Analysis of the most popular locally made soap operas in each of five European countries reveals that the soap opera is not simply an imported American genre. The study of British, Scandinavian and European soaps, based on an `ethnographic' approach to the social networks in the world of the soaps, shows that these countries have developed three distinctive subtypes of the genre: the community soap, the dynastic soap and the dyadic soap. For each of these subtypes, the article analyses the gender and class context for narrative events as portrayed within the soaps. While the kinship structure in both the dynastic (or patriarchal) and the community soaps constitutes a hegemonic, taken for granted framework for the programmes, the community soaps tend to be produced in the spirit of public service broadcasting and so are more likely to problematize gender issues in their conscious attempt to transmit social messages. The dyadic form appears to be taking over in the 1990s, harping on the modern and postmodern despair of too much freedom and too little trust. It operates in a destabilized environment, in which families have more or less disappeared, romantic dyads cannot be sustained, and women's quest for enduring ties takes the form of seeking primordial, biological, `genuine', blood ties.
Akyuz, G.
(1994) `Soaps Make a Clean Sweep', TV WorldJune: 16-22.
2.
Allen, R.C.
(1985) Speaking of Soap Operas. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
3.
Allen, R.C.
(ed.) (1995) To Be Continued...: Soap Operas Around the World. London: Routledge.
4.
Arlen, M.
(1980) Camera Age: Essays on Television, pp. 38-50. New York: Fearrar, Strauss and Giroux.
5.
Bombardier, D.
(1985) `Television as Instrument of Cultural Identity: The Case of Quebec', pp. 177-182 in E.M. Rogers and F. Balle (eds) The Media Revolution in American and Western Europe. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6.
Braudy, L.
(1982) `Popular Culture and Personal Time', The Yale Review71: 41: 481-488.
7.
Cavell, S.
(1981) Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Chesebro, J. W.
(1987) `Communication, Values, and Popular Television Series — a Four Year Assessment', pp. 8-46 in H. Newcomb (ed.) Television: The Critical View, 4th edn.New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Cunningham, S.
and E. Jacka (1994) `Neighbourly Relations? Cross-cultural Reception Analysis and Australian Soaps in Britain', Cultural Studies8(3): 509-526.
10.
Fiske, J.
(1987) Television Culture. London: Methuen.
11.
Frye, N.
(1957) Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
Hagedorn, R.
(1995) `Doubtless to be Continued: A Brief History of Serial Narrative', pp. 27-48 in R.C. Allen (ed.) To Be Continued...: Soap Operas Around the World. London: Routledge.
13.
Herzog, H.
(1944) `What Do We Really Know about Daytime Serial Listeners?', pp. 3-33 in P. Lazarsfeld and F. Stanton (eds) Radio Research. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.
14.
Hoggart, R.
(1957) The Uses of Literacy. London: Chatto & Windus.
15.
Kreutzner, G.
and E. Seiter (1995) `Not all “Soaps” are Created Equal: Towards a Cross-cultural Criticism of Television Serials', pp. 234-255 in R.C. Allen (ed.) To Be Continued...: Soap Operas Around the World. London: Routledge.
16.
Liebes, T.
and E. Katz (1993) The Export of Meaning. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17.
Liebes, T.
and S.M. Livingstone (1992) `Mothers and Lovers: Managing Women's Role Conflicts in American and British Soap Operas', pp. 94-120 in J.G. Blumler, J.M. McLeod and K.E. Rosengren (eds) Communication and Culture Across Space and Time: Prospects of Comparative Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Liebes, T.
and S.M. Livingstone (1994) `The Structure of Family and Romantic Ties in the Soap Opera: An Ethnographic Approach to the Cultural Framing of Primordiality', Communication Research21: 717-741.
19.
Liebes, T.
and S.M. Livingstone (forthcoming) `Gender Relations in European Soap Operas: A Comparative Analysis', manuscript in preparation.
20.
Livingstone, S.
(1998) Making Sense of Television: The Psychology of Audience Interpretation. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
21.
Livingstone, S.
and T. Liebes (1995) `Where Have all the Mothers Gone? Soap Opera's Replaying of the Oedipal Story', Critical Studies in Mass Communication12: 155-175.
22.
Mancini, P.
and D.L. Swanson (1996) `Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: Introduction', pp. 1-26 in D.L. Swanson and P. Mancini (eds) Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and their Consequences. New York: Praeger.
23.
Mander, M.
(1983) `Dallas: The Mythology of Crime and the Moral Occult', Journal of Popular Culture17: 44-48.
24.
Modleski, T.
(1982) Loving with a Vengeance. New York: Methuen.
25.
Mohr, P.J.
and H. O'Donnell (1996) `The Rise and Rise of Soap Operas in Europe', The Scottish Communication Association Journal2: 34-70.
26.
Morley, D.
and R. Silverstone (1990) `Domestic Communications: Technologies and Meanings', Media, Culture and Society12(1): 31-55.
27.
Mowlana, H.
(1990) `Japanese Programs on Iranian Television: A Study in International Flow of Information', paper presented at the 17th World Congress of the International Association for Mass Communication Researchers, Yugoslavia.
28.
O'Donnell, H.
(1996a) `People's Home to Home and Away: The Growth and Development of Soap Opera in Sweden', Irish Communication Review6: 56-68.
29.
O'Donnell, H.
(1996b) `From a Manichean Universe to the Kitchen Sink: The Telenovella in the Iberian Peninsula', International Journal of Iberian Studies9(1): 7-18.
30.
Pasquier, D.
(1994) `Hélène et les Garçons: éducation sentimentale', manuscript, ESPRIT.
31.
Press, A.
(1991) Women Watching Television. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
32.
Rogers, E.M.
and L. Antola (1985) `Telenovelas: A Latin American Success Story', Journal of Communication35(4): 24-35.
33.
Schiller, H.I.
(1992) Mass Communication: An American Empire. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
34.
Schrøder, K.C.
and M. Skovmand (1992) `Introduction', pp. 1-21 in M. Skovmand and K.C. Schrøder (eds) Media Cultures: Reappraising Transnational Media. London: Routledge.
35.
Silj, A.
(1988) East of Dallas: The European Challenge to American Television. London: British Film Institute.
36.
Thorburn, D.
(1982) `Television Melodrama', pp. 529-546 in H. Newcomb (ed.) Television: The Critical View. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
Todd, E.
(1985) The Explanation of Ideology: Family Structures and Social Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
38.
Tracey, M.
(1985) `The Poisoned Chalice? International Television and the Idea of Dominance', Dedalus114(4): 17-56.
39.
Tracey, M.
(1988) `Popular Culture and the Economics of the Global Village', Intermedia16(2): 8-25.
40.
Williams, R.
(1974) Television: Technology and Cultural Form. London: Fontana.
