A cost-reducing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) program model: a single institution experience

Abstract

Background:

The worldwide demand for ECMO support has grown. Its provision remains limited due to several factors (high cost, complicated technology, lack of expertise) that increase healthcare cost. Our goal was to assess if an intensive care unit (ICU)-run ECMO model without continuous bedside perfusionists would decrease costs while maintaining patient safety and outcomes.

Method:

A new ECMO program was implemented in 2010, consisting of dedicated ICU multidisciplinary providers (ICU-registered nurses, mid-level providers and intensivists). In year one, we introduced an education platform, new technology and dedicated space. In year two, continuous bedside monitoring by perfusionists was removed and new management algorithms designating multidisciplinary providers as first responders were established. The patient safety and cost benefit from the removal of the continuous bedside monitoring of the perfusionists of this new ECMO program was retrospectively reviewed and compared.

Results:

During the study period, 74 patients (28 patients in year 1 and 46 patients in year 2) were placed on ECMO (mean days: 8 ± 5.7). The total annual hospital expenditure for the ECMO program was significantly reduced in the new model ($234,000 in year 2 vs. $600,264 in year 1), showing a 61% decrease in cost. This cost decrease was attributed to a decreased utilization of perfusion services and the introduction of longer lasting and more efficient ECMO technology. We did not find any significant changes in registered nurse ratios or any differences in outcomes related to ICU safety events.

Conclusion:

We demonstrated that the ICU-run ECMO model managed to lower hospital cost by reducing the cost of continuous bedside perfusion support without a change in outcomes.

Keywords

ECMO ICU cost patient safety

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ELSO registry report international summary, January 2013. Available from Extracorporeal Life Support Organization web site: http://www.elsonet.org/ (Accessed 1 January 2014).

ELSO guidelines for ECMO centers. Available from Extracorporeal Life Support Organization web site. http://www.elsonet.org/ (Accessed 1 January 2014).

Crow

Fischer

Schears

. Extracorporeal life support: utilization, cost, controversy, and ethics of trying to save lives. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009; 13: 183-191.

H1N1 information. Available from Extracorporeal Life Support Organization web site. http://www.elso.med.umich.edu/H1N1Info.html (Accessed 1 January 2014).

Freeman

Nault

Mowry

Baldridge

. Expanded resources through utilization of a primary care giver extracorporeal membrane oxygenation model. Crit Care Nurs Q 2012; 35: 39-49.

Berryman

. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a Scottish intensive care unit. Nurs Crit Care 2010; 15: 262-268.

Mongero

Beck

Charette

. Managing the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuit integrity and safety utilizing the perfusionist as the “ECMO Specialist”. Perfusion 2013; 28: 552-554.

AmSECT’s Recommendations on Portable and Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices. 2011. Downloaded March 4, 2014 from http://www.amsect.org/documents/PDF/MSC-letter-JECT_10-27-11.pdf.