The role of pragmatics in reflexive interpretation by Turkish learners of English

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of pragmatic principles on the acquisition of the binding of English reflexives by adult Turkish second language (L2) learners. The study compares pragmatically biased and pragmatically neutral sentences to determine whether pragmatic bias towards a non-local antecedent overrides the parameter setting of English and causes learners to choose as possible antecedents NPs outside the binding domain. Both group and individual results indicate that pragmatically biased sentences compel the subjects to consider pragmatic information to the extent that it can affect their choice of local antecedent. Acquisition theories should account for the role that pragmatic information might play in the assignment of possible antecedents for reflexives.This study incorporates Huang's (1994) ‘pragmatic theory of anaphora’ in which the interpretation of a reflexive is subject to the I-principle, a pragmatic strategy which finds an antecedent for the reflexive that gives the most informative, stereotypical interpretation in keeping with our knowledge about the world.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berent, G.P. and Samar,V.J. 1990: The psychological reality of the subset principle: evidence form the governing categories of prelingually deaf adults .Language 66, 717–741 .

Chomsky, N. 1981.Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris .

Chomsky, N. 1986.Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger .

Chomsky, N. 1995.The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

Christie, K. and Lantolf, J.P. 1993.Bind me up, bind me down: a UG study of reflexives in the second language. Unpublished paper presented at the MIT workshop on recent advances in SLA, Cambridge, MA.

Cole, P. , Hermon, G. and Sung, L.M. 1990. Principles of parameters of long distance reflexives .Linguistic Inquiry 21, 1–22 .

Eckman, F.R. 1994. Local and long-distance anaphora in second-language acquisition. In Tarone, E.E. , Gass, S.M. , and Cohen, A.D. , editors, Research methodology in second language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum , 207–226.

Finer, D. 1991. Binding parameters in second language acquisition. In Eubank, L. , editor,Point counterpoint: universal grammar in the second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 350–374.

Finer, D. and Broselow, E. 1986. Second language of reflexive binding . Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 16, 154–168 .

10.

Hawkins, J.A. 1988. Explaining language universals. In Hawkins, J. , editor, Explaining language universals. Oxford: Blackwell , 3–23.

11.

Hirakawa, M. 1990. A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives . Second Language Research 6, 60–85 .

12.

Huang, C.-T.J. and Tang, C.-C.J. 1991. The local nature of the long-distance reflexive in Chinese. In Koster, J. and Reuland, E. , editors,Long-distance anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 263–282.

13.

Huang, Y. 1994.The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

14.

Lakshmanan, U. and Teranishi, K. 1994. Preferences versus grammaticality judgments: some methodological issues concerning the governing category parameter in second language acquisition. In Tarone, E.E. , Gass, S.M. and Cohen, A.D. , editors,Research methodology in second language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum , 185–206.

15.

Levinson, S. 1987. Minimization and conversational inference. In Verschueren, J. and Bertuccelli-Papi, M. , editors,The pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 61–129.

16.

MacLaughlin, D. 1995. Universal Grammar and L2 acquisition of reflexive binding: some learners acquire a non-L1/non-target system. Unpublished paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Ithaca, NY.

17.

Manzini, M.R. and Wexler, K. 1987. Parameters, binding theory and learnability .Linguistic Inquiry 18, 413–444 .

18.

Pica, P. 1987. On the nature of the reflexivization cycle . Proceedings of the North-eastern Linguistics Society 17, 483–499 .

19.

Selinker, L. and Lakshmanan, U. 1994. Language transfer and fossilization. In Gass, S. and Selinker, L. , editors,Language transfer in language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 197–216.

20.

Thomas, M. 1989. The interpretation of English reflexive pronouns by non-native speakers .Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11, 281–301 .

21.

Thomas, M. 1991. Universal grammar and the interpretation of reflexives on a second language .Language 67, 211–239 .

22.

Thomas, M. 1993.Knowledge of reflexives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .

23.

Thomas, M. 1995. Acquisition of the Japanese reflexive ‘zibun’ and movement of anaphors in logical form .Second Language Research 11, 206–234 .

24.

White, L. 1994. Universal grammar: is it just a new name for old problems? In Gass, S. and Selinker, L. , editors,Language transfer in language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 217–232.

25.

White, L. , Hirakawa, M. and Kawasaki, T. 1996. Second language acquisition of long distance reflexives: effects and non-effects of input manipulation .McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 129–152 .

26.

White, L. , Spada, N. and Kawasaki, T. 1991. Input enhancement and L2 question formation .Applied Linguistics 12, 416–432 .