Long term follow-up of bilateral internal thoracic artery use in young coronary artery bypass grafting patients: 29 year single surgeon experience

Abstract

Background

Improved long term survival has demonstrated by grafting left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to the left anterior descending artery (LAD). This study investigated the prognostic benefits of BITA versus single LITA with common anastomotic configurations of BITA.

Methods

Elective patients age below 60 years, undertaken by a single surgeon, between 1992 and 2014 were explored. Cox regression models were fitted to investigate prognostic benefits of BITA. Specific comparisons were made with BITA subgroups who received LITA to LAD or RITA to LAD to establish long-term prognostic difference with the use of the RITA to LAD as compared to the LITA to LAD anastomosis. Comparisons were made with other BITA configurations to establish long-term difference in survival as a result of the actual targets bypassed with BITA grafts.

Results

Both groups had similar baseline patient characteristics. Following risk adjustment, the use of a second ITA conferred a significant 48% reduction in long-term mortality to BITA group [HR 0.52 (95%CI: 0.36–0.74) p < .001]. The use of the RITA to LAD, instead of LITA, resulted in no difference in the long-term prognostic benefit. The targets grafted with second ITA conferred a significant prognostic benefit for common configurations it was used in for bypass surgery.

Conclusions

The use of BITA confers long term prognostic benefit to patients. Grafting RITA to LAD instead of more common LITA to LAD made no difference in long term prognosis when compared to CABG patients with single ITA. The use of a second ITA conduit in common configurations for CABG confers prognostic benefits irrespective of distal target grafted.

Keywords

bilateral internal mammary artery coronary artery bypass grafting Ischaemic heart disease

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Loop

Lytle

Cosgrove

, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986; 314(1): 1–6.

Cameron

Davis

Green

, et al. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts — effects on survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J Med 1996; 334(4): 216–219.

Samadashvili

Sundt

Wechsler

, et al. Multiple versus single arterial coronary bypass graft surgery for multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74(10): 1275–1285.

Schwann

Habib

Wallace

, et al. Operative outcomes of multiple-arterial versus single-arterial coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105(4): 1109–1119.

Lytle

Blackstone

Loop

, et al. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 117(5): 855–872.

Taggart

Benedetto

Gerry

, et al. Bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts at 10 years. N Engl J Med 2019; 380(5): 437–446.

Gaudino

Benedetto

Fremes

, et al. Radial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2018; 378(22): 2069–2077.

Taggart

Altman

Gray

, et al. Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). Eur Heart J 2010; 31(20): 2470–2481.

Taggart

Altman

Gray

, et al. Randomized trial of bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts. N Engl J Med 2016; 375(26): 2540–2549.

10.

Kurlansky

Traad

Dorman

, et al. Thirty-Year follow-up defines survival benefit for second internal mammary artery in propensity-matched groups. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90(1): 101–108.

11.

Buxton

Ruengsakulrach

Fuller

, et al. The right internal thoracic artery graft — benefits of grafting the left coronary system and native vessels with a high grade stenosis✩. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2000;18(3):255–261.

12.

Endo

Nishida

Tomizawa

, et al. Benefit of bilateral over single internal mammary artery grafts for multiple coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 2001; 104(18): 2164–2170.

13.

Calafiore

Di Mauro

Di Giammarco

, et al. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery for isolated first myocardial revascularization in multivessel disease: long-term clinical results in medically treated diabetic patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80(3): 888–895.

14.

Kurlansky

Traad

Galbut

, et al. Efficacy of single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in women: a long-term study. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71(6): 1949–1957.

15.

Gaudino

Audisio

Di Franco

, et al. Radial artery versus saphenous vein versus right internal thoracic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg 2022; 62(1): ezac345.

16.

Galbut

Traad

Dorman

, et al. Seventeen-year experience with bilateral internal mammary artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 49(2): 195–201.

17.

Carrel

Horber

Turina

. Operation for two-vessel coronary artery disease: midterm results of bilateral ITA grafting versus unilateral ITA and saphenous vein grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62(5): 1289–1294.

18.

Dion

Verhelst

Rousseau

, et al. Sequential mammary grafting. Clinical, functional, and angiographic assessment 6 months postoperatively in 231 consecutive patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 98(1): 80–88.

19.

Chow

Sim

Orszulak

, et al. Patency of internal thoracic artery grafts: comparison of right versus left and importance of vessel grafted. Circulation 1994; 90(5 Pt 2): II129–132.