This study examines an interlanguage in which Moroccan learners of Dutch use non-thematic verbs in combination with thematic verbs that can be inflected as well. These non-thematic verbs are real dummy auxiliaries because they are deprived of semantic content and primarily have a syntactic function. Whereas in earlier second language (L2) research only patterns with ‘be’ were found for learners of three Germanic languages with various first language (L1) backgrounds, an alternative dummy auxiliary pattern was observed with ‘go’ in the data of the Moroccan learners of Dutch. We argue that the auxiliary pattern with ‘go’ is bootstrapped by the unique similarities between Dutch (L2) and Arabic (L1). The emergence of dummy auxiliaries precedes movement of the thematic verb, and it turns out that adult L2 learners can be plainly focused on expressing syntactic properties.
Akmajian A. and Heny F. ( 1975) An introduction to the principles of transformational syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
2.
Benmamoun E. ( 1992) Functional and inflectional morphology: Problems of projection, representation and derivation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Carolina, Los Angeles, CA.
3.
Blom E. ( 2003) From root infinitives to finite sentence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.
4.
Blom E. and De Korte S. ( 2008) De verwerving van het Nederlands: Dummies en Verb Second. Nederlandse Taalkunde13: 133-59.
5.
Boersma P. and Weenink D. ( 2003) PRAAT Phonological Transcription, version 4.2.34. Available online via http://www.praat.org (May 2010).
6.
Chomsky N. ( 1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
Clahsen H. ( 1984) The acquisition of German word order: A test case for cognitive approaches to L2 development. In: Andersen R (ed.) Second languages. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 219-42.
8.
Coenen J. and Van Hout R. ( 1987) Word order phenomena in second language acquisition of Dutch. In: Beukema F and Coopmans P (eds) Linguistics in the Netherlands 1987. Dordrecht: Foris, 41-50.
9.
Council of Europe (2001) A Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
DeKeyser R. ( 2005) What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning55, supplement 1: 1-25.
11.
Den Besten H. ( 1989) Studies in West Germanic syntax. Amsterdam : Rodopi.
12.
Eubank L. ( 1992) Verb movement, agreement and tense in L2 acquisition. In: Meisel JM (eds) The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language development . Dordrecht: Kluwer, 225-44.
13.
Eubank L.(1993/94) On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition3: 183-208.
14.
Eubank L.1996: Negation in early German-English interlanguage: More valueless features in the L2-initial state. Second Language Research12: 73-106.
15.
Fanselow G. and Cavar D. ( 2002) Distributed deletion. In: Alexiadou A (ed.) Theoretical approaches to universals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 65-97.
16.
Fleta MT ( 2003) Is-insertion in L2 grammars of English: A step forward between developmental stages? In: Zobl H and Goodluck H (eds) Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2002). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 85-96.
17.
García Mayo MP, Ibarrola AL, and Liceras JM ( 2005) Placeholders in the English interlanguage of bilingual (Basque-Spanish) children. Language Learning55: 445-89.
18.
Grondin N. and White L. ( 1996) Functional categories in child L2 acquisition of French . Language Acquisition1: 1-34.
19.
Haberzettl S. ( 2003) ‘Tinkering’ with chunks: Form-oriented strategies and idiosyncratic utterance patterns without functional implications in the IL of Turkish speaking children learning German. In: Dimroth C and Starren M (eds) Information structure and the dynamics of language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 45-63.
20.
Haegeman L. and Zanuttini R. ( 1991) Negative heads and the Neg criterion. The Linguistic Review8: 233-52.
21.
Haeseryn W., Romijn K., Geerts G., de Rooij J., and van den Toorn MC (1997) Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst . Groningen/Deurne: Martinus Nijhoff/Wolters Plantyn.
22.
Harrell R. ( 1962) A short reference grammar of Moroccan Arabic. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
23.
Hawkins R. ( 2001) Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
24.
Haznedar B. and Schwartz BD ( 1997) Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In: Hughes E, Hughes M, and Greenhill A (eds) Proceedings of the 21st AnnualBoston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 257-68.
25.
Huebner Th ( 1989) Establishing point of view: The development of coding mechanisms in a second language for the expression of cognitive and perceptual organization. Linguistics27: 111-43.
26.
Ionin T. and Wexler K. ( 2001) L1 Russian children learning English: Tense and overgeneralization of be. Proceedings of the 2000 Second Language Research Forum. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 76-94.
27.
Jolink A. ( 2000) Finite linking in normally developing Dutch children and children with specific language impairment. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik140: 61-81.
28.
Jordens P. ( 1990) The acquisition of verb placement in Dutch and German . Linguistics28: 1407-48.
29.
Jordens P. and Dimroth C. ( 2006) Finiteness in children and adults learning Dutch. In: Gagarina N and Gülzow I (eds) Discovering the world of verbs. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 167-95.
30.
Lado R. ( 1957) Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
31.
Lakshmanan U. ( 1994) Universal Grammar in child second language acquisition . Amsterdam: Benjamins.
32.
Lardiere D. ( 1998) Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent end-state grammar. Second Language Research14: 359-75.
33.
Lardiere D. ( 2000) Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition . In: Archibald J (ed.) Second language acquisition and linguistic theory. Oxford : Blackwell, 102-29.
34.
Lee EJ ( 2001) Interlanguage development by to Korean speakers of English with a focus on temporality. Language Learning54: 591-633.
35.
Meisel JM ( 1991) Principles of Universal Grammar and strategies of language use: On some similarities and differences between first and second language acquisition. In: Eubank L (ed.) Point counterpoint. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 231-76.
36.
Meisel JM ( 1997) The acquisition of syntax of negation in French and German: Contrasting first and second language development. Second Language Research13: 227-63.
37.
Nunes J. ( 2005) Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
Ouhalla J. ( 1991) Functional categories and parametric variation. London: Routledge.
39.
Parodi T. ( 2000) Finiteness and verb placement in second language acquisition . Second Language Research14: 355-81.
40.
Perdue (1993) Adult language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Prévost P. and White L. ( 2000) Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research16: 103-33.
42.
Radford A. ( 1988) Transformational grammar: A first course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Roeper T. ( 1992) From the initial state to V2: Acquisition principles in action. In: Meisel J (ed.) The acquisition of verb placement. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 333-70.
44.
Roeper T. ( 1999) Universal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition2: 169-86.
45.
Schwartz BD and Sprouse R. ( 1994) Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In: Hoekstra T and Schwartz BD (eds) Language acquisition studies in generative grammar . Amsterdam: Benjamins, 317-68.
46.
Schwartz BD and Sprouse R. ( 1996) L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research12: 40-72.
47.
Starren M. ( 2001) The second time: The acquisition of temporality in Dutch and French as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tilburg.
48.
Vainikka A. and Young-Scholten M. ( 1994) Direct access to X′-theory: Evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German. In: Hoekstra T and Schwartz BD (eds) Language acquisition studies in generative grammar. Amsterdam : Benjamins, 265-316.
49.
Vainikka A. and Young-Scholten M. ( 1996) Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research12: 7-39.
50.
Van de Craats I.(2009) The role of IS in the acquisition of finiteness by adult Turkish learners of Dutch. Studies in Second Language Acquisition31: 59-92.
51.
Van Kampen J. ( 1997) First steps in wh-movement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , Utrecht University.
52.
White L. ( 1996) Clitics in child L2 French. In: Hawkins R and Clahsen H (eds) Generative approaches to first and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 335-68.
53.
Whong-Barr M. and Schwartz BD ( 2002) Morphological and syntactic transfer in child L2 acquisition of the English dative alternation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition24: 579-616.
