This paper investigates whether Universal Grammar (UG) is accessible to adult language learners. If adult acquirers have consistent access to intuitions of grammaticality in cases where the relevant constraints are underdetermined by the native language, this suggests that Universal Grammar continues to function in adult acquisition.
Advanced Korean adult acquirers of English were given a test of grammaticality judgements on English wh-movement sentences, where the relevant constraints are thought to derive from principles of UG. Since Korean does not have syntactic wh-movement, correct intuitions cannot derive from native language transfer. Analysis of the results and comparison with native speaker results suggests a complex picture of the function of UG in adult language acquisition; however, clear UG effects were found.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, N., Madden, C. and Krashen, S.1974: Is there a 'natural sequence' in adult second language learning? Language Learning24:235-43.
2.
Birdsong, D.1986: Empirical impediments to theories of second language acquisition . Paper presented at the Kentucky Foreign Language Conference, University of Kentucky, Lexington, April 24-26, 1986.
3.
Bley-Vroman, R. (in press): The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis.
4.
Bouchard, D.1984: On the content of empty categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
5.
Braidi, S.M.1987: Universals in language acquisition: The Tensed S Constraint in L2A. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, February 20-22, 1987.
6.
Chaudron, C.1983: Research on metalinguistic judgments: a review of theory, methods, and results. Language Learning23:343-77.
7.
Chomsky, N.1973: Conditions on transformations. In: Anderson, S. and Kiparsky, P., editors, A Festschrift forMorrisHalle, New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
8.
— 1980: Rules and representations. New York : Columbia University Press.
9.
— 1981: Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
10.
— 1986a: Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
11.
— 1986b: Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J. and Pienemann, M.1983: Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Tübingen : Narr.
13.
Clahsen, H. and Muysken, P.1986: The availability of universal grammar to child and adult learners. Second Language Research2:93-119.
14.
Dulay, H. and Burt, M.1974: Natural sequences in child second language acquisition . Language Learning24: 37-53.
15.
Felix, S.1976: Wh-pronouns in first and second language acquisition . Linguistische Berichte44: 52-64.
16.
— 1985: More evidence on competing cognitive systems. Second Language Research1: 47-72.
17.
— (in press): UG-generated knowledge in second language acquisition. In: Flynn, S. and O'Neill, W., editors, Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, Dordrecht: Reidel.
18.
Grosu, A.1973: On the status of the so-called Right Roof Constraint . Language49:294-311.
19.
Hakuta, K.1976: A case study of a Japanese child learning English as a second language. Language Learning26: 321-51.
20.
Ioup, G. and Kruse, A.1977: Interference versus structural complexity in second language acquisition: language universals as a basis for natural sequencing . In: Brown, D., Yorio, C. and Crymes, R., editors, Teaching and learning. Washington, DC: TESOL.
21.
loup, G. and Tansomboon, A.1987: The acquisition of tone: a maturational perspective . In: Ioup, G. and Weinberger, S., editors, Interlanguage phonology, Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
22.
Kayne, R.1983: Connectedness. Linguistic Inquiry14: 223-50.
23.
Kellerman, E.1979: Transfer and nontrasfer: where are we now?Studies in Second Language Acquisition2: 37-58.
24.
Lasnik, H. and Saito, M.1984: On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry15: 235-89.
25.
Meisel, J.1983: Transfer as a second language strategy. Language and Communication3: 11-46.
26.
Ritchie, W.1978: The Right Roof Constraint in an adult-acquired language . In: Ritchie, W., editor, Second language acquisition research, New York : Academic Press.
27.
Ross, J.R.1967: Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD dissertation , MIT.
28.
Schachter, J.1987: Testing a proposed universal. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, February 20-22, 1987.
29.
Schumann, J.1978: The pidginization process: a model for second language development. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
30.
White, L.1985: The acquisition of parameterized grammars: subjacency in second language acquisition. Second Language Research1:1-17.
31.
Wode, H.1977: On the systematicity of L1 transfer in L2 acquisition . In: Henning, C., editor, Proceedings of theLos AngelesSecond Language Research Forum, Department of English, UCLA.
32.
Zobl, H.1980: The formal and developmental selectivity of L 1 influence on L2 acquisition. Language Learning30: 42-57.
