reception studies repertoire need to be retained and revised in the age of the internet.
AllenR (1985) Speaking of Soap Operas. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
2.
AllenR (1992) Channels of Discourse, Reassembled: Television and Contemporary Criticism. London: Routledge.
3.
AngI (1985) Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. New York: Methuen.
4.
BachmairBBazalgetteC (2007) The European Charter for media literacy: Meaning and potential. Research in Comparative and International Education2(1): 80–87.
5.
BolterJDGrusinR (1998) Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
BrüggerN (2009) Website history and the website as an object of study. New Media and Society11(1/2): 115–133.
7.
BrunerJ (1991) The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry18(1): 1–21.
8.
BrunsA (2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
9.
BuckinghamD (2006) Is there a digital generation? In: BuckinghamDWilletR (eds) Digital Generation: Children, Young People and the Media. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1–13.
10.
BuckinghamD (2007) Digital media literacies: Rethinking media education in the age of the Internet. Research in Comparative and International Education2(1): 43–55.
11.
BuckinghamD (2009) ‘Creative’ visual methods in media research: Possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture and Society31(4): 633–652.
12.
BuckinghamD (2010) Talking about their generation: Constructions of the digital learner. In: DasRBeckettC (eds) ‘Digital Natives’: A Myth?London: POLIS.
13.
BurbulesN (1998) Rhetorics of the web: Hyperreading and critical literacy. In: SnyderI (ed.) Page to Screen: Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era. London: Routledge, 102–122.
14.
DasR (2010) Meaning at the interface: New genres, new modes of interpretative engagement?Communication Review13(2): 140–159.
15.
DasR (2011) Digital youth, heterogeneity and diversity: A report on the LSE-POLIS event on ‘Digital Natives’. Journal of Media Practice11(3): 293–299.
16.
EcoU (1979) The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
17.
FiskeJ (1988) Television Culture. London: Methuen.
18.
FootK (2009) Web use and meaning, materiality, and sociality through activity theory. Paper presented at 4S Annual Meeting, Washington DC, October.
19.
FornäsJKleinKLadendorfMSundenJSveningssonM (2002) Digital Borderlands: Cultural Studies of Identity and Interactivity on the Internet. New York: Peter Lang.
20.
FreebodyPLukeA (1990) Literacies programs: Debates and demands in cultural context. Prospect: Australian Journal of TESOL5(7): 7–16.
21.
GauntlettDHolzwarthP (2006) Creative and visual methods for exploring identities. Visual Studies21(1): 82–91.
22.
GeeJP (2006) Semiotic domains: Is playing video games a ‘waste of time’? In: SalenKZimmermanE (eds) The Game Design Reader: A Rules of Play Anthology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 228–267.
23.
HartleyJ (1996) Popular Reality: Journalism, Modernity, Popular Culture. London: Arnold.
24.
HullGSchultzK (2001) Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research71(4): 575–611.
25.
HutchbyI (2001) Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology35(2): 441–456.
26.
IserW (1974) The Implied Reader. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
IserW (1978) The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
ItoMBaumerSBittantiMBoydDCodyRHerrB. (2010) Hanging Out, Messing Around, Geeking Out: Living and Learning with New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
JaussHR (1982) Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
30.
JenkinsH (1992) Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. London: Routledge.
31.
JohnsonR (1986) What is cultural studies anyway?Social Text16 (Winter): 38–80.
KressG (2003) Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.
34.
KressG (2009) So what is learning, actually? Social change, technological change and a continuing place for the school? In: LivingstoneS (ed.) Digital Literacies: Tracing the Implications for Learners and Learning. ESRC Seminar Series: The Educational and Social Impact of New Technologies on Young People in Britain. Bristol: ESRC.
35.
LeuJDonaldJ (2000) Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In: KamilMLMosenthalPPearsonPDBarrR (eds) Handbook of Reading Research, Vol III. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
LewisCFabosB (2005) Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly40(4): 470–501.
37.
LiebesTKatzE (1993) The Export of Meaning: Cross-Cultural Readings of Dallas. Cambridge: Polity Press.
38.
LievrouwLLivingstoneS (2006) Introduction to the updated student edition. In: LievrouwLLivingstoneS (eds) The Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Social Consequences, rev. student edn. London: Sage, 1–14.
39.
LivingstoneS (1992) The resourceful reader: Interpreting television characters and narratives. With peer review commentaries. Communication Yearbook15: 58–90.
40.
LivingstoneS (1998) Making Sense of Television: The Psychology of Audience Interpretation, rev. 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
41.
LivingstoneS (2004) The challenge of changing audiences: Or, what is the audience researcher to do in the age of the internet?European Journal of Communication19(1): 75–86.
42.
LivingstoneS (2008) Engaging with media: A matter of literacy?Communication, Culture and Critique1(1): 51–62.
43.
LivingstoneS (2009) Children and the Internet: Great Expectations, Challenging Realities. London: Polity.
44.
LivingstoneSHaddonL (2009) Introduction. In: LivingstoneSHaddonL (eds) Kids Online: Opportunities and Risk for Children. London: Policy Press.
45.
McPhersonT (2008) Unexpected Outcomes and Innovative Uses of Digital Media by Youth. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
MorleyD (1993) Active audience theory: Pendulums and pitfalls. Journal of Communication43(4): 13–19.
47.
O’NeillBBarnesC (2008) Media Literacy and the Public Sphere: A Contextual Study for Public Media Literacy Promotion in Ireland. Dublin: Centre for Social and Educational Research, Dublin Institute of Technology.
48.
PapacharissiZ (2009) The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld. New Media and Society11(1/2): 199–221.
49.
PetersB (2009) And lead us not into thinking the new is new: A bibliographic case for new media history. New Media and Society11(1/2): 13–31.
50.
PotterWJ (2004) Argument for the need for a cognitive theory of media literacy. American Behavioral Scientist48(2): 266–272.
51.
PressALivingstoneS (2006) Taking audience research into the age of new media: Old problems and new challenges. In: WhiteMSchwochJ (eds) Questions of Method in Cultural Studies. Oxford: Blackwell, 175–200.
52.
RadwayJA (1984) Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
53.
Sefton-GreenJNixonHErstadO (2009) Reviewing approaches and perspectives on ‘digital literacy’. Pedagogies: An International Journal4(2): 107–125.
54.
SnyderI (2001) A new communication order: Researching literacy practices in the network society. Language and Education15(2): 117–131.
55.
SnyderIBeavisC (2004) Doing Literacy Online: Teaching, Learning and Playing in an Electronic World. New York: Hampton Press.
56.
StreetB (1998) New literacies in theory and practice: What are the implications for language in education?Linguistics and Education10(1): 1–24.
57.
WillettR (2009) Learning and social relations in teens’ online interactions. Paper presented at the Silverstone Panel on Digital Natives, LSE, London.
